Phys Written Answers · geriatric
Elder Abuse and Safeguarding — Written Clinical Reasoning
DCE long-case preparation: structured written reasoning for an 82-year-old woman with moderate Alzheimer disease admitted with dehydration and malnutrition whose daughter has been managing her finances and may be financially and psychologically abusing her (recognition, capacity assessment, safeguarding enquiry, tribunal referral, and the autonomy-protection balance), and the management of a 79-year-old woman with intact cognition who discloses financial and psychological abuse by her son but declines formal intervention (capacitous refusal, harm reduction, confidentiality versus duty to protect).
On this page
Study tools
Target exams
SAQ 1 — Integrated Management of Suspected Elder Abuse in a Non-Capacitous Patient with Dementia (20 marks, 30 minutes)
Prompt: Outline your integrated approach to this 82-year-old woman with moderate Alzheimer disease, dehydration, malnutrition and a pressure injury, whose daughter (her enduring power of attorney and sole carer) is displaying controlling behaviour and may be financially and psychologically abusing her, including: (a) recognition and types of abuse; (b) immediate safety; (c) capacity assessment; (d) safeguarding referral and legal interventions; (e) mandatory reporting; and (f) support services. [1]
Model Answer
(a) Recognition and types of suspected abuse (3 marks): [1]
This presentation raises suspicion of multiple concurrent types of elder abuse [4][6]. The neglect is evident from the dehydration, the 8 kg weight loss over 3 months, and the Stage 2 sacral pressure injury in a patient who is still mobile — a pressure injury in a mobile patient suggests failure of basic care (positioning, nutrition, hydration, hygiene). The psychological abuse is suggested by the patient's withdrawn and fearful demeanour, her disclosure that the daughter yells at her, and the daughter's controlling behaviour (refusing to leave the room, answering for the patient, becoming hostile when challenged). The financial abuse is suggested by the recent transfer of the patient's house into joint names — an unexplained change to property title in a patient with moderate dementia who cannot have meaningfully consented to or understood the transaction. The delayed presentation (dehydration and malnutrition at an advanced stage before seeking medical attention) is itself a red flag for neglect. The WHO definition — a single or repeated act, or lack of appropriate action, occurring within a relationship of expectation of trust, causing harm or distress — is met on all counts [6].
(b) Immediate safety plan (3 marks): [1]
The patient is in immediate danger from ongoing neglect and psychological abuse. She lacks the capacity to protect herself (MMSE 17, moderate Alzheimer disease). The hospital admission is her place of safety — she must not be discharged home to the daughter's care until a full safeguarding assessment has been completed and a safe plan is in place. The daughter's controlling behaviour in hospital — refusing to leave the room, becoming hostile — must be managed by setting clear boundaries: I need to speak to your mother alone, as is standard practice. If the daughter refuses, this is itself a red flag and is documented. The nursing staff must monitor for any attempt by the daughter to remove the patient from the ward against medical advice. If the daughter attempts this, security may need to be involved and the patient retained under the doctrine of necessity. [1]
(c) Capacity assessment (3 marks): [1]
The patient almost certainly lacks capacity for decisions about her safety, her finances, and her living situation. I apply the two-stage test [5]. Stage 1 (diagnostic): she has a clear impairment of mind or brain — moderate Alzheimer disease (MMSE 17). Stage 2 (functional): because of this impairment, she cannot understand the information about the abuse and the options for her safety, retain it, use or weigh it, or communicate a consistent decision. Her brief disclosure (She yells) does not constitute capacity — it reflects her experience but she cannot integrate this into a protective decision. I would document the assessment formally, noting the specific decisions assessed, the information given, the patient's responses, the four abilities, and the conclusion. I would also exclude reversible contributors to her cognitive state — the dehydration and possible infection are treated first, and her capacity is reassessed once she is medically stable, though her underlying moderate dementia will persist.
(d) Safeguarding referral and legal interventions (4 marks): [1]
The management requires a multidisciplinary safeguarding response. I involve social work immediately for psychosocial assessment, coordination, and a formal safeguarding referral to the hospital or community elder abuse service. I document the physical findings with photographs and a body map of the pressure injury, the weight loss, and any other signs, with exact quotes of the patient's disclosure. [1]
Because the suspected perpetrator is the patient's enduring power of attorney and substitute decision-maker, the state tribunal must be involved. In Australia this is the state civil and administrative tribunal (NCAT in NSW, VCAT in Victoria, or the equivalent). The tribunal has the power to review and revoke an enduring guardianship or power of attorney that is being misused, and to appoint an independent guardian for personal and lifestyle decisions (including where the patient lives and who provides care) and an independent financial manager for the patient's estate. The tribunal application is made urgently given the evidence of ongoing harm. [1]
An Apprehended Violence Order (AVO) or equivalent may be sought to prohibit the daughter from contacting or approaching the patient if she is assessed as a continuing threat. The police may be involved if the financial exploitation (the house transfer) constitutes fraud or if there is evidence of a criminal assault. [1]
(e) Mandatory reporting considerations (3 marks): [1]
Mandatory reporting for elder abuse varies by jurisdiction and setting. If this patient were a resident of an aged-care facility, the Aged Care Act 1997 (as amended in 2024) would require the approved provider to report serious incidents — including unexplained weight loss, pressure injuries, and suspected abuse — to the Aged Care Quality and Safety Commission. However, this patient lives in the community, and in most Australian jurisdictions there is no mandatory reporting obligation for a clinician seeing a community-dwelling patient. What the clinician has instead is a professional and ethical duty to protect a non-capacitous person at serious risk. Because the patient lacks capacity and is being harmed, the duty to protect overrides confidentiality — the safeguarding referral and tribunal application are made in her best interests, and the daughter is informed of the actions taken. In NSW, a report could also be made to the Ageing and Disability Commission. In the UK, the local authority would be notified under the Care Act 2014 duty to make enquiries. [1]
(f) Support services (4 marks): [1]
The long-term management involves a comprehensive support package. Once the tribunal has appointed an independent guardian and financial manager, the patient's living arrangements are reassessed — she may be placed in residential aged care, or supported at home with a community aged-care package and a different (non-abusing) carer. Community aged-care services (home care package) provide personal care, domestic assistance, meal preparation, and medication management. Counselling is offered for the depression, anxiety, and post-traumatic distress that commonly follow elder abuse. Financial counselling and legal aid are arranged to investigate the house transfer and, if possible, to recover the misappropriated property. Family meetings are held (with the independent guardian and social work) to explain the plan and to address the family dynamics. Follow-up is arranged to monitor for recurrence, and the GP and community services are notified of the plan. The overarching principle is the least restrictive intervention that ensures safety — institutionalisation is not automatic if supported home care can be made safe. [1]
References6ShowHide
- [1]Yon Y, Mikton CR, Gassoumis ZD, Wilber KH Elder abuse prevalence in community settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis Lancet Glob Health, 2017.PMID 28104184
- [2]Yaffe MJ, Wolfson C, Lithwick M, Weiss D Development and validation of a tool to improve physician identification of elder abuse: the Elder Abuse Suspicion Index (EASI) J Elder Abuse Negl, 2008.PMID 18928055
- [3]Lachs MS, Williams CS, O'Brien S, Pillemer KA, Charlson ME The mortality of elder mistreatment JAMA, 1998.PMID 9701077
- [4]Pillemer K, Burnes D, Riffin C, Lachs MS Elder Abuse: Global Situation, Risk Factors, and Prevention Strategies Gerontologist, 2016.PMID 26994260
- [5]Appelbaum PS Clinical practice. Assessment of patients' competence to consent to treatment N Engl J Med, 2007.PMID 17978292
- [6]Lachs MS, Pillemer K Elder abuse Lancet, 2004.PMID 15464188