Skip to main content
MedVellum
QuestionsVideosPricing

MedVellum

Fellowship exam preparation across every specialty: source-verified topics, questions in every format, and videos.

Product

  • Specialties
  • Questions
  • Videos
  • Exam tools
  • Pricing

Verification & policy

  • Verified register
  • Editorial policy
  • Privacy
  • Terms

Account

  • Sign in
  • Create account
  • Dashboard
  • Account & billing

© 2026 MedVellum. For education only — not a substitute for clinical judgement.

llms.txtPsychiatry LLM catalogSitemap

Phys Written Answersgeneral-medicine

Phys Written Answers · general-medicine

Abdominal Examination Routine — Short Answer Question

DCE short-case preparation: structured written reasoning for the systematic abdominal examination routine, covering the twelve-step sequence, the interpretation of key physical signs, the differentiation of organomegaly, the evidence-based examination of ascites and AAA, and the oral presentation template, with model answers mapped to the FRACP DCE and MRCP PACES marking schemes.

4 min readVerification in progress

Target exams

FRACP DCEMRCP PACES
On this page
Study tools

Target exams

FRACP DCEMRCP PACES
Prompt
DCE short-case preparation: structured written reasoning for the systematic abdominal examination routine, covering the twelve-step sequence, the interpretation of key physical signs, the differentiation of organomegaly, the evidence-based examination of ascites and AAA, and the oral presentation template, with model answers mapped to the FRACP DCE and MRCP PACES marking schemes.

SAQ 1 — The Systematic Abdominal Examination Short Case (20 marks, 30 minutes)

Model Answer

(a) The twelve-step sequence and the rationale for auscultating before palpation (4 marks): [1]

The abdominal examination is a reproducible head-to-toe twelve-step routine: end of bed, hands, arms, face, neck, chest, inspection, auscultation (before palpation), palpation (light then deep, starting away from pain), percussion, additional examination (hernial orifices, PR, genitalia, stoma), and legs. [1]

The unique feature of the abdominal examination — in contrast to the cardiovascular and respiratory examinations — is that auscultation precedes palpation. The rationale is physiological: palpation and percussion physically disturb the bowel, potentially stimulating peristalsis and creating artefactual hyperactive sounds, or suppressing peristalsis and creating artefactual silence. Heart murmurs and breath sounds are generated by organs not mechanically altered by the examiner's hands, so the inspect-palpate-percuss-auscultate sequence is appropriate for those systems. Every examiner watches for this: the candidate who palpates before auscultating has demonstrated they do not understand the basis for the sequence change. [1]

(b) Interpretation of palmar erythema, spider naevi, and Dupuytren contracture (4 marks): [1]

Palmar erythema is a diffuse, blanchable erythema of the thenar and hypothenar eminences sparing the centre of the palm. It results from oestrogen excess due to impaired hepatic metabolism, causing peripheral vasodilation. It is non-specific (also seen in pregnancy, rheumatoid arthritis, hyperthyroidism) but supports chronic liver disease in context. [1]

Spider naevi are bright red, radiating vascular lesions with a central arteriole and capillary branches. The diagnostic test is blanching: press the centre with a glass slide and the entire lesion blanches, then refills from the centre outward. The distribution rule is critical: they appear only in the territory of the superior vena cava — face, neck, upper chest, shoulders, arms. More than five in the SVC distribution is significant. The Udell systematic review found spider naevi have a specificity of approximately 95 per cent for cirrhosis in the appropriate clinical context [5]. They also occur in pregnancy and with oral contraceptive use (both oestrogen-excess states).

Physician Medicine Pro

Continue reading

You have read the opening of this written answer. The complete unit — every section and its primary-source references — is part of the Physician Medicine fellowship library.

Sign in to continueSee pricing
References5ShowHide
  1. [1]Williams JW Jr, Simel DL The rational clinical examination. Does this patient have ascites? How to divine fluid in the abdomen JAMA, 1992.PMID 1573754
  2. [2]Grover SA, Barkun AN, Sackett DL The rational clinical examination. Does this patient have splenomegaly? JAMA, 1993.PMID 8411607
  3. [3]Naylor CD The rational clinical examination. Physical examination of the liver JAMA, 1994.PMID 8196144
  4. [4]Lederle FA, Simel DL The rational clinical examination. Does this patient have abdominal aortic aneurysm? JAMA, 1999.PMID 9892455
  5. [5]Udell JA, Wang CS, Tinmouth J, et al. Does this patient with liver disease have cirrhosis? JAMA, 2012.PMID 22357834
Physician Medicine Pro

$29/ monthor $279 / year

The complete Physician Medicine library, every exam format, one subscription.

  • Complete library for one chosen specialty
  • Timed MCQ mock exams and spaced review
  • Clinical cases & cross-table vivas
See pricingSign in
NextAnaphylaxis — Written Clinical Reasoninggeneral-medicine