Skip to main content
MedVellum
QuestionsVideosPricing

MedVellum

Fellowship exam preparation across every specialty: source-verified topics, questions in every format, and videos.

Product

  • Specialties
  • Questions
  • Videos
  • Exam tools
  • Pricing

Verification & policy

  • Verified register
  • Editorial policy
  • Privacy
  • Terms

Account

  • Sign in
  • Create account
  • Dashboard
  • Account & billing

© 2026 MedVellum. For education only — not a substitute for clinical judgement.

llms.txtPsychiatry LLM catalogSitemap

Paeds Vivasgrowth-development-and-behaviour

Paeds Vivas · growth-development-and-behaviour

Sensory processing differences — branching viva

Structured oral on sensory classification, ASD evidence, OT interventions and ethics of tactile defensiveness.

branching clinical structured oral1 min readVerification in progress

Target exams

RACP DCEMRCPCH Clinical
On this page
Study tools

Target exams

RACP DCEMRCPCH Clinical
Prompt
Outpatient clinic: school-age child with noise and touch sensitivities; examiner probes formulation and management.

Write your answer

Saved on this device. No marking — you are the marker.

Stem

You see a school-age child with sensory concerns. [1]

Examiner: What are sensory processing differences? [1]

Strong answer: Dimensional ways of responding to sensory input that impair participation. Useful teaching patterns include over-responsivity, under-responsivity and seeking. SPD as a stand-alone label is contested; function first. [1]

Examiner: How common are sensory symptoms in autism? [2]

Strong answer: Meta-analyses show elevated sensory modulation symptoms in ASD, confirmed in later updates — clinically important but not pathognomonic alone. [2] [3]

Examiner: First-line management? [4]

Strong answer: Map contexts, exclude medical mimics, change environment, school adjustments, OT for participation goals, treat comorbidity. Do not promise cure. [4]

Examiner: What about Ayres sensory integration evidence? [4]

Strong answer: Mixed/evolving. Systematic reviews urge caution; trials and comparative studies continue. Measure play, self-care and school function. [4] [11]

Examiner: Caregivers refuse a needed procedure because of touch sensitivity. [10]

Strong answer: Tactile defensiveness is not an ethical reason to abandon indicated care. Adapt preparation and supports; proceed safely. [10]

References6ShowHide
  1. [1]Miller LJ Concept evolution in sensory integration: a proposed nosology for diagnosis The American journal of occupational therapy, 2007.PMID 17436834
  2. [2]Ben-Sasson A A meta-analysis of sensory modulation symptoms in individuals with autism spectrum disorders Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 2009.PMID 18512135
  3. [3]Ben-Sasson A Update of a Meta-analysis of Sensory Symptoms in ASD: A New Decade of Research Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 2019.PMID 31501953
  4. [4]Case-Smith J A systematic review of sensory processing interventions for children with autism spectrum disorders Autism, 2015.PMID 24477447
  5. [10]Wolfe ID Should Tactile Defensiveness Exclude a Life-Sustaining Intervention in an Adolescent With Autism? Pediatrics, 2022.PMID 35229117
  6. [11]Schaaf RC A Comparative Trial of Occupational Therapy Using Ayres Sensory Integration and Applied Behavior Analysis Interventions for Autistic Children Autism research, 2025.PMID 40815044
Paediatrics Fellowship Pro

$29/ monthor $279 / year

The complete Paediatrics Fellowship library, every exam format, one subscription.

  • Complete library for one chosen specialty
  • Timed MCQ mock exams and spaced review
  • Clinical cases & cross-table vivas
See pricingSign in
PreviousSchool refusal and school attendance problems — branching vivagrowth-development-and-behaviourNextSocial communication concerns — branching vivagrowth-development-and-behaviour