O&G Vivas · Neonatal care — outcomes of prematurity
Prematurity outcomes — structured oral station (12 minutes)
FRANZCOG oral-format station on periviability counselling: candidate quotes the ANZNN 2023 number with its denominator, names the four levers, runs the counselling script, and defends the evidence. Scored against the eight published RANZCOG oral domains.
On this page
Study tools
Target exams
Station format
4 minutes reading, 12 minutes examination, 20 marks, global scoring. The eight published RANZCOG oral domains apply: history and examination; investigations and interpreting results; treatment/management; clinical knowledge; complex, urgent or unusual clinical presentations; rapport with patient, support person or colleague; respect; communication skills. [1]
Reveal the examiner script and model responsesShowHide
Opening prompt — "What are her baby's chances?"
Model response — say it in this order: [1]
- "ANZNN 2023 Table 29 reports survival to discharge home of 50.7% for babies born under 24 weeks. That is 71 of 140 babies admitted to a level III NICU. I would name to her that this figure excludes fetal deaths, deaths on the labour ward, level II births and babies never transferred — so the honest number for her fetus in utero is lower."
- "I would ask what she wants to know before I quote a percentage — some parents want every number, some want only to know if their baby will live."
- "I would state the range as a natural frequency: 'Of ten babies like yours at this gestation, about half go home.' And I would name what we can change in the next two hours."
- "I would convene the joint obstetric-neonatal conversation, agree with the neonatal team what we will offer at birth, and document the conversation."[1]
Probe 1 — "What are the four levers and what are you doing about each?"
- Steroids — first dose now, before transfer; the Cochrane review (Roberts 2017) shows benefit for perinatal death, neonatal death, RDS and IVH; a partial course still helps.
- Magnesium — start now if your protocol permits at 23+4; the Crowther 2017 IPD meta-analysis supports neuroprotection before 30 weeks.
- In-utero transfer — arrange now to the level III centre, in parallel with steroids and magnesium; outborn infants do worse (Fang 2020).
- Active treatment policy — know whether the receiving centre offers active resuscitation at 23+4; Rysavy 2015 showed this explains much of the variation in outcome at the threshold.[2][3][5][1]
Probe 2 — "She asks about disability. What do you say?"
- "ANZNN 2022 Table 45 reports moderate-to-severe functional impairment at 2 to 3 year follow-up in extremely preterm survivors — about one in five overall, falling from about three in ten at 24 weeks and below to about one in seven at 28 weeks and over."
- "I would name the construct: of the 688 infants in that table with moderate-to-severe impairment, 184 were classified on language delay alone. So 'moderate-to-severe impairment' is broader than 'cerebral palsy' implies."
- "I would say: 'Most babies who go home do not have severe disability. Some have difficulties that show up later — at school age, not at two years. We will follow your baby closely whatever happens at birth.'"[1]
Probe 3 — "What does the MAGENTA trial tell you?"
- "MAGENTA (Crowther, JAMA 2023) randomised women at 30 to 34 weeks at risk of preterm delivery to magnesium vs placebo, and did not show a significant reduction in death or cerebral palsy."
- "It bounds the magnesium recommendation — the benefit is at earlier gestations, typically before 30 weeks in ANZ practice. Extending routine use to 34 weeks is not supported."[4]
Probe 4 — "Her partner says: 'I've read on the internet that survival is 80% at this gestation.' How do you respond?"
Scored communication domain. [1]
- "I would not contradict him flatly. I would acknowledge his research, then say: 'The number you've found is likely survival for babies already admitted to a tertiary nursery — and probably for a slightly older gestation. Your baby is 23+4 weeks and still inside your partner, so the honest number for you is lower, around one in two of babies admitted to a NICU. Let me explain why the denominator matters.'"
- "I would state the range, name what we can change, name the uncertainty, and commit to revisiting the conversation."[1]
Probe 5 — "Why is in-utero transfer so important?"
- "Outborn extremely preterm neonates have higher mortality and morbidity than inborn — the Fang cohort (2020) reports this clearly. In-utero transfer is the single largest modifiable determinant of outcome for a woman presenting to a non-tertiary hospital."
- "It is pursued in parallel with steroids and magnesium, not instead of them. Tocolysis, if used, is a means to steroids and transfer, not an end in itself."[5]
References6ShowHide
- [1]Rysavy MA, Li L, Bell EF, et al. Between-hospital variation in treatment and outcomes in extremely preterm infants N Engl J Med, 2015.PMID 25946279
- [2]Roberts D, Brown J, Medley N, Dalziel SR Antenatal corticosteroids for accelerating fetal lung maturation for women at risk of preterm birth Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2017.PMID 28321847
- [3]Crowther CA, Middleton PF, Voysey M, Askie L Assessing the neuroprotective benefits for babies of antenatal magnesium sulphate: An individual participant data meta-analysis PLoS Med, 2017.PMID 28976987
- [4]Crowther CA, Ashwood P, Middleton PF, et al. Prenatal Intravenous Magnesium at 30-34 Weeks' Gestation and Neurodevelopmental Outcomes in Offspring: The MAGENTA Randomized Clinical Trial JAMA, 2023.PMID 37581672
- [5]Fang JL, Mara KC, Weaver AL, Carey WA Outcomes of outborn extremely preterm neonates admitted to a NICU with respiratory distress Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed, 2020.PMID 31079068
- [6]American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine ACOG Obstetric Care Consensus No. 3: Periviable Birth Obstet Gynecol, 2015.PMID 26488525