O&G Vivas · Gynaecological health — menstrual disorders
Postcoital bleeding — structured oral station (12 minutes)
FRANZCOG oral-format station on postcoital bleeding: candidate runs the structured assessment (pregnancy test, speculum, chlamydia NAAT, cervical screen), decides on colposcopy referral when PCB is persistent, and navigates the 'normal screen but symptomatic' trap. Scored against the eight published RANZCOG oral domains.
On this page
Study tools
Target exams
Station format
4 minutes reading, 12 minutes examination, 20 marks, global scoring. The eight published RANZCOG oral domains apply to every station: history and examination; investigations and interpreting results; treatment and management; clinical knowledge; complex, urgent or unusual clinical presentations; rapport with patient, support person or colleague; respect; communication skills. You are marked on how you behave, not only what you know. [2]
Reveal the examiner script and model responsesShowHide
Opening prompt — "She bled after sex last night. What is the first thing you do?"
- "PCB is a symptom, not a diagnosis — it points to a focal lesion. The first thing I do is exclude pregnancy with a urine or serum beta-hCG, then perform a speculum examination to visualise the cervix."
- "I take a structured history: bleeding pattern, menstrual and contraceptive history, sexual history (new partners — she has one), cervical screening status, red flags (persistent or recurrent PCB, postmenopausal bleeding, discharge, weight loss)."[1][2]
Probe 1 — "Her cervix looks normal. Her chlamydia NAAT is negative. Her last screen 1 year ago was HPV-negative. Do you reassure her?"
- "No. A single normal screen does not reassure in a symptomatic woman. Cervical screening is a population-level test for asymptomatic women — it is not diagnostic in a woman with persistent PCB."
- "I would perform a cervical screen now (HPV plus LBC co-test) and refer her for colposcopy, because recurrent or persistent PCB warrants gynaecology referral and colposcopy regardless of the screening result."
- "A normal-looking cervix does not exclude high-grade CIN or early cervical cancer — colposcopy with acetic acid is what reveals them."[1][3]
Probe 2 — "She is frightened it is cancer. How do you counsel her?"
Communication domain — demonstrate it out loud: [2]
- Move to her eye level, use her name, acknowledge the fear: "Your bleeding after sex needs investigation because at 36 with persistent symptoms we must rule out a serious cause — but most postcoital bleeding is benign, especially in a young woman. We will do the speculum and the screen today, and I will refer you for colposcopy to give a clear answer."
- Offer a clear plan and timeline, and a named contact for between visits.[2]
Probe 3 — "Colposcopy shows CIN 2. What now?"
- "CIN 2 is a high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion. The standard treatment is large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ), which is both diagnostic and therapeutic. I would counsel her on the procedure, the small risks (bleeding, infection, future cervical stenosis or preterm birth), and the surveillance pathway — HPV testing at follow-up intervals per the NCSP / NHS guidance."
- "I would also ensure her HPV vaccination status is current and discuss smoking cessation, which is a cofactor for CIN progression."[2]
Probe 4 — "Suppose instead she were 22 with a single episode of PCB and a normal cervix. How would your pathway differ?"
- "In a 22-year-old with a single episode of PCB, a normal-looking cervix and no risk factors, the most likely cause is chlamydia or an ectropion. I would do the speculum, the chlamydia NAAT and the screen, treat any infection, and safety-net — advise her to return if the PCB recurs or becomes persistent. I would not refer for colposcopy on a single episode in a low-risk young woman."
- "The threshold for colposcopy is persistent or recurrent PCB — not a single episode."[1][4]
Probe 5 — "She returns 6 months later with persistent IMB. How does that change the route?"
- "Persistent IMB in a perimenopausal woman (over 40) shifts the route to hysteroscopy plus endometrial biopsy (NICE NG88 1.3.4), because the endometrium is now the suspect rather than the cervix. The high-risk groups for biopsy (NICE NG88 1.3.10) include persistent IMB and irregular bleeding."
- "Colposcopy addresses the cervix; hysteroscopy addresses the endometrium. The route is chosen by where the lesion is most likely to be."[1]
References4ShowHide
- [1]Jain V, Munro MG, Critchley HOD Contemporary evaluation of women and girls with abnormal uterine bleeding: FIGO Systems 1 and 2. Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 2023.PMID 37538019
- [2]Marnach ML, Laughlin-Tommaso SK Evaluation and Management of Abnormal Uterine Bleeding. Mayo Clin Proc, 2019.PMID 30711128
- [3]Alfhaily F, Ewies AA Postcoital bleeding: a study of the current practice amongst consultants in the United Kingdom. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 2009.PMID 19329241
- [4]Bhatla N, Puri K, Joseph E, Kriplani A, Iyer VK, Sreenivas V Association of Chlamydia trachomatis infection with human papillomavirus (HPV) & cervical intraepithelial neoplasia - a pilot study. Indian J Med Res, 2013.PMID 23640561