Skip to main content
MedVellum
QuestionsVideosPricing

MedVellum

Fellowship exam preparation across every specialty: source-verified topics, questions in every format, and videos.

Product

  • Specialties
  • Questions
  • Videos
  • Exam tools
  • Pricing

Verification & policy

  • Verified register
  • Editorial policy
  • Privacy
  • Terms

Account

  • Sign in
  • Create account
  • Dashboard
  • Account & billing

© 2026 MedVellum. For education only — not a substitute for clinical judgement.

llms.txtPsychiatry LLM catalogSitemap

Paeds Vivasprofessional-practice-and-evidence

Paeds Vivas · professional-practice-and-evidence

Research ethics and assent in paediatric research — branching viva

Branching structured oral on paediatric research ethics: permission versus assent versus consent, the risk-benefit categories of Subpart D, therapeutic misconception, deferred consent in emergency research, payment and biobank ethics across common and high-stakes scenarios.

branching clinical structured oral3 min readVerification in progress

Target exams

RACP General PaediatricsRACP DCEMRCPCH ClinicalRCPSC Pediatrics
On this page
Study tools

Target exams

RACP General PaediatricsRACP DCEMRCPCH ClinicalRCPSC Pediatrics
Prompt
You are the paediatric registrar asked to advise on research encounters across the service: a non-beneficial physiology study in school-age children, a phase I oncology trial, a resuscitation trial needing deferred consent, and an adolescent mental-health study with payment. The examiner will probe the terminology, the risk-benefit categories, therapeutic misconception, and the limits of permission and assent.

Stem

You are advising on research encounters across an acute and chronic paediatric service. The examiner will challenge the terminology, the risk-benefit categories, and the limits of permission and assent. [1] [2]

Paediatrics Fellowship Pro

Continue reading

You have read the opening of this viva. The complete unit — every section and its primary-source references — is part of the Paediatrics Fellowship fellowship library.

Sign in to continueSee pricing
References7ShowHide
  1. [1]Shah S, Whittle A, Wilfond B, Gensler G, Wendler D How do institutional review boards apply the federal risk and benefit standards for pediatric research? JAMA, 2004.PMID 14747505
  2. [2]Wendler DS Assent in paediatric research: theoretical and practical considerations J Med Ethics, 2006.PMID 16574878
  3. [3]Wiener L, Viola A, Wilfond BS, et al. Contrasting views of risk perception and influence of financial compensation between adolescent research participants and their parents J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics, 2015.PMID 25742666
  4. [4]Kopelman LM Using the minimal risk threshold for all no-benefit pediatric studies Am J Bioeth, 2014.PMID 25127267
  5. [5]Unguru Y Ethical Challenges in Early-Phase Pediatric Research for Life-Limiting Illness Semin Pediatr Neurol, 2015.PMID 26358428
  6. [6]Moler FW, Silverstein FS, Holubkov R, et al Rationale, timeline, study design, and protocol overview of the therapeutic hypothermia after pediatric cardiac arrest trials Pediatr Crit Care Med, 2013.PMID 23842585
  7. [7]Marron JM, Cronin AM, DuBois SG, et al. Duality of purpose: Participant and parent understanding of the purpose of genomic tumor profiling research among children and young adults with solid tumors JCO Precis Oncol, 2019.PMID 31240271
Paediatrics Fellowship Pro

$29/ monthor $279 / year

The complete Paediatrics Fellowship library, every exam format, one subscription.

  • Complete library for one chosen specialty
  • Timed MCQ mock exams and spaced review
  • Clinical cases & cross-table vivas
See pricingSign in
PreviousRefusal of treatment and disagreement over care — branching vivaprofessional-practice-and-evidenceNextShared decision-making and assent in children — branching vivaprofessional-practice-and-evidence