O&G Vivas · Professional practice — patient safety and systems
Human factors, teamwork and leadership on labour ward — structured oral station (12 minutes)
FRANZCOG oral-format station on human factors and CRM on labour ward: the candidate demonstrates the five CRM skills, structured communication (SBAR/iSoBAR, closed-loop, graded assertion), error theory (Reason, Endsley), and the evidence base for obstetric team training (PROMPT, THISTLE, MBRRACE). Scored against the eight published RANZCOG oral domains.
On this page
Study tools
Target exams
Station format
4 minutes reading, 12 minutes examination, 20 marks, global scoring. The eight published RANZCOG oral domains apply to every station: history and examination; investigations and interpreting results; treatment and management; clinical knowledge; complex, urgent or unusual clinical presentations; rapport with patient, support person or colleague; respect; communication skills. You are marked on how you behave, not only what you know. [1]
Reveal the examiner script and model responsesShowHide
Opening prompt — "A pathological CTG at 02:40 with the team scattered. Talk me through your first move."
Model response — say it in this order: [1][9]
- "My first move is situation awareness: I confirm the CTG myself before I act, because Level 1 of Endsley's model is perception — gather the data, do not act on a summary. I then define the task: this woman may need expedited delivery."
- "I communicate using closed-loop orders. I ask the midwife to call the consultant at home and the senior in theatre, and I ask for the call to be read back to me so I know it has landed."
- "I escalate with graded assertion: if the senior cannot come immediately, I state clearly that I have a pathological CTG and I need a decision-maker at the bedside now."[4][9]
Examiner is listening for: the candidate names the CRM skill they are using, not just doing it. [5]
Probe 1 — "What is the difference between a slip and a lapse, and between active and latent failures?"
- "A slip is an action-based error — the right plan executed wrongly, like picking up the wrong syringe. A lapse is a memory-based failure — forgetting to give the next dose of a protocol. Both are skill-based errors." [1]
- "Active failures happen at the sharp end — the clinician at the bedside. Latent failures are the conditions the organisation created — staffing levels, equipment availability, fatigue, the layout of the ward. Reason's Swiss cheese model says the disaster only happens when an active failure passes through aligned holes in the latent defences." [1][2]
- "The management implication is the one examiners reward: you cannot remove human error, but you can build system defences that catch it — checklists, double checks, forcing functions, and a culture where the junior can speak up." [1]
Probe 2 — "The midwife is worried but hesitates to call the consultant. How do you fix that?"
- "This is a culture and graded assertion problem. I teach and model the CUS framework — 'I am Concerned, I am Uncomfortable, this is a Safety issue' — so that any team member has a script to escalate that cannot be ignored." [5]
- "Graded assertion has steps: hint, then suggestion, then assert, then the CUS-word. The senior who does not respond to CUS is the one in the next MBRRACE report. The fix is both individual (the junior rehearse the words) and organisational (the unit normalises speaking up)." [5][14]
Probe 3 — "How would you hand this patient over at shift change?"
- "I use iSoBAR: Identify the woman, Situation (pathological CTG, decision for category-1 caesarean), Observations (the latest vitals, bloods, CTG summary), Background (parity, risk factors, the obstetric history), Agreed plan (who is doing what, the time-critical steps), Read-back (the receiver repeats the plan so nothing is lost)." [9]
- "Closed-loop communication for any drug or action order: I say it, the receiver reads it back, I confirm. The single commonest communication failure Lingard found was information that was transmitted but never received or acted on." [8]
Probe 4 — "What is the evidence that team training actually improves outcomes?"
- "The Crofts shoulder dystocia RCT showed sustained skill retention at 6 and 12 months after a single 40-minute drill — training sticks when it is hands-on and multi-professional." [11]
- "The THISTLE stepped-wedge trial is the honest counter-example: PROMPT in 12 Scottish units did not significantly improve the primary outcome, because implementation fidelity varied. Training works when it is actually delivered, to the right people, with the right dose. The lesson for the station: training is necessary but not sufficient — local delivery and leadership matter." [13]
- "The WHO Surgical Safety Checklist showed mortality falling from 1.5% to 0.8% and complications from 11% to 7% across eight hospitals — a checklist is a human-factors tool, not a paperwork exercise." [17]
Probe 5 — "How do you debrief after the event?"
- "Hot debrief within minutes — stop, breathe, what did we just do, what went well, what would we change. It belongs to the team." [14]
- "Cold debrief within days — a structured, facilitated review of the timeline, the decisions, and the system factors. It belongs to the unit." [14]
- "I name the second victim: the clinician who carried the event needs peer support and follow-up. The MBRRACE themes — recognition, escalation, handover, ethnic disparity — are the curricular spine that the debrief should mine." [14]
References11ShowHide
- [1]Reason J Human error: models and management BMJ, 2000.PMID 10720363
- [2]Reason J Safety in the operating theatre - Part 2: human error and organisational failure Qual Saf Health Care, 2005.PMID 15692005
- [4]Wickens CD Situation awareness: review of Mica Endsley's 1995 articles on situation awareness theory and measurement Hum Factors, 2008.PMID 18689045
- [5]Flin R, Patey R Non-technical skills for anaesthetists: developing and applying ANTS Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol, 2011.PMID 21550546
- [6]Yule S, Flin R, Maran N, Rowley D, Youngson G, Paterson-Brown S Surgeons' non-technical skills in the operating room: reliability testing of the NOTSS behavior rating system World J Surg, 2008.PMID 18259809
- [8]Lingard L, Espin S, Whyte S, et al. Communication failures in the operating room: an observational classification of recurrent types and effects Qual Saf Health Care, 2004.PMID 15465935
- [9]Beament T, Ewens B, Wilcox S, Reid G A collaborative approach to the implementation of a structured clinical handover tool (iSoBAR), within a hospital setting in metropolitan Western Australian: A mixed methods study Nurse Educ Pract, 2018.PMID 30273803
- [11]Crofts JF, Bartlett C, Ellis D, Hunt LP, Fox R, Draycott TJ Management of shoulder dystocia: skill retention 6 and 12 months after training Obstet Gynecol, 2007.PMID 17978121
- [13]Lenguerrand E, Winter C, Siassakos D, et al. Effect of hands-on interprofessional simulation training for local emergencies in Scotland: the THISTLE stepped-wedge design randomised controlled trial BMJ Qual Saf, 2020.PMID 31302601
- [14]Liberati EG, Tarrant C, Willars J, et al. Seven features of safety in maternity units: a framework based on multisite ethnography and stakeholder consultation BMJ Qual Saf, 2021.PMID 32978322
- [17]Gawande AA A surgical safety checklist to reduce morbidity and mortality in a global population N Engl J Med, 2009.PMID 19144931