Phys Clinical Cases · general-medicine
Medical Ethics, Capacity and Consent — DCE Clinical Case
DCE long-case clinical station: comprehensive assessment of a 78-year-old woman with advanced Alzheimer disease and aspiration pneumonia whose enduring guardian son demands intensive care the team considers futile — covering the capacity assessment (two-stage test, four functional abilities), the best-interests framework (substituted judgement standard), the goals-of-care conversation with the son, the ceiling of treatment (do not resuscitate but do not abandon), the role of the substitute decision-maker, and the escalation pathway to the guardianship tribunal — structured for FRACP DCE and MRCP PACES.
8 min readVerification in progress
On this page
Study tools
Target exams
FRACP DCEMRCP PACES
Prompt
DCE long-case clinical station: comprehensive assessment of a 78-year-old woman with advanced Alzheimer disease and aspiration pneumonia whose enduring guardian son demands intensive care the team considers futile — covering the capacity assessment (two-stage test, four functional abilities), the best-interests framework (substituted judgement standard), the goals-of-care conversation with the son, the ceiling of treatment (do not resuscitate but do not abandon), the role of the substitute decision-maker, and the escalation pathway to the guardianship tribunal — structured for FRACP DCE and MRCP PACES.
Medical Ethics, Capacity and Consent — Clinical Case
References6ShowHide
- [1]Appelbaum PS Clinical practice. Assessment of patients' competence to consent to treatment N Engl J Med, 2007.PMID 17978292
- [2]Appelbaum PS, Grisso T Assessing patients' capacities to consent to treatment N Engl J Med, 1988.PMID 3200278
- [3]Grisso T, Appelbaum PS, Hill-Fotouhi C The MacCAT-T: a clinical tool to assess patients' capacities to make treatment decisions Psychiatr Serv, 1997.PMID 9355168
- [4]The SUPPORT Principal Investigators A controlled trial to improve care for seriously ill hospitalized patients. The study to understand prognoses and preferences for outcomes and risks of treatments (SUPPORT). The SUPPORT Principal Investigators JAMA, 1995.PMID 7474243
- [5]Brinkman-Stoppelenburg A, Rietjens JA, van der Heide A The effects of advance care planning on end-of-life care: a systematic review Palliat Med, 2014.PMID 24651708
- [6]Baile WF, Buckman R, Lenzi R, Glober G, Beale EA, Kudelka AP SPIKES-A six-step protocol for delivering bad news: application to the patient with cancer Oncologist, 2000.PMID 10964998