Skip to main content
MedVellum
QuestionsVideosPricing

MedVellum

Fellowship exam preparation across every specialty: source-verified topics, questions in every format, and videos.

Product

  • Specialties
  • Questions
  • Videos
  • Exam tools
  • Pricing

Verification & policy

  • Verified register
  • Editorial policy
  • Privacy
  • Terms

Account

  • Sign in
  • Create account
  • Dashboard
  • Account & billing

© 2026 MedVellum. For education only — not a substitute for clinical judgement.

llms.txtPsychiatry LLM catalogSitemap

Paeds Vivasrheumatology-musculoskeletal-and-sports

Paeds Vivas · rheumatology-musculoskeletal-and-sports

Nursemaid's elbow and common upper-limb injury — branching viva

Branching viva on nursemaid's elbow and the common paediatric upper-limb injuries: recognising the classic traction history, reducing by hyperpronation on the Macias and Aksel evidence, omitting the radiograph in the classic case and reserving it for the atypical guarding arm, counselling to prevent recurrence, and branching to the Gartland-graded supracondylar with the lateral-entry pinning and the volar pulseless hand.

branching clinical structured oral2 min readVerification in progress

Target exams

RACP DCEMRCPCH ClinicalRCPSC Pediatrics
On this page
Study tools

Target exams

RACP DCEMRCPCH ClinicalRCPSC Pediatrics
Prompt
A two-year-old girl is carried in refusing to use her right arm forty minutes after her father lifted her by the wrist. She is well, holds the arm flexed and pronated, and has no swelling, deformity, or tenderness. The examiner asks: what is your diagnosis, what technique do you use to reduce it and why, do you need a radiograph — then branches to the evidence from the two randomised trials, the atypical guarding arm that needs the radiograph, the counselling to prevent recurrence, and finally the Gartland-graded supracondylar with the pulseless hand and the lateral-entry pinning.

Branching framework

Open with the one-sentence problem representation. This is a well child under five with a classic traction history and an arm held flexed and pronated, and this is a radial head subluxation until proven otherwise — a diagnosis made at the bedside, reduced at the bedside, and cured without a radiograph in the classic case. State the recognition aloud — the well child, the pulling history, the flexed and pronated posture, the absence of swelling and tenderness — before you discuss anything else. The examiner is listening for whether you reach for the reduction before you reach for the imaging. [1] [2]

Reduce by hyperpronation and name the evidence. The hyperpronation is the preferred first technique: the elbow is held, the forearm is fully pronated in one smooth, firm motion. The Macias 1998 randomised trial showed the first-attempt success of ninety-five per cent for the hyperpronation versus seventy-seven per cent for the supination-flexion, and the Aksel 2025 randomised trial of one hundred and nineteen children confirmed the lower first-attempt failure rate, a risk ratio of zero point four one favouring the hyperpronation. Be ready for the probe on the alternative: the supination-flexion, with the forearm supinated and the elbow flexed and a thumb over the radial head, is the cross-over when the hyperpronation fails. [1] [6]

Branch to the radiograph question. No radiograph is needed in the classic case — the diagnosis is clinical, and the reduction precedes the imaging. The radiograph is reserved for the atypical history, the point tenderness, the swelling, the deformity, or the failed reduction after both techniques. The Macias 2000 study showed that the non-classic history raises the relative risk of an underlying fracture, because the missed lateral condyle and the undisplaced supracondylar hide among the atypical, unreduced arms. The return of the normal arm use within fifteen to thirty minutes is the proof of success, whether or not a click was felt. [2]

Paediatrics Fellowship Pro

Continue reading

You have read the opening of this viva. The complete unit — every section and its primary-source references — is part of the Paediatrics Fellowship fellowship library.

Sign in to continueSee pricing
References4ShowHide
  1. [1]Macias CG, Bothner J, Wiebe R. A comparison of supination/flexion to hyperpronation in the reduction of radial head subluxations. Pediatrics, 1998.PMID 9651462
  2. [2]Macias CG, Wiebe R, Bothner J. History and radiographic findings associated with clinically suspected radial head subluxations. Pediatric Emergency Care, 2000.PMID 10698138
  3. [6]Aksel G, Küka B, İslam MM, et al. Comparison of supination/flexion maneuver to hyperpronation maneuver in the reduction of radial head subluxations: A randomized clinical trial. American Journal of Emergency Medicine, 2025.PMID 39579408
  4. [7]Abzug JM, Herman MJ Management of supracondylar humerus fractures in children: current concepts. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, 2012.PMID 22302444
Paediatrics Fellowship Pro

$29/ monthor $279 / year

The complete Paediatrics Fellowship library, every exam format, one subscription.

  • Complete library for one chosen specialty
  • Timed MCQ mock exams and spaced review
  • Clinical cases & cross-table vivas
See pricingSign in
PreviousMusculoskeletal examination and the limping child — branching vivarheumatology-musculoskeletal-and-sportsNextOsteomyelitis and discitis — branching vivarheumatology-musculoskeletal-and-sports