O&G Vivas · Gynaecological oncology — cervical
Cervical cancer — structured oral station (12 minutes)
FRANZCOG oral-format station on cervical cancer: the candidate assigns the FIGO 2018 stage with the IB subgroups and IIIC nodal substages, defends the chemoradiotherapy regimen with weekly cisplatin, explains the LACC-driven return to open surgery, and counsels honestly on prognosis. Scored against the eight published RANZCOG oral domains.
On this page
Study tools
Target exams
Station format
4 minutes reading, 12 minutes examination, 20 marks, global scoring. The eight published RANZCOG oral domains apply to every station: history and examination; investigations and interpreting results; treatment and management; clinical knowledge; complex, urgent or unusual clinical presentations; rapport with patient, support person or colleague; respect; communication skills. You are marked on how you behave, not only what you know. [1]
Reveal the examiner script and model responsesShowHide
Opening prompt — "Stage this tumour using FIGO 2018 and tell me why."
Model response — assign the stage with the verbatim definitions: [1]
- "This is Stage IIIC1 (r) — a 3.5 cm tumour with parametrial invasion and an enlarged right external iliac lymph node on MRI."
- "Under FIGO 2018, the tumour alone would be Stage IIB (parametrial invasion); the pelvic nodal disease upstages it to IIIC1, which is pelvic lymph node metastasis only. IIIC2 would be para-aortic."
- "The 'r' notation records that the nodal status was determined by imaging — radiological — rather than surgical pathology ('p')."[1]
Probe 1 — "What is the standard treatment for this stage?"
- "Concurrent chemoradiotherapy. EBRT 45 to 50 Gy to the pelvis in 25 to 28 fractions, with para-aortic field extension if nodes were involved; intracavitary brachytherapy boost to a total equivalent dose of at least 80 Gy; plus cisplatin 40 mg per square metre intravenously weekly during EBRT — typically 5 to 6 cycles — as a radiosensitiser." [2]
- "The CCCMAC meta-analysis of 18 randomised trials showed a 6 percent absolute 5-year survival benefit over radiotherapy alone. Surgery is not appropriate for Stage IIIC disease."
Probe 2 — "She is 38 and asks whether surgery could be offered to preserve her ovaries. How do you answer?"
- "For Stage IIIC1, surgery is not the treatment — chemoradiotherapy is curative-intent and superior to surgery for this stage. However, because the ovaries would be in the radiation field, I would offer laparoscopic ovarian transposition before chemoradiotherapy to move them out of the field and preserve ovarian function, given her young age."[1][2]
Probe 3 — "If instead her tumour were 1.5 cm Stage IB1 and she wished to preserve fertility, what would change?"
- "For a 1.5 cm Stage IB1 tumour, radical trachelectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy is the fertility-sparing option of choice. The cervix, parametrium and upper vagina are removed with pelvic lymphadenectomy; the uterine body and ovaries are preserved and a permanent cervical cerclage is placed."
- "Live-birth rates are 60 to 70 percent thereafter, with deliveries usually by caesarean; the principal obstetric risks are prematurity and second-trimester loss." [4]
- "For the radical hysterectomy candidate with early disease, the open abdominal approach is now the standard after LACC, which showed minimally-invasive radical hysterectomy had lower disease-free survival (86 vs 97 percent at 4.5 years) and higher recurrence." [3]
Probe 4 — Communication probe: "She asks what her chances are. What do you say?"
This is a scored communication domain — demonstrate it out loud: [1]
- "I would be honest and precise, and sit at her eye level: 'Stage IIIC1 cervical cancer is serious but treatable with curative intent. With chemoradiotherapy, the 5-year survival for Stage IIIC is approximately 30 to 45 percent — meaning that 1 in 3 to nearly 1 in 2 women are alive and well 5 years later. The treatment is demanding — about 6 weeks of daily radiotherapy plus weekly chemotherapy — but it gives you the best chance of cure. I will support you through every step, and we will have a dedicated team including a cancer nurse, a dietitian, and a counsellor.'"[1]
Probe 5 — "Two years later she has a central pelvic recurrence. What are the options?"
- "Investigate with imaging (MRI pelvis, PET-CT) and biopsy to confirm recurrence and exclude distant disease."[1]
- "For an isolated central pelvic recurrence after chemoradiotherapy in a fit patient, pelvic exenteration (anterior, posterior, or total) may be curative. This is a major undertaking and requires careful selection, counselling, and a multidisciplinary approach."
- "For recurrent disease not amenable to exenteration, systemic therapy with the GOG-240 triplet (cisplatin, paclitaxel, bevacizumab) plus pembrolizumab for PD-L1-positive disease is the standard."
References4ShowHide
- [1]Bhatla N, Berek JS, Cuello Fredes M, et al. Revised FIGO staging for carcinoma of the cervix uteri. Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 2019.PMID 30656645
- [2]Chemoradiotherapy for Cervical Cancer Meta-Analysis Collaboration (CCCMAC). Reducing uncertainties about the effects of chemoradiotherapy for cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data from 18 randomized trials. J Clin Oncol, 2008.PMID 19001332
- [3]Ramirez PT, Frumovitz M, Pareja R, et al. Minimally Invasive versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer. N Engl J Med, 2018.PMID 30380365
- [4]Sidonie M, et al. Oncologic, pregnancy, and reproductive outcomes of fertility-sparing surgery in early-stage cervical cancer: a systematic review. Surg Oncol, 2026.PMID 42114502