Paeds Vivas · rheumatology-musculoskeletal-and-sports
Pre-participation sports evaluation — branching viva
Branching viva on the pre-participation sports evaluation: reproducing the AHA 14-element cardiovascular history and examination, recognising the exertional syncope and family-history red flags, weighing the history-versus-ECG screening debate, staging the elevated blood pressure, and framing the clearance decision and the emergency action plan with defibrillator access.
On this page
Study tools
Target exams
Branching framework
Open with the one-sentence framing and the goal of the evaluation. The pre-participation sports evaluation screens a child or adolescent before sport to detect the conditions that threaten life or limb and to promote safe participation, and the fellowship task is to take the AHA 14-element cardiovascular history, to recognise the red-flag items, and to classify the clearance. State the three-part framing — the screen detects the threat, the clearance promotes safe participation, and the emergency action plan protects when the screen misses — before you discuss any single athlete. [1] [3]
Reproduce the AHA 14-element screen and its 7-3-4 split. The fourteen elements divide into seven personal history items, three family history items, and four physical examination items. The seven personal items are exertional chest pain, unexplained syncope or near-syncope, excessive dyspnea or fatigue with exercise, a prior heart murmur, an elevated blood pressure, a prior restriction from sport, and prior cardiac testing. The three family items are a sudden death before fifty, disability from heart disease in a close relative under fifty, and a known familial cardiomyopathy or channelopathy. The four examination items are the murmur supine and standing, the femoral pulses, the stigmata of Marfan syndrome, and the brachial blood pressure. [1]
Branch to the exertional syncope red flag and the first athlete. A blackout during a sprint is exertional syncope, and exertional syncope is sudden cardiac death until proven otherwise. Combined with the paternal uncle's sudden death at forty-one, this athlete has two positive elements and is restricted from sport pending an electrocardiogram, an echocardiogram and a cardiology opinion. State that clearing him as dehydrated and reviewing later is the error that costs the life, because the next exertional event may be the fatal one. [3]
References4ShowHide
- [1]Maron BJ, Thompson PD, Ackerman MJ, et al. Recommendations and considerations related to preparticipation screening for cardiovascular abnormalities in competitive athletes: 2007 update. Circulation, 2007.PMID 17353433
- [3]Drezner JA, O'Connor FG, Harmon KG, et al. AMSSM Position Statement on Cardiovascular Preparticipation Screening in Athletes: Current evidence, knowledge gaps, recommendations and future directions. Br J Sports Med, 2017.PMID 27660369
- [4]Corrado D, Basso C, Pavei A, Michieli P, Schiavon M, Thiene G. Trends in sudden cardiovascular death in young competitive athletes after implementation of a preparticipation screening program. JAMA, 2006.PMID 17018804
- [7]Flynn JT, Kaelber DC, Baker-Smith CM, et al. Clinical Practice Guideline for Screening and Management of High Blood Pressure in Children and Adolescents. Pediatrics, 2017.PMID 28827377