Counselling the family of a survivor starting hormone replacement — OSCE

A strong candidate frames the conversation around the three questions the parents are really asking — is the cancer back, what will we do, and what will happen — and addresses the fear of recurrence directly before anything else. The slowing growth is explained in plain language as a recognised and treatable consequence of the cranial radiation that cured the tumour, not a sign that the tumour has returned: the radiation that saved his life has slowed the gland that produces the growth signal, so the bones are not growing at the normal rate, and this was an expected and anticipated possibility at the three-year mark. The scheduled magnetic resonance imaging scan is framed as the routine confirmation of stable disease that must precede the growth hormone therapy, not as an investigation driven by a new suspicion of recurrence. ^{[1] [3]}

The therapy discussion covers the two hormone problems honestly and in sequence. The low cortisol is addressed first and framed as the more urgent of the two, because cortisol is what the body uses to cope with stress and infection: the boy will take a small daily dose of hydrocortisone to replace what his gland cannot make, and the parents are taught the sick-day rules — doubling or tripling the dose during a fever, and giving the emergency injection if he vomits or becomes unwell — because missing this is the one preventable emergency in his future. The growth hormone therapy is explained as a daily subcutaneous injection at bedtime to mimic the body's natural overnight signal, with the dose adjusted to a blood test (the IGF-1), and the family is reassured that the response is best when treatment is started early and taken consistently. ^[2]