O&G · Antenatal care — screening and prenatal diagnosis
Prenatal screening for chromosomal conditions
Also known as Down syndrome screening · Aneuploidy screening · First-trimester combined screening · NIPT · Cell-free DNA screening · Non-invasive prenatal testing
Exam-exhaustive FRANZCOG fellowship reference on prenatal screening for chromosomal conditions — first-trimester combined screening and its performance, NIPT/cfDNA with detection and false-positive rates read from the Gil meta-analysis, the Malone FASTER trial, the difference between screening and diagnostic testing, the counselling of a screen-positive woman and the no-call result, with regional guideline anchors (ACOG PB 226, ISUOG, FMF). ANZ-primary, globally tagged.
Practise this topic
On this page
Study tools
Your progress
Saved on this device.
Target exams
Red flags
- A cfDNA result is never diagnostic — a screen-positive must be confirmed by CVS or amniocentesis before any irrevocable decision
- A no-call cfDNA result (low fetal fraction) is not a negative result — it carries a higher background aneuploidy risk
- A normal cfDNA result is not a normal fetus — it does not replace the anomaly scan and detects none of the single-gene disorders
- Confined placental mosaicism means a cfDNA positive can sit beside a chromosomally normal fetus — never terminate on cfDNA alone
- An isolated soft marker on the anomaly scan in a woman with a low-risk combined screen rarely changes management — do not reflexively escalate
A 36-year-old woman has just had her first-trimester combined screen and the phone call tells her she is "high risk". She is frightened, and the registrar's first sentence matters more than any number on the page. Screening for chromosomal conditions is one of the highest-yield topics in the fellowship exam because it tests three things at once: the performance of the tests, the biology behind them, and the counselling skill that turns a risk estimate into a decision. This topic holds all three. [3]
Overview and definition
Prenatal screening for chromosomal conditions is the estimation, before birth, of the probability that a fetus has a chromosomal abnormality — most commonly trisomy 21 (Down syndrome), and the rarer trisomies 18 and 13. It is offered to all pregnant women in the first trimester. [3]
The single idea that governs everything that follows: screening estimates a risk; it does not make a diagnosis. A woman with a screen-positive result usually has an unaffected fetus. The only way to know is a diagnostic test — chorionic villus sampling (CVS) or amniocentesis — which samples fetal cells and gives a karyotype or microarray. [3][4]
References12ShowHide
- [1]Gil MM, Accurti V, Santacruz B, et al. Analysis of cell-free DNA in maternal blood in screening for aneuploidies: updated meta-analysis Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2017.PMID 28397325
- [2]Malone FD, Canick JA, Ball RH, et al. First-trimester or second-trimester screening, or both, for Down's syndrome N Engl J Med, 2005.PMID 16282175
- [3]American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Screening for Fetal Chromosomal Abnormalities: ACOG Practice Bulletin, Number 226 Obstet Gynecol, 2020.PMID 32804883
- [4]American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Committee on Practice Bulletins Committee Opinion No. 640: Cell-Free DNA Screening for Fetal Aneuploidy Obstet Gynecol, 2015.PMID 26287791
- [5]Dungan JS, Klugman S, Darilek S, et al. Noninvasive prenatal screening (NIPS) for fetal chromosome abnormalities in a general-risk population: An evidence-based clinical guideline of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) Genet Med, 2023.PMID 36524989
- [6]Beta J, Zhang W, Geris S, et al. Procedure-related risk of miscarriage following chorionic villus sampling and amniocentesis Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2019.PMID 30977213
- [7]Santoli CMA, Anastasio MK, Sparks TN, et al. Unusual Maternal and Fetal Findings With Cell-Free DNA Screening Obstet Gynecol, 2024.PMID 39288158
- [8]Scheffer PG, Wirjosoekarto SAM, Becking EC, et al. Association between low fetal fraction in cell-free DNA testing and adverse pregnancy outcome: A systematic review Prenat Diagn, 2021.PMID 34350596
- [9]Kagan KO, Etchegaray A, Zhou Y, et al. Prospective validation of first-trimester combined screening for trisomy 21 Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2009.PMID 19526452
- [10]Gil MM, Galeva S, Jani J, et al. Cell-free DNA testing of maternal blood in screening for trisomies in twin pregnancy: updated cohort study Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2021.PMID 33838069
- [11]Gil MM, Accurti V, Santacruz B, et al. Analysis of cell-free DNA in maternal blood in screening for aneuploidies: updated meta-analysis Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2017.PMID 28397325
- [12]Malone FD, Canick JA, Ball RH, et al. First-trimester or second-trimester screening, or both, for Down's syndrome N Engl J Med, 2005.PMID 16282175