Skip to main content
MedVellum
QuestionsVideosPricing

MedVellum

Fellowship exam preparation across every specialty: source-verified topics, questions in every format, and videos.

Product

  • Specialties
  • Questions
  • Videos
  • Exam tools
  • Pricing

Verification & policy

  • Verified register
  • Editorial policy
  • Privacy
  • Terms

Account

  • Sign in
  • Create account
  • Dashboard
  • Account & billing

© 2026 MedVellum. For education only — not a substitute for clinical judgement.

llms.txtPsychiatry LLM catalogSitemap

O&G TopicsAntenatal care — screening and prenatal diagnosis

O&G · Antenatal care — screening and prenatal diagnosis

Prenatal screening for chromosomal conditions

Also known as Down syndrome screening · Aneuploidy screening · First-trimester combined screening · NIPT · Cell-free DNA screening · Non-invasive prenatal testing

Exam-exhaustive FRANZCOG fellowship reference on prenatal screening for chromosomal conditions — first-trimester combined screening and its performance, NIPT/cfDNA with detection and false-positive rates read from the Gil meta-analysis, the Malone FASTER trial, the difference between screening and diagnostic testing, the counselling of a screen-positive woman and the no-call result, with regional guideline anchors (ACOG PB 226, ISUOG, FMF). ANZ-primary, globally tagged.

high12 referencesUpdated 26 July 202612 min readVerification in progress

Practise this topic

  • 8 MCQs

Your progress

Saved on this device.

Practise this topic8 MCQs with explanations

Target exams

FRANZCOGMRCOGABOGFRCSCMRCPI

Red flags

  • A cfDNA result is never diagnostic — a screen-positive must be confirmed by CVS or amniocentesis before any irrevocable decision
  • A no-call cfDNA result (low fetal fraction) is not a negative result — it carries a higher background aneuploidy risk
  • A normal cfDNA result is not a normal fetus — it does not replace the anomaly scan and detects none of the single-gene disorders
  • Confined placental mosaicism means a cfDNA positive can sit beside a chromosomally normal fetus — never terminate on cfDNA alone
  • An isolated soft marker on the anomaly scan in a woman with a low-risk combined screen rarely changes management — do not reflexively escalate
On this page
Study tools

Your progress

Saved on this device.

Practise this topic8 MCQs with explanations

Target exams

FRANZCOGMRCOGABOGFRCSCMRCPI

Red flags

  • A cfDNA result is never diagnostic — a screen-positive must be confirmed by CVS or amniocentesis before any irrevocable decision
  • A no-call cfDNA result (low fetal fraction) is not a negative result — it carries a higher background aneuploidy risk
  • A normal cfDNA result is not a normal fetus — it does not replace the anomaly scan and detects none of the single-gene disorders
  • Confined placental mosaicism means a cfDNA positive can sit beside a chromosomally normal fetus — never terminate on cfDNA alone
  • An isolated soft marker on the anomaly scan in a woman with a low-risk combined screen rarely changes management — do not reflexively escalate
One-line fellowship answer

Prenatal screening for chromosomal conditions estimates a risk; it does not make a diagnosis. Offer first-trimester combined screening (about 80 percent detection at a 5 percent false-positive rate) or NIPT/cfDNA (about 99 percent detection at under 0.1 percent false-positive for trisomy 21), report the result as a risk, and confirm any screen-positive with chorionic villus sampling or amniocentesis before any irrevocable decision — a screening test is never diagnostic.[1][2][3]

A 36-year-old woman has just had her first-trimester combined screen and the phone call tells her she is "high risk". She is frightened, and the registrar's first sentence matters more than any number on the page. Screening for chromosomal conditions is one of the highest-yield topics in the fellowship exam because it tests three things at once: the performance of the tests, the biology behind them, and the counselling skill that turns a risk estimate into a decision. This topic holds all three. [3]

Overview and definition

Prenatal screening for chromosomal conditions is the estimation, before birth, of the probability that a fetus has a chromosomal abnormality — most commonly trisomy 21 (Down syndrome), and the rarer trisomies 18 and 13. It is offered to all pregnant women in the first trimester. [3]

The single idea that governs everything that follows: screening estimates a risk; it does not make a diagnosis. A woman with a screen-positive result usually has an unaffected fetus. The only way to know is a diagnostic test — chorionic villus sampling (CVS) or amniocentesis — which samples fetal cells and gives a karyotype or microarray. [3][4]

Screening versus diagnostic
"Screening sorts; diagnosis knows." A screening test divides the population into higher and lower risk; a diagnostic test tells you the truth for this fetus. Never act on a screening result as if it were a diagnosis — confirm first.[3]
Obstetrics & Gynaecology Pro

Continue reading

You have read the opening of this topic. The complete unit — every section and its primary-source references — is part of the Obstetrics & Gynaecology fellowship library.

Sign in to continueSee pricing
References12ShowHide
  1. [1]Gil MM, Accurti V, Santacruz B, et al. Analysis of cell-free DNA in maternal blood in screening for aneuploidies: updated meta-analysis Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2017.PMID 28397325
  2. [2]Malone FD, Canick JA, Ball RH, et al. First-trimester or second-trimester screening, or both, for Down's syndrome N Engl J Med, 2005.PMID 16282175
  3. [3]American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Screening for Fetal Chromosomal Abnormalities: ACOG Practice Bulletin, Number 226 Obstet Gynecol, 2020.PMID 32804883
  4. [4]American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Committee on Practice Bulletins Committee Opinion No. 640: Cell-Free DNA Screening for Fetal Aneuploidy Obstet Gynecol, 2015.PMID 26287791
  5. [5]Dungan JS, Klugman S, Darilek S, et al. Noninvasive prenatal screening (NIPS) for fetal chromosome abnormalities in a general-risk population: An evidence-based clinical guideline of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) Genet Med, 2023.PMID 36524989
  6. [6]Beta J, Zhang W, Geris S, et al. Procedure-related risk of miscarriage following chorionic villus sampling and amniocentesis Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2019.PMID 30977213
  7. [7]Santoli CMA, Anastasio MK, Sparks TN, et al. Unusual Maternal and Fetal Findings With Cell-Free DNA Screening Obstet Gynecol, 2024.PMID 39288158
  8. [8]Scheffer PG, Wirjosoekarto SAM, Becking EC, et al. Association between low fetal fraction in cell-free DNA testing and adverse pregnancy outcome: A systematic review Prenat Diagn, 2021.PMID 34350596
  9. [9]Kagan KO, Etchegaray A, Zhou Y, et al. Prospective validation of first-trimester combined screening for trisomy 21 Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2009.PMID 19526452
  10. [10]Gil MM, Galeva S, Jani J, et al. Cell-free DNA testing of maternal blood in screening for trisomies in twin pregnancy: updated cohort study Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2021.PMID 33838069
  11. [11]Gil MM, Accurti V, Santacruz B, et al. Analysis of cell-free DNA in maternal blood in screening for aneuploidies: updated meta-analysis Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2017.PMID 28397325
  12. [12]Malone FD, Canick JA, Ball RH, et al. First-trimester or second-trimester screening, or both, for Down's syndrome N Engl J Med, 2005.PMID 16282175

Test yourself

Practise what you just read

  • 8 MCQs
Obstetrics & Gynaecology Pro

$29/ monthor $279 / year

The complete Obstetrics & Gynaecology library, every exam format, one subscription.

  • Complete library for one chosen specialty
  • Timed MCQ mock exams and spaced review
  • Clinical cases & cross-table vivas
See pricingSign in
PreviousPrenatal diagnosisAntenatal care — prenatal diagnosisNextPreterm labour and birthIntrapartum care — preterm birth