Skip to main content
MedVellum
QuestionsVideosPricing

MedVellum

Fellowship exam preparation across every specialty: source-verified topics, questions in every format, and videos.

Product

  • Specialties
  • Questions
  • Videos
  • Exam tools
  • Pricing

Verification & policy

  • Verified register
  • Editorial policy
  • Privacy
  • Terms

Account

  • Sign in
  • Create account
  • Dashboard
  • Account & billing

© 2026 MedVellum. For education only — not a substitute for clinical judgement.

llms.txtPsychiatry LLM catalogSitemap

O&G TopicsIntrapartum care — obstetric emergencies

O&G · Intrapartum care — obstetric emergencies

Uterine rupture and scar dehiscence

Also known as Uterine rupture · Scar dehiscence · Uterine window · Incomplete uterine rupture · Ruptured uterus · VBAC complications

Exam-exhaustive FRANZCOG fellowship reference on uterine rupture and scar dehiscence — quantified risk for every scar and every induction plan, the fetal heart rate signature, dehiscence versus rupture, resuscitation and laparotomy, the repair-versus-hysterectomy decision, and counselling for the next pregnancy. RANZCOG-primary, globally tagged to MRCOG and ABOG.

high20 referencesUpdated 26 July 202617 min readVerification in progress

Practise this topic

  • 10 MCQs

Your progress

Saved on this device.

Practise this topic10 MCQs with explanations

Target exams

FRANZCOGMRCOGABOGFRCSCMRCPI

Red flags

  • Fetal bradycardia in a labouring woman with a uterine scar — this is a rupture until laparotomy proves otherwise
  • Pain that breaks through a working epidural — a red flag, never a top-up indication
  • Loss of station — the head that was at the spines and is now high
  • Prostaglandin ripening after a previous caesarean multiplies the rupture risk many times over
  • A normal bedside ultrasound never excludes rupture and must never delay the laparotomy
  • Repairing a uterus that should have been removed, in a woman who is already coagulopathic
On this page
Study tools

Your progress

Saved on this device.

Practise this topic10 MCQs with explanations

Target exams

FRANZCOGMRCOGABOGFRCSCMRCPI

Red flags

  • Fetal bradycardia in a labouring woman with a uterine scar — this is a rupture until laparotomy proves otherwise
  • Pain that breaks through a working epidural — a red flag, never a top-up indication
  • Loss of station — the head that was at the spines and is now high
  • Prostaglandin ripening after a previous caesarean multiplies the rupture risk many times over
  • A normal bedside ultrasound never excludes rupture and must never delay the laparotomy
  • Repairing a uterus that should have been removed, in a woman who is already coagulopathic
One-line fellowship answer

Uterine rupture is a full-thickness tear through the myometrium and serosa; dehiscence keeps its serosa and its baby inside. In a labouring woman with a scar, a sudden fetal bradycardia is a rupture until laparotomy proves otherwise — stop the oxytocin, call the team, activate the massive haemorrhage protocol and go to theatre, because time to delivery beyond 30 minutes multiplies perinatal death many times over.[1][4][8]

She is 6 cm, has one previous caesarean, and the syntocinon has been up for two hours. She has been comfortable on the epidural all night and now she says her tummy hurts between the contractions. Two minutes later the heart rate falls to 70 and stays there.[4][15]

Do not top up the epidural. Do not order an ultrasound. Turn off the oxytocin, call the theatre and say the word "rupture" out loud, because in this scenario the diagnosis is made in the abdomen and nowhere else.[1][8]

Overview and definition

  • Complete (true) rupture: full-thickness separation of the uterine wall including the serosa, so the cavity communicates with the peritoneum. Fetal parts, cord or placenta may extrude. This is the emergency.[1][9]
  • Scar dehiscence (incomplete rupture, uterine window): the myometrium separates but the serosa or visceral peritoneum stays intact. Usually no bleeding, no fetal extrusion, and often found incidentally at repeat caesarean.[1][9]

Complete rupture

  • Serosa breached — cavity opens into the peritoneum
  • Haemorrhage, shock, coagulopathy
  • Fetal extrusion or placental separation possible
  • Diagnosed clinically then confirmed at laparotomy

Scar dehiscence

  • Serosa or peritoneum intact — the 'window'
  • Usually no bleeding and no haemodynamic change
  • Fetus stays inside the uterus
  • Usually an incidental finding at elective repeat caesarean
[1] [9] [15]

The distinction is not academic. In the Dutch prospective national study, no adverse outcomes occurred among women with incomplete rupture, while complete rupture with adverse outcome ran at 0.9 per 10 000 births. In the Norwegian prelabour series, all 45 partial ruptures — 39 of them in lower-segment scars — produced no perinatal death and no hysterectomy.[9][15]

The one-sentence discriminatorDehiscence keeps its serosa; rupture does not. If the serosa is intact, the fetus is inside and the woman is not bleeding, you are looking at a window — repair it, document it, and counsel her about next time.[1][9]
Obstetrics & Gynaecology Pro

Continue reading

You have read the opening of this topic. The complete unit — every section and its primary-source references — is part of the Obstetrics & Gynaecology fellowship library.

Sign in to continueSee pricing
References20ShowHide
  1. [1]American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 205: Vaginal Birth After Cesarean Delivery Obstet Gynecol, 2019.PMID 30681543
  2. [2]Landon MB, Hauth JC, Leveno KJ, et al. Maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with a trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery N Engl J Med, 2004.PMID 15598960
  3. [3]Lydon-Rochelle M, Holt VL, Easterling TR, et al. Risk of uterine rupture during labor among women with a prior cesarean delivery N Engl J Med, 2001.PMID 11439945
  4. [4]Ridgeway JJ, Weyrich DL, Benedetti TJ, et al. Fetal heart rate changes associated with uterine rupture Obstet Gynecol, 2004.PMID 14990414
  5. [5]Desseauve D, Bonifazi-Grenouilleau M, Fritel X, et al. Fetal heart rate abnormalities associated with uterine rupture: a case-control study: A new time-lapse approach using a standardized classification Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 2016.PMID 26696557
  6. [6]Al-Zirqi I, Daltveit AK, Forsén L, et al. Risk factors for complete uterine rupture Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2017.PMID 27780708
  7. [7]Al-Zirqi I, Daltveit AK, Vangen S, et al. Maternal outcome after complete uterine rupture Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, 2019.PMID 30762871
  8. [8]Al-Zirqi I, Daltveit AK, Vangen S, et al. Infant outcome after complete uterine rupture Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2018.PMID 29655964
  9. [9]Al-Zirqi I, Vangen S Prelabour uterine rupture: characteristics and outcomes BJOG, 2020.PMID 32534459
  10. [10]Vandenberghe G, Vierin A, Bloemenkamp K, et al. Incidence and outcomes of uterine rupture in women with unscarred, preterm or prelabour uteri: data from the international network of obstetric survey systems BJOG, 2023.PMID 37113103
  11. [11]Bujold E, Mehta SH, Bujold C, et al. Interdelivery interval and uterine rupture Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2002.PMID 12439503
  12. [12]Bujold E, Goyet M, Marcoux S, et al. The role of uterine closure in the risk of uterine rupture Obstet Gynecol, 2010.PMID 20567166
  13. [13]Roberge S, Bujold E Closure of uterus and the risk of uterine rupture BJOG, 2015.PMID 25289605
  14. [14]Sugai S, Sasabuchi Y, Yasunaga H, et al. In-hospital outcomes of repair and hysterectomy for uterine rupture: A nationwide observational study Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 2024.PMID 39298829
  15. [15]Overtoom EM, Huynh TN, Rosman AN, et al. Predicting the risks and recognizing the signs: a two-year prospective population-based study on pregnant women with uterine rupture in The Netherlands J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med, 2024.PMID 38350236
  16. [16]Al-Zirqi I, Vangen S Pregnancies in Women with a Previous Complete Uterine Rupture Obstet Gynecol Int, 2023.PMID 36819713
  17. [17]Adily P, Bettison T, Lauer M, et al. Inter-pregnancy interval and uterine rupture during a trial of labour after one previous caesarean delivery and no previous vaginal births: a retrospective population-based cohort study EClinicalMedicine, 2025.PMID 39902314
  18. [18]Dodd JM, Crowther CA, Huertas E, et al. Planned elective repeat caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for women with a previous caesarean birth Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2013.PMID 24323886
  19. [19]Landon MB, Spong CY, Thom E, et al. Risk of uterine rupture with a trial of labor in women with multiple and single prior cesarean delivery Obstet Gynecol, 2006.PMID 16816050
  20. [20]Sugai S, Sasabuchi Y, Yasunaga H, et al. Clinical characteristics and outcomes of preterm versus term uterine rupture: a nationwide observational study Arch Gynecol Obstet, 2024.PMID 39394460

Test yourself

Practise what you just read

  • 10 MCQs
Obstetrics & Gynaecology Pro

$29/ monthor $279 / year

The complete Obstetrics & Gynaecology library, every exam format, one subscription.

  • Complete library for one chosen specialty
  • Timed MCQ mock exams and spaced review
  • Clinical cases & cross-table vivas
See pricingSign in
PreviousUmbilical cord prolapseIntrapartum care — obstetric emergenciesNextAnaemia in pregnancyAntenatal care — haematological disorders