O&G · Gynaecological oncology — uterine corpus
Endometrial cancer — FIGO 2023 staging with molecular classification and the ESGO 2025 management ladder
Also known as Endometrial carcinoma · Uterine cancer · FIGO 2023 endometrial staging · POLEmut · MMRd endometrial cancer · p53abn endometrial cancer · ProMisE classifier · PORTEC trials
FRANZCOG-exhaustive treatment of endometrial cancer building on the MBBS foundation: the FIGO 2023 (Berek) staging system reproduced verbatim including its four molecular subgroups (POLEmut, MMRd, NSMP, p53abn) and their stage modifiers, the 2025 ESGO-ESTRO-ESP risk-stratified management ladder, the full surgical and adjuvant ladder with trial evidence (PORTEC-1/2/3, FIRES, Fader 2018), fertility-sparing management, and survival by stage and molecular subgroup. ANZ-primary, globally tagged to MRCOG, ABOG, FRCSC and MRCPI.
Practise this topic
On this page
Study tools
Your progress
Saved on this device.
Target exams
Red flags
- Any postmenopausal bleeding is endometrial cancer until proven otherwise — transvaginal ultrasound and endometrial biopsy, no watch-and-wait
- Atypical endometrial hyperplasia carries a 25 to 40 per cent risk of coexistent carcinoma at hysterectomy — definitive management, not observation
- Uterine serous carcinoma is aggressive even when apparently early stage — stage-adjusted chemotherapy and omentectomy, never treat as low-grade endometrioid
- POLEmut tumours have an excellent prognosis and may avoid adjuvant therapy — p53abn tumours are the worst and benefit most from chemoradiotherapy
- Any vaginal bleeding on tamoxifen mandates TVUS and biopsy — tamoxifen roughly doubles endometrial cancer risk
- Endometrial cancer is frequently the sentinel cancer in Lynch syndrome — universal MMR immunohistochemistry on every endometrial cancer
A 62-year-old woman with obesity and type 2 diabetes sits in your clinic after a single episode of postmenopausal bleeding. Her endometrial thickness on transvaginal ultrasound is 9 mm; the pipelle returns grade 1 endometrioid carcinoma. The questions a fellowship candidate must answer are sharp and few: what stage, what molecular class, what surgery, what adjuvant therapy, and what survival can she be offered. The 2023 FIGO revision and the 2025 ESGO update have moved the centre of gravity of this answer toward molecular classification — every candidate must know them.[1][2]
Overview — why this page exists beside the MBBS page
The MBBS endometrial cancer page covers the foundation: the Bokhman dualistic model, the hyperplasia-to-carcinoma sequence, the diagnostic pathway (TVUS, pipelle, hysteroscopy), the FIGO 2009 staging, and the broad management principles. This FRANZCOG page builds on that foundation and goes deeper on the four things a fellowship answer is graded on: the FIGO 2023 staging reproduced verbatim with its molecular classification, the 2025 ESGO-ESTRO-ESP risk-stratified management ladder, the surgical and adjuvant decision tree with trial evidence, and survival by stage and molecular subgroup. Read the MBBS page for the groundwork; this page for the exam.[1][2][13]
Endometrial cancer — the numbers a candidate must know
References14ShowHide
- [1]Berek JS, Matias-Guiu X, Creutzberg C, et al. FIGO staging of endometrial cancer: 2023. Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 2023.PMID 37337978
- [2]Concin N, Matias-Guiu X, Cibula D, et al. ESGO-ESTRO-ESP guidelines for the management of patients with endometrial carcinoma: update 2025. Lancet Oncol, 2025.PMID 40744042
- [3]Concin N, Matias-Guiu X, Vergote I, et al. ESGO/ESTRO/ESP guidelines for the management of patients with endometrial carcinoma. Int J Gynecol Cancer, 2021.PMID 33397713
- [4]Kandoth C, Schultz N, Cherniack AD, et al. Integrated genomic characterization of endometrial carcinoma. Nature, 2013.PMID 23636398
- [5]León-Castillo A, de Boer SM, Powell ME, et al. Molecular Classification of the PORTEC-3 Trial for High-Risk Endometrial Cancer: Impact on Prognosis and Benefit From Adjuvant Therapy. J Clin Oncol, 2020.PMID 32749941
- [6]de Boer SM, Powell ME, Mileshkin L, et al. Adjuvant chemoradiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone for women with high-risk endometrial cancer (PORTEC-3): final results of an international, open-label, multicentre, randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol, 2018.PMID 29449189
- [7]Nout RA, Smit VT, Putter H, et al. Vaginal brachytherapy versus pelvic external beam radiotherapy for patients with endometrial cancer of high-intermediate risk (PORTEC-2): an open-label, non-inferiority, randomised trial. Lancet, 2010.PMID 20206777
- [8]Creutzberg CL, van Putten WL, Koper PC, et al. Surgery and postoperative radiotherapy versus surgery alone for patients with stage-1 endometrial carcinoma: multicentre randomised trial. PORTEC Study Group. Post Operative Radiation Therapy in Endometrial Carcinoma. Lancet, 2000.PMID 10791524
- [9]Keys HM, Roberts JA, Brunetto VL, et al. A phase III trial of surgery with or without adjunctive external pelvic radiation therapy in intermediate risk endometrial adenocarcinoma: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Gynecol Oncol, 2004.PMID 14984936
- [10]Rossi EC, Kowalski LD, Scalici J, et al. A comparison of sentinel lymph node biopsy to lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer staging (FIRES trial): a multicentre, prospective, cohort study. Lancet Oncol, 2017.PMID 28159465
- [11]Fader AN, Roque DM, Siegel E, et al. Randomized Phase II Trial of Carboplatin-Paclitaxel Versus Carboplatin-Paclitaxel-Trastuzumab in Uterine Serous Carcinomas That Overexpress Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2/neu. J Clin Oncol, 2018.PMID 29584549
- [12]Ramirez PT, Frumovitz M, Bodurka DC, et al. Hormonal therapy for the management of grade 1 endometrial adenocarcinoma: a literature review. Gynecol Oncol, 2004.PMID 15385122
- [13]Braun MM, Overbeek-Wager EA, Grumbo RJ Diagnosis and Management of Endometrial Cancer. Am Fam Physician, 2016.PMID 26977831
- [14]Post CCB, de Boer SM, Powell ME, et al. Adjuvant chemoradiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone in women with high-risk endometrial cancer (PORTEC-3): 10-year clinical outcomes. Lancet Oncol, 2025.PMID 40921169