Paeds Vivas · cardiology
Ebstein anomaly and tricuspid valve disease — branching viva
Branching viva from the cyanosed neonate with a wall-to-wall heart, through the prostaglandin-E1-first resuscitation rule, the GOSE-scored severity triage and the cone-versus-Starnes surgical decision, to the adolescent with previously undiagnosed Ebstein presenting with palpitations, pre-excitation and an accessory pathway whose lifelong surveillance is set by the arrhythmia risk.
On this page
Study tools
Target exams
Stage 1 — The cyanosed neonate
The examiner shows you a two-day-old cyanosed neonate with a wall-to-wall heart on chest X-ray and a loud tricuspid regurgitant murmur. The oxygen saturation is sixty percent and does not rise with supplemental oxygen. [5]
-
What is your working diagnosis, and what bedside and radiographic features support it? Severe Ebstein anomaly with functional pulmonary atresia, supported by the huge heart, oligoaemic lungs, the murmur and oxygen-unresponsive cyanosis. [5]
-
What drug do you start immediately, at what dose, and why does it work? Prostaglandin E1 at 0.01 to 0.05 micrograms per kilogram per minute; it keeps the ductus arteriosus open to supply pulmonary blood flow while the pulmonary vascular resistance falls. [3]
-
What is the most dangerous side effect, and how do you manage it in transfer? Apnoea; the baby must travel intubated or with airway expertise. [3]
Stage 2 — The fetus with hydrops
The examiner moves to the antenatal clinic. A twenty-four-week fetus has Ebstein anomaly with ascites and skin oedema. [10]
-
How is fetal and neonatal severity graded, and what does the grade predict? The Great Ormond Street Echocardiography score grades severity one to four; scores of three and four and the presence of hydrops predict high mortality. [10]
-
What is the significance of hydrops, and what prenatal intervention may be considered? Hydrops carries the gravest prognosis; prenatal non-steroidal anti-inflammatory therapy may close a circular shunt and reverse hydrops in a specialist fetal centre. [3]
References12ShowHide
- [1]Ramcharan TKW; Goff DA; Greenleaf CE; et al Ebstein's Anomaly: From Fetus to Adult-Literature Review and Pathway for Patient Care. Pediatr Cardiol, 2022.PMID 35460366
- [2]Pasqualin G; Boccellino A; Chessa M; et al Ebstein's anomaly in children and adults: multidisciplinary insights into imaging and therapy. Heart, 2024.PMID 37487694
- [3]Konstantinov IE; Chai P; Bacha E; et al The American Association for Thoracic Surgery (AATS) 2024 expert consensus document: Management of neonates and infants with Ebstein anomaly. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2024.PMID 38685467
- [4]Holst KA; Connolly HM; Dearani JA Ebstein's Anomaly. Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J, 2019.PMID 31384377
- [5]Galea J; Ellul S; Schembri A; et al Ebstein anomaly: a review. Neonatal Netw, 2014.PMID 25161135
- [6]Burri M; Mrad Agua K; Cleuziou J; et al Cone versus conventional repair for Ebstein's anomaly. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2020.PMID 32711971
- [7]Neumann S; Rüffer A; Sachweh J; et al Narrative review of Ebstein's anomaly beyond childhood: Imaging, surgery, and future perspectives. Cardiovasc Diagn Ther, 2021.PMID 35070800
- [8]da Silva JP; Baumgratz JF; da Fonseca L; et al The cone reconstruction of the tricuspid valve in Ebstein's anomaly. The operation: early and midterm results. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2007.PMID 17198815
- [9]Delhaas T; Sarvaas GJ; Rijlaarsdam ME; et al A multicenter, long-term study on arrhythmias in children with Ebstein anomaly. Pediatr Cardiol, 2010.PMID 19937010
- [10]Yu JJ; Yun TJ; Won HS; et al Outcome of neonates with Ebstein's anomaly in the current era. Pediatr Cardiol, 2013.PMID 23494543
- [11]Thareja SK; Frommelt MA; Lincoln J; et al A Systematic Review of Ebstein's Anomaly with Left Ventricular Noncompaction. J Cardiovasc Dev Dis, 2022.PMID 35448091
- [12]Kumar SR; Kung G; Noh N; et al Single-Ventricle Outcomes After Neonatal Palliation of Severe Ebstein Anomaly With Modified Starnes Procedure. Circulation, 2016.PMID 27777295