Skip to main content
MedVellum
QuestionsVideosPricing

MedVellum

Fellowship exam preparation across every specialty: source-verified topics, questions in every format, and videos.

Product

  • Specialties
  • Questions
  • Videos
  • Exam tools
  • Pricing

Verification & policy

  • Verified register
  • Editorial policy
  • Privacy
  • Terms

Account

  • Sign in
  • Create account
  • Dashboard
  • Account & billing

© 2026 MedVellum. For education only — not a substitute for clinical judgement.

llms.txtPsychiatry LLM catalogSitemap

Paeds Casesprofessional-practice-and-evidence

Paeds Cases · professional-practice-and-evidence

Presenting and defending a quality improvement plan — OSCE

OSCE on designing and defending a paediatric quality improvement project using the Model for Improvement: aim, measures, PDSA testing, run-chart interpretation and sustainability, with attention to equity and evidence appraisal.

osce quality improvement planning3 min readVerification in progress

Target exams

MRCPCH ClinicalRACP DCERCPSC Pediatrics
On this page
Study tools

Target exams

MRCPCH ClinicalRACP DCERCPSC Pediatrics
Prompt
A neonatal unit has a 40% rate of infants receiving antibiotics beyond 48 hours without a proven infection; a registrar has proposed 'educating everyone and reauditing in a year'; the head of department has asked you, as the senior registrar, to present a proper quality improvement plan to the unit quality committee and defend your method.

Station brief (8–10 minutes)

The neonatal unit has a 40% rate of infants receiving antibiotics beyond 48 hours without a proven infection. A registrar has proposed simply "educating everyone and reauditing in a year." The head of department has asked you, the senior registrar, to present a proper quality improvement plan to the unit quality committee and to defend your method. You will be questioned on the aim, the measures, how you would test a change, how you would read the data, and how you would ensure the gains sustain and do not widen an equity gap. Do not invent local mandated targets. [1] [8]

Paediatrics Fellowship Pro

Continue reading

You have read the opening of this case. The complete unit — every section and its primary-source references — is part of the Paediatrics Fellowship fellowship library.

Sign in to continueSee pricing
References7ShowHide
  1. [1]Berwick DM A primer on leading the improvement of systems. BMJ, 1996.PMID 8595340
  2. [2]Berwick DM Developing and testing changes in delivery of care. Annals of internal medicine, 1998.PMID 9537939
  3. [5]Horbar JD, Rogowski J, Plsek PE, Delmore P Collaborative quality improvement for neonatal intensive care. NIC/Q Project Investigators of the Vermont Oxford Network. Pediatrics, 2001.PMID 11134428
  4. [8]Taylor MJ, McNicholas C, Nicolay C, Darzi A Systematic review of the application of the plan-do-study-act method to improve quality in healthcare. BMJ quality & safety, 2014.PMID 24025320
  5. [9]Thor J, Lundberg J, Ask J, Olsson J Application of statistical process control in healthcare improvement: systematic review. Quality & safety in health care, 2007.PMID 17913782
  6. [10]Ogrinc G, Armstrong GE, Dolansky MA, Singh MK SQUIRE-EDU (Standards for QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence in Education): Publication Guidelines for Educational Improvement. Academic medicine, 2019.PMID 30998575
  7. [13]Dukhovny D, Buus-Frank ME, Edwards EM, Ho T A Collaborative Multicenter QI Initiative to Improve Antibiotic Stewardship in Newborns. Pediatrics, 2019.PMID 31676682
Paediatrics Fellowship Pro

$29/ monthor $279 / year

The complete Paediatrics Fellowship library, every exam format, one subscription.

  • Complete library for one chosen specialty
  • Timed MCQ mock exams and spaced review
  • Clinical cases & cross-table vivas
See pricingSign in
PreviousPaediatric consultation with child, young person and family — communication OSCEprofessional-practice-and-evidenceNextReading a paediatric trial result for a shared decision — OSCEprofessional-practice-and-evidence