Paeds Vivas · pain-palliative-and-end-of-life-care
Pain assessment across developmental and cognitive abilities — branching viva
Branching viva on paediatric pain assessment: self-report as the gold standard with the Faces Pain Scale-Revised and the Numerical Rating Scale; FLACC for the two-month to seven-year-old; the revised FLACC and the Non-communicating Children's Pain Checklist for cognitive impairment; COMFORT-behaviour in the PICU; the under-assessment traps of the quiet, freeze, habituated, sedated and paralysed child; and pain as the fifth vital sign with reassessment against the predicted response.
On this page
Study tools
Target exams
Opening (warm-up)
Examiner: A four-year-old is admitted overnight after a scald and lies still and silent; the registrar documents "comfortable," but the nurse scores seven out of ten. Walk me through how you assess this child's pain. [2]
Candidate: I start from the principle that self-report is the gold standard and that absence of behavioural signs is not absence of pain. For this four-year-old I ask the child first, offering the Faces Pain Scale-Revised, which is validated from about four to five years, and I read the self-report alongside behaviour. If self-report is not possible I score with FLACC — Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability, total out of ten — validated from two months to about seven years for acute and postoperative pain. The reason I do not trust the "comfortable" impression is that a young child in severe pain can freeze rather than cry, become still rather than thrash, and withdraw rather than seek comfort; the freeze response looks like comfort but marks severe pain, and autonomic signs habituate so observations can be normal. The seven-out-of-ten score and the clinical context — a fresh scald — justify analgesia, and I reassess against the predicted response and document the trend as the fifth vital sign. [1] [2]
References8ShowHide
- [1]Merkel SI, Voepel-Lewis T, Shayevitz JR, Malviya S The FLACC: a behavioral scale for scoring postoperative pain in young children. Pediatr Nurs, 1997.PMID 9220806
- [2]Crellin DJ, Harrison D, Santamaria N, Babl FE Systematic review of the Face, Legs, Activity, Cry and Consolability scale for assessing pain in infants and children: is it reliable, valid, and feasible for use? Pain, 2015.PMID 26207651
- [3]Hicks CL, von Baeyer CL, Spafford PA, van Korlaar I, Goodenough B The Faces Pain Scale-Revised: toward a common metric in pediatric pain measurement. Pain, 2001.PMID 11427329
- [5]von Baeyer CL, Spagrud LJ, McCormick JC, Choo E, Neville K, Connelly MA Three new datasets supporting use of the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS-11) for children's self-reports of pain intensity. Pain, 2009.PMID 19359097
- [6]Malviya S, Voepel-Lewis T, Burke C, Merkel S, Tait AR The revised FLACC observational pain tool: improved reliability and validity for pain assessment in children with cognitive impairment. Paediatr Anaesth, 2006.PMID 16490089
- [7]Breau LM, Finley GA, McGrath PJ, Camfield CS Validation of the Non-communicating Children's Pain Checklist-Postoperative Version. Anesthesiology, 2002.PMID 11873023
- [9]Pizzinato A, Liguoro I, Pusiol A, Cogo P, Palese A, Vidal E Detection and assessment of postoperative pain in children with cognitive impairment: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Eur J Pain, 2022.PMID 35271756
- [10]Ista E, van Dijk M, Tibboel D, de Hoog M Assessment of sedation levels in pediatric intensive care patients can be improved by using the COMFORT "behavior" scale. Pediatr Crit Care Med, 2005.PMID 15636661