O&G · gynae-surgery
Hysterectomy
Also known as Total abdominal hysterectomy · TAH · Total laparoscopic hysterectomy · TLH · Vaginal hysterectomy · VH · Robotic hysterectomy · Radical hysterectomy · Querleu–Morrow · Hysterectomy routes · Subtotal hysterectomy
Exam-exhaustive FRANZCOG fellowship reference on hysterectomy — the four routes (abdominal, vaginal, laparoscopic, robotic), the abdominal incisions (midline vs Pfannenstiel), the steps of total laparoscopic hysterectomy (ureter identification, uterosacral transection, colpotomy, cuff closure), the complications (bleeding, ureteric and bladder injury, vaginal cuff dehiscence, vault haematoma), the evidence base (Cochrane Pickett 2023 route comparison), and the contemporary AAGL/RANZCOG/RCOG/ACOG positions. RANZCOG-primary, globally tagged to MRCOG, ABOG and FRCSC.
Practise this topic
On this page
Study tools
Your progress
Saved on this device.
Target exams
Red flags
- Vaginal hysterectomy is preferred to abdominal when feasible — Cochrane Pickett 2023 (PMID 37642285) — underused in many settings
- Laparoscopic hysterectomy carries a higher urinary tract injury rate than abdominal (OR 2.16) — the ureter is the most commonly injured structure
- The lateral cervical branch of the uterine artery crosses over the ureter — the named source of bleeding at hysterectomy
- Vaginal cuff dehiscence is more common after laparoscopic than open hysterectomy — present with bowel evisceration, resuscitate and return to theatre
- Asymptomatic postoperative ureteric injury presents with rising creatinine on day 2 — absence of symptoms does not equal absence of injury
- Subtotal (supracervical) hysterectomy does not eliminate the need for cervical screening — the cervix remains
It is 08:30 on a Tuesday theatre list. The next patient is a 44-year-old para 2 with heavy menstrual bleeding refractory to the hormonal IUD and tranexamic acid, a 10-week bulky uterus, and a normal cervical screening test. She has had one previous Caesarean section. You and the consultant have to agree the route before she goes to sleep. This topic is that conversation — and the operation that follows.[1]
Overview and definition
Hysterectomy is the surgical removal of the uterus. It is the most common major gynaecological operation in high-income settings, with a lifetime risk around 20–25% in the United States and around 17–20% in the United Kingdom, and the Australian pattern mirrors the UK. Hysterectomy can be performed for benign gynaecological disease (heavy menstrual bleeding, fibroids, endometriosis, adenomyosis, pelvic organ prolapse), for gynaecological malignancy (cervical, endometrial, ovarian), or as an emergency obstetric procedure (placenta accreta spectrum, uncontrollable postpartum haemorrhage).[1]
The contemporary language uses four named routes — abdominal, vaginal, laparoscopic, and robotic-assisted — and a recent addition, V-NOTES (vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery). Each is further subdivided by extent and technique.[1][7]
Abdominal (AH)
- Incision: midline or Pfannenstiel
- Best for large uterus, malignancy, frozen pelvis, multiple prior surgeries
- Longest recovery (6–8 weeks)
- Highest wound complication rate
Vaginal (VH)
- Incision: circumferential around cervix
- Best for prolapse indication, multiparity, mobile uterus under 12-week size
- Shortest recovery (2–4 weeks)
- Preferred over abdominal when feasible (Cochrane 2023)
Laparoscopic (LH)
- Incision: 3–4 ports, uterus removed vaginally or by morcellation
- Best for most benign indications in trained hands
- Recovery 2–4 weeks
- Higher urinary tract injury than abdominal (OR 2.16, Cochrane 2023)
Robotic (RH)
- Incision: 4–5 robotic port incisions
- Alternative to laparoscopic in selected cases
- Similar in-hospital recovery to laparoscopic
- No proven advantage over conventional laparoscopic in benign disease
Hysterectomy at a glance
References14ShowHide
- [1]Pickett CM, Seeratan DD, Mol BWJ, Nieboer TE, Johnson N, Bonestroo T, Aarts JW Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2023.PMID 37642285
- [2]AAGL Practice Committee AAGL practice report: Morcellation during uterine tissue extraction J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 2014.PMID 24865630
- [3]Brown J AAGL advancing minimally invasive gynecology worldwide: statement to the FDA on power morcellation J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 2014.PMID 25195157
- [4]AAGL Practice Committee AAGL practice report: Practice Guidelines on the Prevention of Apical Prolapse at the Time of Hysterectomy J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 2014.PMID 24769448
- [5]Lirk P, Thiry J, Bonnet MP, Joshi GP, Bonnet F Pain management after laparoscopic hysterectomy: systematic review of literature and PROSPECT recommendations Anaesthesia, 2019.PMID 30914471
- [6]Ekanayake C, Pathmeswaran A, Kularatna S, Herath R, Wijesinghe P Cost evaluation, quality of life and pelvic organ function of three approaches to hysterectomy for benign disease Cost-effectiveness study, 2017.PMID 29178955
- [7]Chrysostomou A, Djokovic D, Edridge W, van Herendael BJ Evidence-based guidelines for vaginal hysterectomy of the International Society for Gynecologic Endoscopy (ISGE) Gynecol Surg, 2018.PMID 30447552
- [8]Mahmoud MS Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Trachelectomy: A Standard Technique J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 2017.PMID 28254504
- [9]Kobayashi H, et al. Ureter Injury in Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy Case Rep Obstet Gynecol, 2023.PMID 37638335
- [10]Cassani C, Spinillo A, Dominoni M, Gardella B Revisiting Urological Injury Risks in Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy for Benign Indications Urological injury review, 2026.PMID 41882424
- [11]Sakuragi N, Kaneuchi M Nerve-Sparing Radical Hysterectomy Using the Okabayashi-Kobayashi Method Surg J (N Y), 2021.PMID 35111930
- [12]Baradwan S, Khadawardi K, Himayda S, Ebeid SM, Badghish E Use of Uterine Manipulators in Total Abdominal Hysterectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Manipulator systematic review, 2026.PMID 41478334
- [13]Ayhan A, Dursun P, Gultekin M, Yuce K Comparison of midline and Pfannenstiel incision for radical hysterectomy with pelvic and paraaortic lymphadenectomy in cervical carcinoma Surgical comparison, 2007.PMID 17441889
- [14]Ayhan A, Dursun P, Gultekin M, Esin S Pfannenstiel vs. midline incision for early stage endometrial carcinoma Surgical comparison, 2006.PMID 16524579