Skip to main content
MedVellum
QuestionsVideosPricing

MedVellum

Fellowship exam preparation across every specialty: source-verified topics, questions in every format, and videos.

Product

  • Specialties
  • Questions
  • Videos
  • Exam tools
  • Pricing

Verification & policy

  • Verified register
  • Editorial policy
  • Privacy
  • Terms

Account

  • Sign in
  • Create account
  • Dashboard
  • Account & billing

© 2026 MedVellum. For education only — not a substitute for clinical judgement.

llms.txtPsychiatry LLM catalogSitemap

Paeds Casesprofessional-practice-and-evidence

Paeds Cases · professional-practice-and-evidence

Research ethics and assent OSCE — paediatric trial enrolment and emergency deferred consent

Observed communication encounter testing permission versus assent terminology, risk-benefit categorisation, screening for therapeutic misconception, and management of a child's dissent and a deferred-consent emergency scenario.

osce communication station2 min readVerification in progress

Target exams

RACP General PaediatricsRACP DCEMRCPCH ClinicalRCPSC Pediatrics
On this page
Study tools

Target exams

RACP General PaediatricsRACP DCEMRCPCH ClinicalRCPSC Pediatrics
Prompt
Station A is a parent of an 8-year-old being invited into a non-beneficial physiology study, where the child has expressed reluctance. Station B is a registrar briefing a parent after their child was enrolled in a cardiac-arrest resuscitation trial under deferred consent.

Station objectives

  1. Use the correct terminology — parental permission, child assent, and consent — and seek assent at the right developmental level. [2]
  2. Categorise a study by its risk-benefit tier and explain what the ethics committee must find to approve it. [1] [3]
  3. Screen for therapeutic misconception before enrolment and correct it without extinguishing reasonable hope. [4]
  4. Explain a deferred-consent pathway to a family whose child was enrolled in an emergency trial, and offer the option to withdraw data. [5]
Paediatrics Fellowship Pro

Continue reading

You have read the opening of this case. The complete unit — every section and its primary-source references — is part of the Paediatrics Fellowship fellowship library.

Sign in to continueSee pricing
References5ShowHide
  1. [1]Shah S, Whittle A, Wilfond B, Gensler G, Wendler D How do institutional review boards apply the federal risk and benefit standards for pediatric research? JAMA, 2004.PMID 14747505
  2. [2]Wendler DS Assent in paediatric research: theoretical and practical considerations J Med Ethics, 2006.PMID 16574878
  3. [3]Kopelman LM Using the minimal risk threshold for all no-benefit pediatric studies Am J Bioeth, 2014.PMID 25127267
  4. [4]Unguru Y Ethical Challenges in Early-Phase Pediatric Research for Life-Limiting Illness Semin Pediatr Neurol, 2015.PMID 26358428
  5. [5]Moler FW, Silverstein FS, Holubkov R, et al Rationale, timeline, study design, and protocol overview of the therapeutic hypothermia after pediatric cardiac arrest trials Pediatr Crit Care Med, 2013.PMID 23842585
Paediatrics Fellowship Pro

$29/ monthor $279 / year

The complete Paediatrics Fellowship library, every exam format, one subscription.

  • Complete library for one chosen specialty
  • Timed MCQ mock exams and spaced review
  • Clinical cases & cross-table vivas
See pricingSign in
PreviousReading a paediatric trial result for a shared decision — OSCEprofessional-practice-and-evidenceNextResponding to a distressed child in the ED — OSCEprofessional-practice-and-evidence