Skip to main content
MedVellum
QuestionsVideosPricing

MedVellum

Fellowship exam preparation across every specialty: source-verified topics, questions in every format, and videos.

Product

  • Specialties
  • Questions
  • Videos
  • Exam tools
  • Pricing

Verification & policy

  • Verified register
  • Editorial policy
  • Privacy
  • Terms

Account

  • Sign in
  • Create account
  • Dashboard
  • Account & billing

© 2026 MedVellum. For education only — not a substitute for clinical judgement.

llms.txtPsychiatry LLM catalogSitemap

O&G TopicsIntrapartum care — place of birth and care model

O&G · Intrapartum care — place of birth and care model

Models of intrapartum care

Also known as Place of birth · Birth setting · Home birth · Midwifery-led care · Water immersion · Waterbirth · Continuity of carer

Exam-exhaustive FRANZCOG reference on models of intrapartum care — the four planned birth settings and the Birthplace in England numbers by parity, the counselling conversation, water immersion and waterbirth with the exclusion criteria and evacuation drill, midwifery continuity of carer and its evidence, the transfer pathway, and the Dutch home-birth cohort that frames the debate. RANZCOG-primary, globally tagged.

high9 referencesUpdated 26 July 202614 min readVerification in progress

Practise this topic

  • 9 MCQs

Your progress

Saved on this device.

Practise this topic9 MCQs with explanations

Target exams

FRANZCOGMRCOGABOGFRCSCMRCPI

Red flags

  • Counselling from actual place of birth rather than planned place of birth — it quotes the wrong denominator
  • Quoting the pooled home-birth result to a nulliparous woman when the risk is concentrated there
  • Offering water immersion without an evacuation drill rehearsed — the emergency you have not practised is the one that happens
  • Pulling a baby from the water at a waterbirth, or submerging again — cord snapping and asphyxia are avoidable
  • Receiving a transferred woman with judgement rather than a handover
  • Treating continuity of carer as a staffing luxury rather than an intervention with outcome data
On this page
Study tools

Your progress

Saved on this device.

Practise this topic9 MCQs with explanations

Target exams

FRANZCOGMRCOGABOGFRCSCMRCPI

Red flags

  • Counselling from actual place of birth rather than planned place of birth — it quotes the wrong denominator
  • Quoting the pooled home-birth result to a nulliparous woman when the risk is concentrated there
  • Offering water immersion without an evacuation drill rehearsed — the emergency you have not practised is the one that happens
  • Pulling a baby from the water at a waterbirth, or submerging again — cord snapping and asphyxia are avoidable
  • Receiving a transferred woman with judgement rather than a handover
  • Treating continuity of carer as a staffing luxury rather than an intervention with outcome data
One-line fellowship answer

A healthy woman at low risk may plan birth at home, in a freestanding or alongside midwifery unit, or in an obstetric unit — and for multiparous women the planned place outside an obstetric unit is as safe for the baby with fewer interventions, while for nulliparous women a planned home birth carries a small but real increase in adverse perinatal outcome. Counsel on planned place of birth (never actual), give her the numbers for her parity, respect her informed choice, keep water immersion within its exclusion criteria with a rehearsed evacuation drill, and offer midwifery continuity of carer because it reduces intervention and preterm birth.[1][7][3]

She is 36 weeks, well, and this is her first baby. She hands you a birth plan that says "home birth, water pool, no obstetric review." The temptation is to say yes or no. The consultants who handle this well do neither first — they give her the numbers for a nulliparous woman, and they let the numbers change the conversation. This whole topic turns on whether you counsel on planned place of birth with her parity in mind, or whether you quote the pooled average and miss the risk that is concentrated exactly where she sits.[1]

Overview and definition

Four planned birth settings are the frame, and the words matter because they decide what is and is not available in the room.[1][7]

  • Obstetric unit (OU) — midwives, obstetricians, anaesthetists, theatre, blood, neonatal team, continuous monitoring: the full capability on site.
  • Alongside midwifery unit (AMU) — midwifery-led, on the same site as an OU, so transfer is a corridor rather than an ambulance.
  • Freestanding midwifery unit (FMU) — midwifery-led, geographically separate; transfer is by ambulance.[4]
  • Home — midwifery-led, in the woman's home; transfer is by ambulance.

Midwifery continuity of carer means the same midwife (or small team) provides care through pregnancy, birth and the postnatal period — distinct from caseload midwifery (a named midwife with backups), team midwifery (a shared team), and standard fragmented care.[3]

Water immersion in labour (first stage in the pool) and waterbirth (birth in the pool) are different questions with different evidence — keep them separate in the counselling.[2]

Obstetrics & Gynaecology Pro

Continue reading

You have read the opening of this topic. The complete unit — every section and its primary-source references — is part of the Obstetrics & Gynaecology fellowship library.

Sign in to continueSee pricing
References9ShowHide
  1. [1]Brocklehurst P, Hardy P, Hollowell J, et al. Perinatal and maternal outcomes by planned place of birth for healthy women with low risk pregnancies: the Birthplace in England national prospective cohort study. BMJ, 2011.PMID 22117057
  2. [2]Cluett ER, Burns E, Cuthbert A Immersion in water during labour and birth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2018.PMID 29768662
  3. [3]Sandall J, Soltani H, Gates S, Shennan A, Devane D Midwife-led continuity models versus other models of care for childbearing women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2016.PMID 27121907
  4. [4]Overgaard C, Møller AM, Fenger-Grøn M, Knudsen LB, Sandall J Freestanding midwifery unit versus obstetric unit: a matched cohort study of outcomes in low-risk women. BMJ Open, 2011.PMID 22021892
  5. [5]Wax JR, Lucas FL, Lamont M, Pinette MG, Cartin A, Blackstone J Maternal and newborn outcomes in planned home birth vs planned hospital births: a metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2010.PMID 20598284
  6. [6]Bovbjerg ML, Cheyney M, Caughey AB Maternal and neonatal outcomes following waterbirth: a cohort study of 17 530 waterbirths and 17 530 propensity-matched landbirths. BJOG, 2022.PMID 34773367
  7. [7]American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Committee Opinion No. 697: Planned Home Birth. Obstet Gynecol, 2017.PMID 28333824
  8. [8]de Jonge A, Geerts CC, van der Goes BY, Mol BW, Buitendijk SE, Nijhuis JG Perinatal mortality and morbidity up to 28 days after birth among 743 070 low-risk planned home and hospital births: a cohort study based on three merged population-based datasets in the Netherlands. BJOG, 2015.PMID 25204886
  9. [9]Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists Water immersion during labour and birth (C-Obs 24) RANZCOG, 2021.Source

Test yourself

Practise what you just read

  • 9 MCQs
Obstetrics & Gynaecology Pro

$29/ monthor $279 / year

The complete Obstetrics & Gynaecology library, every exam format, one subscription.

  • Complete library for one chosen specialty
  • Timed MCQ mock exams and spaced review
  • Clinical cases & cross-table vivas
See pricingSign in
PreviousMiscarriage: diagnosis and managementEarly pregnancy care — pregnancy lossNextMonochorionic twin pregnancyAntenatal care — multiple pregnancy