Skip to main content
MedVellum
QuestionsVideosPricing

MedVellum

Fellowship exam preparation across every specialty: source-verified topics, questions in every format, and videos.

Product

  • Specialties
  • Questions
  • Videos
  • Exam tools
  • Pricing

Verification & policy

  • Verified register
  • Editorial policy
  • Privacy
  • Terms

Account

  • Sign in
  • Create account
  • Dashboard
  • Account & billing

© 2026 MedVellum. For education only — not a substitute for clinical judgement.

llms.txtPsychiatry LLM catalogSitemap

Paeds Casesinvestigations-procedures-and-technology

Paeds Cases · investigations-procedures-and-technology

Three acts, one pathway — developmental assessment in clinic

A bedside structured clinical encounter testing the principle that surveillance, screening and diagnostic assessment are three different acts, the correct choice of tool for a toddler with speech and social-communication concern, the interpretation of a positive M-CHAT-R/F, the standard-score model, and the urgent response to regression with audiology in the work-up.

structured clinical encounter (developmental assessment and communication)2 min readVerification in progress

Target exams

RACP General PaediatricsRACP DCERCPCH Progress+MRCPCH ClinicalABP General PediatricsACGME PediatricsRCPSC Pediatrics
On this page
Study tools

Target exams

RACP General PaediatricsRACP DCERCPCH Progress+MRCPCH ClinicalABP General PediatricsACGME PediatricsRCPSC Pediatrics
Prompt
A 20-month-old is brought in because he has no words, does not point, and his mother believes he has lost the sounds he used to make. The candidate must distinguish surveillance from screening and diagnosis, choose the right tool, interpret a positive M-CHAT-R/F, defend the standard-score model, and escalate regression with audiology in the work-up while beginning early intervention.

Structured clinical encounter — developmental assessment and communication

This station tests whether the candidate structures developmental assessment correctly, chooses the right tool, interprets a screening result honestly, and escalates regression without prompting. Marks reward the three-acts principle, the M-CHAT-R/F threshold, the standard-score model, and the rule that a positive screen is a referral, never a diagnosis. [1] [5]

Stem

A 20-month-old boy is brought to the outpatient clinic by his mother. He has no words, does not point or show objects, and does not make eye contact. His mother says he used to babble and make a few sounds around 14 months but has become quieter over the last two months. He passed his newborn hearing screen. He is the first child of healthy parents, born at term without complication. The team looks to you. [5]

Candidate tasks

  1. Frame the assessment (2 minutes). Explain that developmental assessment is built on three acts — surveillance, screening and diagnostic assessment — and state the screening schedule that applies at this age. [1]
  2. Choose and interpret the tool (3 minutes). Perform an M-CHAT-R/F, state the screen-positive threshold (three or more of twenty items, or two or more critical items), and explain that a positive screen is a reason to refer, not a diagnosis. [5]
  3. Recognise the red flag (2 minutes). Identify the loss of babble and social engagement as regression, and explain why regression demands urgent diagnostic referral the same week rather than a repeat screen. [5]
  4. Order the work-up correctly (3 minutes). Refer for diagnostic developmental and autism assessment, check hearing and vision before cognitive assessment, and begin non-directive early intervention on need. [9]
  5. Communicate with the family (2 minutes). Explain honestly that the screen raises concern and warrants a closer look, that regression is taken seriously, and that support begins now. [1]
Paediatrics Fellowship Pro

Continue reading

You have read the opening of this case. The complete unit — every section and its primary-source references — is part of the Paediatrics Fellowship fellowship library.

Sign in to continueSee pricing
References6ShowHide
  1. [1]Council on Children With Disabilities, Section on Developmental Behavioral Pediatrics, Bright Futures Steering Committee, et al Identifying infants and young children with developmental disorders in the medical home: an algorithm for developmental surveillance and screening Pediatrics, 2006.PMID 16818591
  2. [3]Squires J, Bricker D, Potter L Revision of a parent-completed development screening tool: Ages and Stages Questionnaires Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 1997.PMID 9212550
  3. [5]Robins DL, Casagrande K, Barton M, Chen CM, Dumont-Mathieu T, Fein D Validation of the modified checklist for Autism in toddlers, revised with follow-up (M-CHAT-R/F) Pediatrics, 2014.PMID 24366990
  4. [7]Goodman R Psychometric properties of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 2001.PMID 11699809
  5. [9]Balasubramanian H, Ahmed J, Ananthan A, Srinivasan L Comparison of parent or caregiver-completed development screening tools with Bayley Scales of Infant Development: a systematic review and meta-analysis Archives of Disease in Childhood, 2024.PMID 38811056
  6. [10]Rah SS, Jung M, Lee K, Kang H Systematic Review and Meta-analysis: Real-World Accuracy of Children's Developmental Screening Tests Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 2023.PMID 36592715
Paediatrics Fellowship Pro

$29/ monthor $279 / year

The complete Paediatrics Fellowship library, every exam format, one subscription.

  • Complete library for one chosen specialty
  • Timed MCQ mock exams and spaced review
  • Clinical cases & cross-table vivas
See pricingSign in
PreviousSuprapubic aspiration and urinary catheterisation: Caseinvestigations-procedures-and-technologyNextThree tests at the bedside — point-of-care glucose, ketone and urinalysis in a sick childinvestigations-procedures-and-technology