Skip to main content
MedVellum
QuestionsVideosPricing

MedVellum

Fellowship exam preparation across every specialty: source-verified topics, questions in every format, and videos.

Product

  • Specialties
  • Questions
  • Videos
  • Exam tools
  • Pricing

Verification & policy

  • Verified register
  • Editorial policy
  • Privacy
  • Terms

Account

  • Sign in
  • Create account
  • Dashboard
  • Account & billing

© 2026 MedVellum. For education only — not a substitute for clinical judgement.

llms.txtPsychiatry LLM catalogSitemap

O&G TopicsGynaecological surgery — permanent contraception and fertility restoration

O&G · Gynaecological surgery — permanent contraception and fertility restoration

Tubal sterilisation and reversal: methods, regret, IVF and re-anastomosis

Also known as Female sterilisation · Tubal ligation · Filshie clip · Pomeroy sterilisation · Partial salpingectomy · Essure · Tubal reversal · Tubal re-anastomosis · Sterilisation regret

Exam-exhaustive FRANZCOG fellowship topic on tubal sterilisation and reversal: Filshie clips, Pomeroy and partial salpingectomy, coagulation, the Essure hysteroscopic device and its withdrawal, consent and age-related regret, cumulative failure rates, tubal re-anastomosis, IVF comparison and method- and age-dependent success. ANZ primary with RANZCOG, RCOG and ACOG consent principles, globally tagged.

high16 referencesUpdated 29 July 202610 min readVerification in progress

Practise this topic

  • 8 MCQs

Your progress

Saved on this device.

Practise this topic8 MCQs with explanations

Target exams

FRANZCOGMRCOGABOGFRCSCMRCPI

Red flags

  • Sterilisation is intended to be permanent — if the patient is uncertain, offer LARC and defer
  • Consent during labour, immediately after birth, or soon after pregnancy loss — check voluntariness and capacity; do not rely on a signature alone
  • Pregnancy after sterilisation — diagnose location early because ectopic pregnancy remains a concern
  • Essure without the three-month confirmatory test — occlusion is not established
  • Reversal without a semen analysis, ovarian-reserve assessment, or original operative report — success cannot be counselled honestly
  • Tubal re-anastomosis in a woman over 40 with poor reserve — IVF usually gives the more efficient path
On this page

Related topics

  • Pelvic-factor infertility: tubal patency (HyCoSy, HSG, laparoscopy), endometriosis, adhesions, and submucous fibroids
  • IVF and ART techniques: stimulation, trigger, transfer, luteal support, OHSS prevention and cumulative success
Study tools

Your progress

Saved on this device.

Practise this topic8 MCQs with explanations

Target exams

FRANZCOGMRCOGABOGFRCSCMRCPI

Red flags

  • Sterilisation is intended to be permanent — if the patient is uncertain, offer LARC and defer
  • Consent during labour, immediately after birth, or soon after pregnancy loss — check voluntariness and capacity; do not rely on a signature alone
  • Pregnancy after sterilisation — diagnose location early because ectopic pregnancy remains a concern
  • Essure without the three-month confirmatory test — occlusion is not established
  • Reversal without a semen analysis, ovarian-reserve assessment, or original operative report — success cannot be counselled honestly
  • Tubal re-anastomosis in a woman over 40 with poor reserve — IVF usually gives the more efficient path
One-line fellowship answer

Tubal sterilisation is intended to be permanent. Offer a method matched to the setting (Filshie clip at interval laparoscopy, Pomeroy/partial salpingectomy postpartum or at caesarean, and never Essure in current Australian practice), obtain a voluntary and future-proof consent with the age-related regret conversation, and counsel that failure — although uncommon — can occur. If she later wants pregnancy, obtain the original operative report, assess semen analysis and ovarian reserve, and compare microsurgical tubal re-anastomosis (best when young with adequate residual tube) against IVF (more efficient with advancing age, tubal loss or male factor). [1][4][10][11]

At the counselling visit, the patient asks, "Can I change my mind?" The answer is not "no"; it is "this operation is designed to be permanent, and I want to make sure your decision is voluntary, informed and not driven by the pregnancy or relationship you are living through today." She needs the failure rate, the regret risk, the alternatives, and the practical limits of reversal. The surgeon needs the same conversation in the consent form. [4][6]

Definition and classification

Tubal sterilisation interrupts fallopian-tube patency to prevent sperm and ovum meeting. Classify the method by tissue damage and setting because this predicts both failure and future reversibility. [1]

[1]

Interval laparoscopic

  • Filshie (titanium-silicone) clip — small segment compressed, relatively tissue-sparing
  • Bipolar coagulation — destroys a segment; failure depends on number and spacing of burns
  • Laparoscopic route requires anaesthesia and carries trocar and visceral-injury risk

Postpartum or caesarean

  • Pomeroy or modified Pomeroy — loop of tube ligated and a segment excised
  • Partial salpingectomy — the excised segment is sent to pathology where locally required
  • Mini-laparotomy or operation through the caesarean incision

Hysteroscopic

  • Essure micro-inserts placed at the tubal ostia, relying on fibrosis
  • Required a three-month HSG or equivalent confirmation before relying on contraception
  • Withdrawn from Australia and the global market; not an option for new patients
[1] [2] [7]
Obstetrics & Gynaecology Pro

Continue reading

You have read the opening of this topic. The complete unit — every section and its primary-source references — is part of the Obstetrics & Gynaecology fellowship library.

Sign in to continueSee pricing
References16ShowHide
  1. [1]Lawrie TA, Kulier R, Nardin JM Techniques for the interruption of tubal patency for female sterilisation Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2016.PMID 27494193
  2. [2]Jokinen E, Heino A, Karipohja T, Gissler M, Hurskainen R Safety and effectiveness of female tubal sterilisation by hysteroscopy, laparoscopy, or laparotomy: a register based study BJOG, 2017.PMID 28464415
  3. [3]Walhof KA, Gawron LM, Turok DK, Sanders JN Long-Term Failure Rates of Interval Filshie Clips As a Method of Permanent Contraception Womens Health Rep (New Rochelle), 2021.PMID 34327509
  4. [4]Hillis SD, Marchbanks PA, Tylor LR, Peterson HB Poststerilization regret: findings from the United States Collaborative Review of Sterilization Obstet Gynecol, 1999.PMID 10362150
  5. [5]Schmidt JE, Hillis SD, Marchbanks PA, Jeng G, Peterson HB Requesting information about and obtaining reversal after tubal sterilization: findings from the U.S. Collaborative Review of Sterilization Fertil Steril, 2000.PMID 11056229
  6. [6]Grubb GS, Peterson HB, Layde PM, Rubin GL Regret after decision to have a tubal sterilization Fertil Steril, 1985.PMID 4018280
  7. [7]Mao J, Pfeifer S, Schlegel P, Sedrakyan A Safety and efficacy of hysteroscopic sterilization compared with laparoscopic sterilization: an observational cohort study BMJ, 2015.PMID 26462857
  8. [8]Zou C, Davis B, Wigle PR, Hincapie AL, Guo JJ Safety reporting of Essure medical device: a qualitative and quantitative assessment on the FDA manufacturer and user facility device experience database in 2018 Front Reprod Health, 2023.PMID 37519343
  9. [9]Chene G, Cerruto E, Moret S, Lebail-Carval K, Chabert P, Mellier G, Nohuz E, Lamblin G, Clark TJ Quality of life after laparoscopic removal of Essure(®) sterilization devices Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X, 2019.PMID 31404292
  10. [10]Sastre J, Mínguez JÁ, Alcázar JL, Chiva L Microsurgical anastomosis of the fallopian tubes after tubal ligation: a systematic review and meta-analysis Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 2023.PMID 38353086
  11. [11]Messinger LB, Alford CE, Csokmay JM, Henne MB, Mumford SL, Segars JH, Armstrong AY Cost and efficacy comparison of in vitro fertilization and tubal anastomosis for women after tubal ligation Fertil Steril, 2015.PMID 26006734
  12. [12]Garg N, Milad MP Female sterilization reversal in the era of in-vitro fertilization Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol, 2022.PMID 35895967
  13. [13]Chua KH, Chan JKY, Liu S, Tan TY, Phoon JWL, Viardot-Foucault VC, Nadarajah S, Tan HH Laparoscopic Tubal Re-anastomosis or In Vitro Fertilisation in Previously Ligated Patients: A Comparison of Fertility Outcomes and Survey of Patient Attitudes Ann Acad Med Singap, 2020.PMID 32296806
  14. [14]Nolan W, Ohaeri H, Georger L, Ghomi A Robotic-assisted laparoscopic Essure removal: a novel surgical approach J Robot Surg, 2021.PMID 33237557
  15. [15]Tan HH, Loh SF Microsurgical reversal of sterilisation - is this still clinically relevant today? Ann Acad Med Singap, 2010.PMID 20126810
  16. [16]American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists' Committee on Practice Bulletins—Gynecology ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 208: Benefits and Risks of Sterilization Obstet Gynecol, 2019.PMID 30640233

Test yourself

Practise what you just read

  • 8 MCQs
Obstetrics & Gynaecology Pro

$29/ monthor $279 / year

The complete Obstetrics & Gynaecology library, every exam format, one subscription.

  • Complete library for one chosen specialty
  • Timed MCQ mock exams and spaced review
  • Clinical cases & cross-table vivas
See pricingSign in
PreviousThyroid disease in pregnancyAntenatal care — endocrine disordersNextTurner syndrome and differences of sex development (DSD) at generalist depthGynaecological health — paediatric, adolescent and congenital

Related topics

  • Pelvic-factor infertility: tubal patency (HyCoSy, HSG, laparoscopy), endometriosis, adhesions, and submucous fibroids
  • IVF and ART techniques: stimulation, trigger, transfer, luteal support, OHSS prevention and cumulative success