Phys Written Answers · cardiovascular
ECG Interpretation — Written Clinical Reasoning
DCE long-case preparation: structured written reasoning for physician-level ECG interpretation, including the systematic approach, ischaemia/mimic discrimination, and integration of the ECG into a complex patient's management plan.
On this page
Study tools
Target exams
SAQ 1 — Integrated ECG Interpretation and Management (20 marks, 30 minutes)
Prompt: Interpret this ECG systematically using the five-step approach, state the most likely diagnosis and the immediate, definitive and surveillance management, and justify each decision. Identify the key exam trap and how you would avoid it. [1]
Model Answer
Systematic five-step interpretation (5 marks): [1]
- Rate: 88 per minute (300 ÷ 3.4 large squares) — normal.
- Rhythm: Sinus — every P followed by a QRS, P axis normal (upright in II, inverted in aVR), PR constant, R–R regular.
- Axis: Normal (positive QRS in I and aVF).
- Intervals: PR normal, QRS < 120 ms, QTc 460 ms (borderline-long; Bazett formula).
- Morphology: Two coexisting abnormalities — (a) deep symmetrical T-wave inversion in V2–V3 with preserved R waves; (b) Sokolow-Lyon voltage for LVH (SV1 + RV5 ≥ 35 mm) with lateral strain pattern (asymmetric ST depression and T inversion in I, aVL, V5–V6). [1]
Diagnosis (3 marks): [1]
The dominant acute finding is Wellens syndrome — deep symmetrical T-wave inversion in V2–V3 during a pain-free period, with preserved R waves and only a mildly elevated troponin. This indicates a critical stenosis high in the proximal LAD (de Zwaan, Bär and Wellens, 1982; PMID 6121481). The coexisting LVH with strain reflects his chronic hypertensive heart disease and is a chronic, not acute, change. [1]
Key exam trap (2 marks): The danger is treating this as a low-risk NSTEMI (because the patient is pain-free and the troponin is only mildly raised) and arranging functional testing. Wellens is specifically a pain-free phenomenon, and the ECG is most abnormal when the patient feels best. A stress test is contraindicated — provoking demand ischaemia in a critical proximal LAD stenosis risks occlusion and extensive anterior infarction. [1]
Immediate management (4 marks): [1]
- Antiplatelet and antithrombotic therapy: Aspirin 300 mg loading then 100 mg daily, plus a P2Y12 inhibitor (ticagrelor 180 mg load then 90 mg BD, or clopidogrel if high bleeding risk), plus parenteral anticoagulation (unfractionated heparin or fondaparinux).
- Urgent coronary angiography — NOT a routine NSTEMI 72-hour pathway, and NOT an outpatient stress test. The aim is to identify and revascularise the critical proximal LAD lesion (PCI with drug-eluting stent, or CABG if complex anatomy).
- Secondary prevention: High-intensity statin (atorvastatin 80 mg), beta-blocker, and an ACE inhibitor or ARB (cautious dosing given CKD; monitor renal function and potassium).
- Glucose control and smoking cessation counselling as part of secondary prevention. [1]
Definitive and longitudinal management (3 marks): [1]
- Post-revascularisation: dual antiplatelet therapy for 12 months (longer if stent-specific guidance), high-intensity statin, beta-blocker, RAAS blocker, SGLT2 inhibitor (cardiovascular + renal benefit in diabetes with CKD).
- Optimise blood pressure to < 130/80 with the above regimen; address the LVH substrate.
- Echocardiography to assess left ventricular function and wall motion; if LVEF is reduced, institute GDMT for HFrEF.
- Cardiac rehabilitation, diabetic optimisation, nephrology co-management for CKD. [1]
Surveillance and communication (2 marks): [1]
- Serial ECGs during the admission to detect evolution (development of pathologic Q waves, persistent T inversion).
- Explain to the patient in plain language: "You have a severe narrowing in the main artery on the front of your heart. We need to look with a coronary angiogram and likely open it with a stent today or tomorrow to prevent a major heart attack."
- Document the Wellens pattern explicitly in the chart so the catheter-lab team understands the urgency. [1]
High-yield discriminating question the examiner will ask (1 mark): [1]
"How do you distinguish Wellens from other causes of deep anterior T-wave inversion?" Answer: Wellens is characterised by (1) the pain-free timing, (2) preserved R waves (no infarction yet), (3) minimal/no troponin rise, and (4) a critical proximal LAD stenosis at angiography. Other causes of deep anterior T inversion — evolving STEMI (which has ST elevation or Q waves), apical HCM (giant T inversion with LVH voltage), pulmonary embolism (S1Q3T3, sinus tachycardia, right-heart strain), and stress (takotsubo) cardiomyopathy — do not share this combination. [1]
References5ShowHide
- [1]Kligfield P, Gettes LS, Bailey JJ, et al. Recommendations for the standardization and interpretation of the electrocardiogram: part I: The electrocardiogram and its technology: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Electrocardiography and Arrhythmias Committee, Council on Clinical Cardiology; the American College of Cardiology Foundation; and the Heart Rhythm Society: endorsed by the International Society for Computerized Electrocardiology Circulation, 2007.PMID 17322457
- [2]de Zwaan C, Bär FW, Wellens HJJ Characteristic electrocardiographic pattern indicating a critical stenosis high in left anterior descending coronary artery in patients admitted because of impending myocardial infarction Am Heart J, 1982.PMID 6121481
- [3]de Winter RJ, Verouden NJW, Wellens HJJ, Wilde AAM A new ECG sign of proximal LAD occlusion N Engl J Med, 2008.PMID 18987380
- [4]Sgarbossa EB, Pinski SL, Barbagelata A, et al. Electrocardiographic diagnosis of evolving acute myocardial infarction in the presence of left bundle-branch block. GUSTO-1 (Global Utilization of Streptokinase and Tissue Plasminogen Activator for Occluded Coronary Arteries) Investigators N Engl J Med, 1996.PMID 8559200
- [5]Thygesen K, Alpert JS, Jaffe AS, et al. Fourth Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction (2018) Circulation, 2018.PMID 30571511