Skip to main content
MedVellum
QuestionsVideosPricing

MedVellum

Fellowship exam preparation across every specialty: source-verified topics, questions in every format, and videos.

Product

  • Specialties
  • Questions
  • Videos
  • Exam tools
  • Pricing

Verification & policy

  • Verified register
  • Editorial policy
  • Privacy
  • Terms

Account

  • Sign in
  • Create account
  • Dashboard
  • Account & billing

© 2026 MedVellum. For education only — not a substitute for clinical judgement.

llms.txtPsychiatry LLM catalogSitemap

O&G TopicsIntrapartum care — labour and birth

O&G · Intrapartum care — labour and birth

Term prelabour rupture of membranes

Also known as Term PROM · PROM at term · Prelabour rupture of membranes at term · Prelabor rupture of membranes · SROM before labour

Exam-exhaustive FRANZCOG fellowship reference on term prelabour rupture of membranes — sterile speculum diagnosis, the TERMPROM and Cochrane evidence for immediate induction versus expectant management, oxytocin as the induction agent of choice, the group B streptococcus interaction with intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis doses, infection surveillance, and the counselling conversation with its time thresholds. RANZCOG C-Obs 36 anchored, globally tagged to NICE, ACOG and CDC.

high14 referencesUpdated 26 July 202616 min readVerification in progress

Practise this topic

  • 10 MCQs

Your progress

Saved on this device.

Practise this topic10 MCQs with explanations

Target exams

FRANZCOGMRCOGABOGFRCSCMRCPI

Red flags

  • Maternal fever with fetal tachycardia, a raised white cell count or purulent cervical fluid — suspected Triple I; expedite birth and start antibiotics
  • Group B streptococcus positive with ruptured membranes — induce now and give intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis; do not wait
  • Repeated digital vaginal examinations — more than 8 quadrupled the odds of chorioamnionitis in the TERMPROM cohort
  • Meconium-stained liquor at term PROM — an independent predictor of chorioamnionitis and a reason to escalate
  • Sudden fetal bradycardia with a high presenting part — cord prolapse
  • Time of rupture not documented — every subsequent decision is anchored to a number nobody wrote down
On this page
Study tools

Your progress

Saved on this device.

Practise this topic10 MCQs with explanations

Target exams

FRANZCOGMRCOGABOGFRCSCMRCPI

Red flags

  • Maternal fever with fetal tachycardia, a raised white cell count or purulent cervical fluid — suspected Triple I; expedite birth and start antibiotics
  • Group B streptococcus positive with ruptured membranes — induce now and give intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis; do not wait
  • Repeated digital vaginal examinations — more than 8 quadrupled the odds of chorioamnionitis in the TERMPROM cohort
  • Meconium-stained liquor at term PROM — an independent predictor of chorioamnionitis and a reason to escalate
  • Sudden fetal bradycardia with a high presenting part — cord prolapse
  • Time of rupture not documented — every subsequent decision is anchored to a number nobody wrote down
One-line fellowship answer

At term, ruptured membranes without labour is a conversation with a clock in it: confirm on sterile speculum, record the exact time, keep your fingers out until labour or induction begins, check the group B streptococcus status, and offer induction with intravenous oxytocin — because TERMPROM and the Cochrane review show planned early birth roughly halves maternal infectious morbidity and reduces probable early-onset neonatal sepsis without raising the caesarean rate, and women in the trial preferred it.[1][2][5]

It is 06:15 and a well 39-week primigravida walks into the birth suite with wet leggings and no contractions. Nothing about her needs an emergency. Everything about her needs a decision, and the decision has a clock attached to it: from the moment those membranes went, the risk of infection has been climbing while the chance of spontaneous labour has been ticking down.[1][4]

Overview and definition

Term prelabour rupture of membranes is spontaneous rupture of the membranes at or after 37+0 weeks, before labour begins. Two other definitions travel with it and examiners like them separated: [6][4]

  • Prolonged rupture of membranes — commonly defined at 18 or 24 hours, and used as a risk factor in neonatal sepsis assessment rather than as a management trigger in its own right.[9][6]
  • Suspected Triple I — the NICHD replacement for intrapartum "chorioamnionitis": a documented fever without a clear source plus at least one of fetal tachycardia over 160 bpm for 10 minutes or longer, a maternal white cell count over 15 000 per cubic millimetre in the absence of corticosteroids, or definite purulent fluid from the cervical os.[7]

The two management strategies are planned early birth (induction immediately or within about 24 hours) and expectant management (no planned intervention within 24 hours, with surveillance). Everything else in this topic is a variation on choosing between them.[2]

The numbers you quote in the conversation

8.6%Chorioamnionitis, expectant managementTERMPROM, expectant-oxytocin arm
4.0%Chorioamnionitis, oxytocin inductionTERMPROM, P less than 0.001
10.1 hours shorterRupture-to-birth interval, planned early birthCochrane mean difference
13.4 vs 10.4 hoursMean rupture-to-birth, nulliparous vs multiparous11 219 expectantly managed women
[1] [2] [12]
Obstetrics & Gynaecology Pro

Continue reading

You have read the opening of this topic. The complete unit — every section and its primary-source references — is part of the Obstetrics & Gynaecology fellowship library.

Sign in to continueSee pricing
References14ShowHide
  1. [1]Hannah ME, Ohlsson A, Farine D, Hewson SA, Hodnett ED, et al. Induction of labor compared with expectant management for prelabor rupture of the membranes at term N Engl J Med, 1996.PMID 8598837
  2. [2]Middleton P, Shepherd E, Flenady V, McBain RD, Crowther CA Planned early birth versus expectant management (waiting) for prelabour rupture of membranes at term (37 weeks or more) Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2017.PMID 28050900
  3. [3]Hannah ME, Ohlsson A, Wang EE, Matlow A, Foster GA, et al. Maternal colonization with group B Streptococcus and prelabor rupture of membranes at term: the role of induction of labor Am J Obstet Gynecol, 1997.PMID 9369819
  4. [4]Seaward PG, Hannah ME, Myhr TL, Farine D, Ohlsson A, et al. International Multicentre Term Prelabor Rupture of Membranes Study: evaluation of predictors of clinical chorioamnionitis and postpartum fever in patients with prelabor rupture of membranes at term Am J Obstet Gynecol, 1997.PMID 9396886
  5. [5]Hodnett ED, Hannah ME, Weston JA, Ohlsson A, Myhr TL, et al. Women's evaluations of induction of labor versus expectant management for prelabor rupture of the membranes at term Birth, 1997.PMID 9460311
  6. [6]American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Prelabor Rupture of Membranes: ACOG Practice Bulletin, Number 217 Obstet Gynecol, 2020.PMID 32080050
  7. [7]Higgins RD, Saade G, Polin RA, Grobman WA, Buhimschi IA, et al. Evaluation and Management of Women and Newborns With a Maternal Diagnosis of Chorioamnionitis: Summary of a Workshop Obstet Gynecol, 2016.PMID 26855098
  8. [8]American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Prevention of Group B Streptococcal Early-Onset Disease in Newborns: ACOG Committee Opinion, Number 797 Obstet Gynecol, 2020.PMID 31977795
  9. [9]Verani JR, McGee L, Schrag SJ Prevention of perinatal group B streptococcal disease--revised guidelines from CDC, 2010 MMWR Recomm Rep, 2010.PMID 21088663
  10. [10]Chen JC, Jenkins-Marsh S, Flenady V, Ireland S, May M, et al. Early-onset group B streptococcal disease in a risk factor-based prevention setting: A 15-year population-based study Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol, 2019.PMID 30203834
  11. [11]Hasperhoven GF, Al-Nasiry S, Bekker V, Villamor E, Kramer B Universal screening versus risk-based protocols for antibiotic prophylaxis during childbirth to prevent early-onset group B streptococcal disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis BJOG, 2020.PMID 31913562
  12. [12]Ram S, Lavie M, Bitan R, Sabag DN, Madar D, et al. Time from pre-labor rupture of membrane at term to delivery in grand multiparous women Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 2026.PMID 41822972
  13. [13]Morris JM, Roberts CL, Bowen JR, Patterson JA, Bond DM, et al. Immediate delivery compared with expectant management after preterm pre-labour rupture of the membranes close to term (PPROMT trial): a randomised controlled trial Lancet, 2016.PMID 26564381
  14. [14]Thomson AJ Care of Women Presenting with Suspected Preterm Prelabour Rupture of Membranes from 24(+0) Weeks of Gestation: Green-top Guideline No. 73 BJOG, 2019.PMID 31207667

Test yourself

Practise what you just read

  • 10 MCQs
Obstetrics & Gynaecology Pro

$29/ monthor $279 / year

The complete Obstetrics & Gynaecology library, every exam format, one subscription.

  • Complete library for one chosen specialty
  • Timed MCQ mock exams and spaced review
  • Clinical cases & cross-table vivas
See pricingSign in
PreviousSystemic therapy for gynaecological cancer — what the generalist must knowGynae-oncology — systemic therapyNextThe normal menstrual cycle & HPO axisGynaecological health — menstrual physiology