Skip to main content
MedVellum
QuestionsVideosPricing

MedVellum

Fellowship exam preparation across every specialty: source-verified topics, questions in every format, and videos.

Product

  • Specialties
  • Questions
  • Videos
  • Exam tools
  • Pricing

Verification & policy

  • Verified register
  • Editorial policy
  • Privacy
  • Terms

Account

  • Sign in
  • Create account
  • Dashboard
  • Account & billing

© 2026 MedVellum. For education only — not a substitute for clinical judgement.

llms.txtPsychiatry LLM catalogSitemap

Paeds Casesprofessional-practice-and-evidence

Paeds Cases · professional-practice-and-evidence

Teaching, supervision and feedback OSCE — procedural error and the deteriorating registrar

Observed communication and supervision encounter testing structured feedback, the educational alliance, entrustment decisions, safe correction of practice and the struggling learner versus learner in difficulty distinction.

osce communication station2 min readVerification in progress

Target exams

RACP General PaediatricsRACP DCEMRCPCH ClinicalRCPSC Pediatrics
On this page
Study tools

Target exams

RACP General PaediatricsRACP DCEMRCPCH ClinicalRCPSC Pediatrics
Prompt
Station A is a registrar who failed a difficult cannulation on a distressed toddler; the candidate must run a structured feedback conversation. Station B is a previously competent registrar who has become withdrawn and is making errors; the candidate must distinguish a learner in difficulty from a struggling learner and arrange safe supervision.

Station objectives

  1. Run a structured feedback conversation using ask-tell-ask within an explicit educational alliance. [6] [9]
  2. Give specific, behaviour-focused feedback paired with a co-created action plan. [1] [2]
  3. Set a defensible entrustment and supervision level for a procedural task. [8] [5]
  4. Distinguish a learner in difficulty from a struggling learner and arrange safe, supportive supervision. [5] [7]
Paediatrics Fellowship Pro

Continue reading

You have read the opening of this case. The complete unit — every section and its primary-source references — is part of the Paediatrics Fellowship fellowship library.

Sign in to continueSee pricing
References9ShowHide
  1. [1]Ende J Feedback in clinical medical education JAMA, 1983.PMID 6876333
  2. [2]Archer JC State of the science in health professional education: effective feedback Med Educ, 2010.PMID 20078761
  3. [3]Telio S, Regehr G, Ajjawi R The educational alliance as a framework for reconceptualizing feedback in medical education Acad Med, 2015.PMID 25406607
  4. [4]Rudolph JW, Simon R, Rivard P, Dufresne RL, Raemer DB Debriefing with good judgment: combining rigorous feedback with genuine inquiry Anesthesiol Clin, 2007.PMID 17574196
  5. [5]Kilminster S, Cottrell D, Grant J, Jolly B AMEE Guide No. 27: Effective educational and clinical supervision Med Teach, 2007.PMID 17538823
  6. [6]Ramani S, Krackov SK Twelve tips for giving feedback effectively in the clinical environment Med Teach, 2012.PMID 22730899
  7. [7]Eva KW, Armson H, Holmboe E, Lockyer J, Loney E, Mann K, Sargeant J Factors influencing responsiveness to feedback: on the interplay between fear, confidence, and reasoning processes Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract, 2012.PMID 21468778
  8. [8]Ten Cate O, Chen HC, Hoff RG, Peters H, Bok H, van der Schaaf M Curriculum development for the workplace using Entrustable Professional Activities (EPAs): AMEE Guide No. 99 Med Teach, 2015.PMID 26172347
  9. [9]Lockyer J, Lee-Krueger R, Armson H, et al. Application of the R2C2 Model to In-the-Moment Feedback and Coaching Acad Med, 2023.PMID 37797303
Paediatrics Fellowship Pro

$29/ monthor $279 / year

The complete Paediatrics Fellowship library, every exam format, one subscription.

  • Complete library for one chosen specialty
  • Timed MCQ mock exams and spaced review
  • Clinical cases & cross-table vivas
See pricingSign in
PreviousSupporting a fatigued colleague after a near miss — OSCEprofessional-practice-and-evidenceNextTranslating an effect estimate into a shared decision — OSCEprofessional-practice-and-evidence