Skip to main content
MedVellum
QuestionsVideosPricing

MedVellum

Fellowship exam preparation across every specialty: source-verified topics, questions in every format, and videos.

Product

  • Specialties
  • Questions
  • Videos
  • Exam tools
  • Pricing

Verification & policy

  • Verified register
  • Editorial policy
  • Privacy
  • Terms

Account

  • Sign in
  • Create account
  • Dashboard
  • Account & billing

© 2026 MedVellum. For education only — not a substitute for clinical judgement.

llms.txtPsychiatry LLM catalogSitemap

O&G TopicsReproductive endocrinology & infertility

O&G · Reproductive endocrinology & infertility

Intrauterine adhesions and Asherman syndrome

Also known as Asherman syndrome · Intrauterine adhesions · IUA · Uterine synechiae · Traumatic amenorrhoea · Endometrial sclerosis · TCRA · Hysteroscopic adhesiolysis · AFS intrauterine adhesion classification

Exam-exhaustive FRANZCOG fellowship reference on intrauterine adhesions (IUA) and Asherman syndrome. Covers the pathophysiology (basal endometrial injury, dysregulated inflammation, fibrosis), the AFS/Nasr classifications, procedure-specific incidence (Munro 2025: 17% after pregnancy-loss evacuation, 16% after myomectomy, 28% after septum metroplasty; recurrence 35% after adhesiolysis), diagnosis (hysteroscopy gold standard, 3D ultrasound and saline infusion sonography first-line), hysteroscopic adhesiolysis (TCRA), and the prevention ladder — hyaluronic acid gel (Luo 2024, risk ratio 0.53), estrogen (Feng 2024 estrogen-releasing device), barriers, and emerging stem-cell therapies. RANZCOG-primary, globally tagged.

medium16 referencesUpdated 1 Aug 202611 min readVerification in progress

Practise this topic

  • 8 MCQs

Your progress

Saved on this device.

Practise this topic8 MCQs with explanations

Target exams

FRANZCOGMRCOGABOGFRCSCMRCPI

Red flags

  • Secondary amenorrhoea or hypomenorrhoea after any uterine instrumentation — curettage, post-partum evacuation, hysteroscopic surgery — with normal FSH, LH, oestradiol and prolactin: think Asherman, not a hormonal cause
  • A third of women reform adhesions after adhesiolysis without adjuvant prevention — never end the operation at resection alone; plan prevention and a second-look
  • Even after successful treatment, the underlying basalis injury persists and carries obstetric risk — preterm birth, placenta accreta spectrum, praevia, peripartum haemorrhage
  • Sharp or repeated curettage confers a higher adhesion risk than vacuum aspiration — prefer vacuum aspiration and image guidance at the index procedure
  • Recurrent implantation failure or recurrent pregnancy loss with a thin, irregular endometrium and a history of instrumentation — look for intrauterine adhesions before the next cycle
  • Severe, refractory Asherman after repeated adhesiolysis — regenerative therapies (stem-cell scaffolds) are emerging but investigational, not established
On this page
Study tools

Your progress

Saved on this device.

Practise this topic8 MCQs with explanations

Target exams

FRANZCOGMRCOGABOGFRCSCMRCPI

Red flags

  • Secondary amenorrhoea or hypomenorrhoea after any uterine instrumentation — curettage, post-partum evacuation, hysteroscopic surgery — with normal FSH, LH, oestradiol and prolactin: think Asherman, not a hormonal cause
  • A third of women reform adhesions after adhesiolysis without adjuvant prevention — never end the operation at resection alone; plan prevention and a second-look
  • Even after successful treatment, the underlying basalis injury persists and carries obstetric risk — preterm birth, placenta accreta spectrum, praevia, peripartum haemorrhage
  • Sharp or repeated curettage confers a higher adhesion risk than vacuum aspiration — prefer vacuum aspiration and image guidance at the index procedure
  • Recurrent implantation failure or recurrent pregnancy loss with a thin, irregular endometrium and a history of instrumentation — look for intrauterine adhesions before the next cycle
  • Severe, refractory Asherman after repeated adhesiolysis — regenerative therapies (stem-cell scaffolds) are emerging but investigational, not established
One-line fellowship answer

Intrauterine adhesions (IUA) are fibrous bands within the uterine cavity formed after trauma to the basal endometrium; Asherman syndrome is the clinical face — hypomenorrhoea or amenorrhoea, subfertility and recurrent pregnancy loss. Prevention is the most effective treatment: prefer vacuum aspiration over sharp curettage and use anti-adhesion gel barriers after hysteroscopic surgery. Diagnose with hysteroscopy (the gold standard) or 3D ultrasound / saline infusion sonography as less-invasive first-line. Treat with hysteroscopic adhesiolysis (TCRA), and prevent recurrence — because adhesions reform in about a third of women — with estrogen and/or barriers, reserving stem-cell scaffolds for refractory disease.[3][4][7][8]

A 29-year-old had a sharp curettage for a missed miscarriage six months ago. Her periods, which were always regular, have dwindled to two days of light staining, and she has not conceived since. Her FSH, LH, oestradiol, prolactin and TSH are normal, and she is not pregnant. The diagnosis is in the history — the instrumentation that damaged the basalis — and the question that follows is how to confirm it, restore the cavity, and stop the adhesions coming back. Asherman rewards the candidate who prevents first, resects precisely, and prevents again.[3][5]

Overview and definition

Intrauterine adhesions are fibrous bands within the uterine cavity, formed when trauma to the basal layer of the endometrium heals by scarring rather than regeneration. Asherman syndrome is the clinical syndrome that results — menstrual disturbance (hypomenorrhoea or amenorrhoea) and/or impaired fertility, including recurrent pregnancy loss, in a woman with intrauterine adhesions and a history of uterine instrumentation. Not every woman with adhesions has the syndrome; some are asymptomatic and are found on investigation.[1][4]

Three ideas anchor the topic. First, IUA is overwhelmingly iatrogenic — the dominant cause is trauma to the basalis, most often from curettage. Second, the basalis is the key structure: the functional endometrium regenerates from it each cycle, so its destruction breaks cyclical regeneration and leaves collagen-rich, poorly vascularised adhesions. Third, prevention outperforms treatment — the procedures that cause adhesions are the ones we can make safer, and the adhesiolysis we perform to treat them is itself adhesiogenic unless we add prevention.[3][4]

Obstetrics & Gynaecology Pro

Continue reading

You have read the opening of this topic. The complete unit — every section and its primary-source references — is part of the Obstetrics & Gynaecology fellowship library.

Sign in to continueSee pricing
References16ShowHide
  1. [1]The American Fertility Society The American Fertility Society classifications of adnexal adhesions, distal tubal occlusion, tubal occlusion secondary to tubal ligation, tubal pregnancies, müllerian anomalies and intrauterine adhesions Fertility and sterility, 1988.PMID 3371491
  2. [2]Nasr AL, Al-Inany HG, Thabet SM, Aboulghar M A clinicohysteroscopic scoring system of intrauterine adhesions Gynecologic and obstetric investigation, 2000.PMID 11014950
  3. [3]Munro MG, Salazar CA, Bhagavath B, Emanuel MH, Huddleston HG, Sobti D, Jaiswal AK, Gamburg R, Kumar J, Martin C, Hooker AB The epidemiology, clinical burden, and prevention of intrauterine adhesions (IUAs) related to surgically induced endometrial trauma: a systematic literature review and selective meta-analyses Human reproduction update, 2025.PMID 40914965
  4. [4]Ma H, Yang M A System Review of Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, and Clinical Management of Intrauterine Adhesions Obstetrical & gynecological survey, 2026.PMID 42241335
  5. [5]Hooker AB, de Leeuw RA, Twisk JWR, Brölmann HAM, Huirne JAF Reproductive performance of women with and without intrauterine adhesions following recurrent dilatation and curettage for miscarriage: long-term follow-up of a randomized controlled trial Human reproduction (Oxford, England), 2021.PMID 33320197
  6. [6]Hooker AB, Mansvelder FJ, Elbers RG, Frijmersum Z Reproductive outcomes in women with mild intrauterine adhesions; a systematic review and meta-analysis The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine, 2022.PMID 34044740
  7. [7]Luo Y, Sun Y, Huang B, Chen J, Xu B, Li H Effects and safety of hyaluronic acid gel on intrauterine adhesion and fertility after intrauterine surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis of randomized controlled trials American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 2024.PMID 38191020
  8. [8]Feng L, Sun Y, Zhang S, Qian Y, Fang S, Yang B, Xu L, Li J, Niu Y, Zhang S, Zhang L, Chen J A novel intrauterine estrogen-releasing system for preventing the postoperative recurrence of intrauterine adhesion: a multicenter randomized controlled study BMC medicine, 2024.PMID 39285313
  9. [9]Yang L, Ma N, Song D, Huang X, Zhou Q, Guo Y, Xia E, Shi X, Li TC The Effect of Estrogen in the Prevention of Adhesion Reformation after Hysteroscopic Adhesiolysis: A Prospective Randomized Control Trial Journal of minimally invasive gynecology, 2022.PMID 35439645
  10. [10]Liu L, Huang X, Xia E, Zhang X, Li TC, Liu Y A cohort study comparing 4 mg and 10 mg daily doses of postoperative oestradiol therapy to prevent adhesion reformation after hysteroscopic adhesiolysis Human fertility (Cambridge, England), 2019.PMID 29504823
  11. [11]Huang CY, Chang WH, Cheng M, Huang HY, Horng HC, Chen YJ, Lee WL, Wang PH Crosslinked Hyaluronic Acid Gels for the Prevention of Intrauterine Adhesions after a Hysteroscopic Myomectomy in Women with Submucosal Myomas: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Trial Life (Basel), 2020.PMID 32429137
  12. [12]Hou Z, Yang T, Xu D, Fu J, Tang H, Zhao J, Zhang Q, Chen J, Qin Q, Li W, Chen H, Li H, Guo L, Xu B, Li Y hUC-MSCs loaded collagen scaffold for refractory thin endometrium caused by Asherman syndrome: a double-blind randomized controlled trial Stem cells translational medicine, 2025.PMID 40371958
  13. [13]Gong X, Liu X Does prior hysteroscopic surgery for intrauterine adhesions impact pregnancy outcomes? A systematic review and meta-analysis of matched comparative studies The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine, 2025.PMID 40721355
  14. [14]Jackson MM, Edmonds KA, Jones-Cox CE Strategies to avoid recurrence of intrauterine adhesions after hysteroscopic adhesiolysis Current opinion in obstetrics & gynecology, 2025.PMID 40172533
  15. [15]Cao M, Pan Y, Zhang Q, You D, Feng S, Liu Z Predictive value of live birth rate based on different intrauterine adhesion evaluation systems following TCRA Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E, 2021.PMID 33482838
  16. [16]Guo Y, Shi X, Song D, Liu Y, Huang X, Xiao Y, Yang L, Xia E, Li TC The efficacy of auto-cross-linked hyaluronic acid gel in addition to oestradiol and intrauterine balloon insertion in the prevention of adhesion reformation after hysteroscopic adhesiolysis Reproductive biomedicine online, 2022.PMID 35760666

Test yourself

Practise what you just read

  • 8 MCQs
Obstetrics & Gynaecology Pro

$29/ monthor $279 / year

The complete Obstetrics & Gynaecology library, every exam format, one subscription.

  • Complete library for one chosen specialty
  • Timed MCQ mock exams and spaced review
  • Clinical cases & cross-table vivas
See pricingSign in
PreviousInfertility: assessment & investigation — NICE NG257 (2026), WHO 6th-edition semen criteria, and the structured couple workupReproductive endocrinology & infertilityNextIVF add-ons: evidence and the HFEA traffic-light system; fertility preservation in cancer, social egg freezing, and ovarian transpositionReproductive endocrinology & infertility