Skip to main content
MedVellum
QuestionsVideosPricing

MedVellum

Fellowship exam preparation across every specialty: source-verified topics, questions in every format, and videos.

Product

  • Specialties
  • Questions
  • Videos
  • Exam tools
  • Pricing

Verification & policy

  • Verified register
  • Editorial policy
  • Privacy
  • Terms

Account

  • Sign in
  • Create account
  • Dashboard
  • Account & billing

© 2026 MedVellum. For education only — not a substitute for clinical judgement.

llms.txtPsychiatry LLM catalogSitemap

Paeds Vivasrheumatology-musculoskeletal-and-sports

Paeds Vivas · rheumatology-musculoskeletal-and-sports

Pre-participation sports evaluation — branching viva

Branching viva on the pre-participation sports evaluation: reproducing the AHA 14-element cardiovascular history and examination, recognising the exertional syncope and family-history red flags, weighing the history-versus-ECG screening debate, staging the elevated blood pressure, and framing the clearance decision and the emergency action plan with defibrillator access.

branching clinical structured oral3 min readVerification in progress

Target exams

RACP DCEMRCPCH ClinicalRCPSC Pediatrics
On this page
Study tools

Target exams

RACP DCEMRCPCH ClinicalRCPSC Pediatrics
Prompt
A fifteen-year-old basketball player presents for a pre-participation evaluation. He blacked out briefly during a sprint last month and his paternal uncle died suddenly at forty-one, while a separate sixteen-year-old cross-country runner has a blood pressure of 132 over 84 and an otherwise negative screen. The examiner asks: what is the AHA 14-element screen, how do you interpret the red flags, how do you stage the blood pressure, and what is the clearance decision — then branches to the history-versus-ECG controversy, the standing murmur examination, the emergency action plan, and the athlete's-heart-versus-cardiomyopathy distinction.

Branching framework

Open with the one-sentence framing and the goal of the evaluation. The pre-participation sports evaluation screens a child or adolescent before sport to detect the conditions that threaten life or limb and to promote safe participation, and the fellowship task is to take the AHA 14-element cardiovascular history, to recognise the red-flag items, and to classify the clearance. State the three-part framing — the screen detects the threat, the clearance promotes safe participation, and the emergency action plan protects when the screen misses — before you discuss any single athlete. [1] [3]

Reproduce the AHA 14-element screen and its 7-3-4 split. The fourteen elements divide into seven personal history items, three family history items, and four physical examination items. The seven personal items are exertional chest pain, unexplained syncope or near-syncope, excessive dyspnea or fatigue with exercise, a prior heart murmur, an elevated blood pressure, a prior restriction from sport, and prior cardiac testing. The three family items are a sudden death before fifty, disability from heart disease in a close relative under fifty, and a known familial cardiomyopathy or channelopathy. The four examination items are the murmur supine and standing, the femoral pulses, the stigmata of Marfan syndrome, and the brachial blood pressure. [1]

Branch to the exertional syncope red flag and the first athlete. A blackout during a sprint is exertional syncope, and exertional syncope is sudden cardiac death until proven otherwise. Combined with the paternal uncle's sudden death at forty-one, this athlete has two positive elements and is restricted from sport pending an electrocardiogram, an echocardiogram and a cardiology opinion. State that clearing him as dehydrated and reviewing later is the error that costs the life, because the next exertional event may be the fatal one. [3]

Paediatrics Fellowship Pro

Continue reading

You have read the opening of this viva. The complete unit — every section and its primary-source references — is part of the Paediatrics Fellowship fellowship library.

Sign in to continueSee pricing
References4ShowHide
  1. [1]Maron BJ, Thompson PD, Ackerman MJ, et al. Recommendations and considerations related to preparticipation screening for cardiovascular abnormalities in competitive athletes: 2007 update. Circulation, 2007.PMID 17353433
  2. [3]Drezner JA, O'Connor FG, Harmon KG, et al. AMSSM Position Statement on Cardiovascular Preparticipation Screening in Athletes: Current evidence, knowledge gaps, recommendations and future directions. Br J Sports Med, 2017.PMID 27660369
  3. [4]Corrado D, Basso C, Pavei A, Michieli P, Schiavon M, Thiene G. Trends in sudden cardiovascular death in young competitive athletes after implementation of a preparticipation screening program. JAMA, 2006.PMID 17018804
  4. [7]Flynn JT, Kaelber DC, Baker-Smith CM, et al. Clinical Practice Guideline for Screening and Management of High Blood Pressure in Children and Adolescents. Pediatrics, 2017.PMID 28827377
Paediatrics Fellowship Pro

$29/ monthor $279 / year

The complete Paediatrics Fellowship library, every exam format, one subscription.

  • Complete library for one chosen specialty
  • Timed MCQ mock exams and spaced review
  • Clinical cases & cross-table vivas
See pricingSign in
PreviousPerthes disease — branching vivarheumatology-musculoskeletal-and-sportsNextPrimary immunodeficiency with rheumatic manifestations — branching vivarheumatology-musculoskeletal-and-sports