Skip to main content
MedVellum
QuestionsVideosPricing

MedVellum

Fellowship exam preparation across every specialty: source-verified topics, questions in every format, and videos.

Product

  • Specialties
  • Questions
  • Videos
  • Exam tools
  • Pricing

Verification & policy

  • Verified register
  • Editorial policy
  • Privacy
  • Terms

Account

  • Sign in
  • Create account
  • Dashboard
  • Account & billing

© 2026 MedVellum. For education only — not a substitute for clinical judgement.

llms.txtPsychiatry LLM catalogSitemap

Paeds Casesprofessional-practice-and-evidence

Paeds Cases · professional-practice-and-evidence

Counselling a positive newborn screen — OSCE

OSCE on translating a positive newborn screen into a positive predictive value and a confirmatory plan with a family.

osce communication and shared decision3 min readVerification in progress

Target exams

MRCPCH ClinicalRACP DCERCPSC Pediatrics
On this page
Study tools

Target exams

MRCPCH ClinicalRACP DCERCPSC Pediatrics
Prompt
Parents of a well 10-day-old baby have been told by phone that the newborn bloodspot screen for a rare metabolic condition is positive; the test has a sensitivity of 99 percent and a specificity of 99 percent, and the condition affects 1 in 10,000 babies; they are frightened and asking whether their baby is sick.

Station brief (8–10 minutes)

The parents have received a phone call telling them their baby's newborn screen is positive for a rare metabolic condition. Help them understand what the result actually means, using the positive predictive value, and agree a plan for confirmation. Address their fear honestly, explain why a positive screen is not a diagnosis, and avoid conveying a diagnosis before the reference-standard test. Do not invent jurisdiction-specific programme thresholds or a specific survival statistic. [4]

Paediatrics Fellowship Pro

Continue reading

You have read the opening of this case. The complete unit — every section and its primary-source references — is part of the Paediatrics Fellowship fellowship library.

Sign in to continueSee pricing
References5ShowHide
  1. [1]Griner PF, Mayewski RJ, Mushlin AI, Greenland P Selection and interpretation of diagnostic tests and procedures. Principles and applications. Annals of internal medicine, 1981.PMID 6452080
  2. [4]Akobeng AK Understanding diagnostic tests 1: sensitivity, specificity and predictive values. Acta paediatrica, 2007.PMID 17407452
  3. [5]Akobeng AK Understanding diagnostic tests 2: likelihood ratios, pre- and post-test probabilities and their use in clinical practice. Acta paediatrica, 2007.PMID 17306009
  4. [9]Whiting PF, Rutjes AW, Westwood ME, et al. QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. Annals of internal medicine, 2011.PMID 22007046
  5. [13]Esserman LJ, Thompson IM, Reid B, et al. Addressing overdiagnosis and overtreatment in cancer: a prescription for change. Lancet oncology, 2014.PMID 24807866
Paediatrics Fellowship Pro

$29/ monthor $279 / year

The complete Paediatrics Fellowship library, every exam format, one subscription.

  • Complete library for one chosen specialty
  • Timed MCQ mock exams and spaced review
  • Clinical cases & cross-table vivas
See pricingSign in
PreviousCounselling a family toward high-value care — OSCEprofessional-practice-and-evidenceNextDeclining a boundary challenge from an adolescent patient — OSCEprofessional-practice-and-evidence