Skip to main content
MedVellum
QuestionsVideosPricing

MedVellum

Fellowship exam preparation across every specialty: source-verified topics, questions in every format, and videos.

Product

  • Specialties
  • Questions
  • Videos
  • Exam tools
  • Pricing

Verification & policy

  • Verified register
  • Editorial policy
  • Privacy
  • Terms

Account

  • Sign in
  • Create account
  • Dashboard
  • Account & billing

© 2026 MedVellum. For education only — not a substitute for clinical judgement.

llms.txtPsychiatry LLM catalogSitemap

Paeds Casesinvestigations-procedures-and-technology

Paeds Cases · investigations-procedures-and-technology

Verify a nasogastric tube before a feed — OSCE

OSCE clinical-decision and communication station: verifying a nasogastric tube at the bedside before a feed, applying the aspirate pH rule at a threshold of 5.5 or less, recognising and rejecting the deprecated whoosh test, deciding whether to feed or to escalate to radiography, documenting the verification correctly, and explaining the safety check and the Never Event risk to the nurse and the parent in plain language.

osce clinical decision and communication3 min readVerification in progress

Target exams

MRCPCH ClinicalRACP DCERCPSC Pediatrics
On this page
Study tools

Target exams

MRCPCH ClinicalRACP DCERCPSC Pediatrics
Prompt
A four-year-old boy recovering from a viral illness is on the ward with a nasogastric tube for short-term refeeding. The aspirate reads pH 6 on the indicator strip. The bedside nurse, who trained some years ago, asks whether she can save time by using the whoosh test to confirm the tube, and whether the feed can go down now. You have eight minutes to verify the tube at the bedside using the correct method, decide and defend whether to feed, document the verification, and explain the plan and the safety reason to the nurse and to the child's parent in plain language.

Candidate brief

You have eight minutes to verify a four-year-old's nasogastric tube before a feed. Use a structured approach: aspirate and test the pH with the indicator strip, read and state the exact value, decide and defend whether to feed or to escalate, document the verification correctly, and explain the plan and the safety reason to the bedside nurse and to the parent in plain language. The aspirate reads pH 6. [1]

Paediatrics Fellowship Pro

Continue reading

You have read the opening of this case. The complete unit — every section and its primary-source references — is part of the Paediatrics Fellowship fellowship library.

Sign in to continueSee pricing
References5ShowHide
  1. [1]Irving SY, Rempel G, Lyman B Pediatric Nasogastric Tube Placement and Verification: Best Practice Recommendations From the NOVEL Project. Nutr Clin Pract, 2018.PMID 30187517
  2. [3]Kisting MA, Korcal L, Schutte DL Lose the Whoosh: An Evidence-Based Project to Improve NG Tube Placement Verification in Infants and Children in the Hospital Setting. J Pediatr Nurs, 2019.PMID 30798144
  3. [4]Metheny NA, Krieger MM, Healey F A review of guidelines to distinguish between gastric and pulmonary placement of nasogastric tubes. Heart Lung, 2019.PMID 30665700
  4. [6]Metheny NA, Stewart BJ, Smith L pH and concentration of bilirubin in feeding tube aspirates as predictors of tube placement. Nurs Res, 1999.PMID 10414681
  5. [9]Taylor SJ Feeding tube safety: National guidance ignores the 'elephant in the room'. Int J Risk Saf Med, 2025.PMID 39973429
Paediatrics Fellowship Pro

$29/ monthor $279 / year

The complete Paediatrics Fellowship library, every exam format, one subscription.

  • Complete library for one chosen specialty
  • Timed MCQ mock exams and spaced review
  • Clinical cases & cross-table vivas
See pricingSign in
PreviousTwo samples, one site — bone marrow aspiration and biopsyinvestigations-procedures-and-technologyNext4-month health supervision OSCEpreventive-and-community-paediatrics