Skip to main content
MedVellum
QuestionsVideosPricing

MedVellum

Fellowship exam preparation across every specialty: source-verified topics, questions in every format, and videos.

Product

  • Specialties
  • Questions
  • Videos
  • Exam tools
  • Pricing

Verification & policy

  • Verified register
  • Editorial policy
  • Privacy
  • Terms

Account

  • Sign in
  • Create account
  • Dashboard
  • Account & billing

© 2026 MedVellum. For education only — not a substitute for clinical judgement.

llms.txtPsychiatry LLM catalogSitemap

O&G SAQsGynaecological oncology — vulvar cancer and VIN

O&G SAQs · Gynaecological oncology — vulvar cancer and VIN

Vulvar cancer with a focal ulcer on lichen sclerosus — structured SAQ (15 marks)

FRANZCOG-format structured SAQ on vulvar squamous cell carcinoma arising on lichen sclerosus: the FIGO 2021 staging and depth-of-invasion definition, surgical management with sentinel node biopsy, the GROINSS-V evidence, the wound/lymphoedema morbidity data, and radiotherapy indications. Per-sub-part marking rubric included.

15 marks20 min2 min readVerification in progress

Target exams

FRANZCOGMRCOGABOGFRCSCMRCPI
On this page
Study tools

Target exams

FRANZCOGMRCOGABOGFRCSCMRCPI
Prompt
A 68-year-old woman with an eight-year history of vulvar lichen sclerosus presents with a 2.5 cm non-healing ulcer on the right labium majus of three months' duration. Punch biopsy confirms a moderately differentiated squamous cell carcinoma with stromal invasion of 4 mm. There are no palpable inguinofemoral nodes. CT shows no nodal or distant disease. (a) State the FIGO 2021 stage and explain how the depth of invasion is measured. (3 marks) (b) Describe the surgical management of the primary tumour and the groin nodes, justifying your choice of node assessment. (5 marks) (c) Reproduce the GROINSS-V evidence that supports sentinel node biopsy and quote the isolated groin recurrence rate for sentinel-node-negative patients. (3 marks) (d) Compare the wound and lymphoedema morbidity of sentinel node biopsy versus inguinofemoral lymphadenectomy, citing the contemporary population-based data. (2 marks) (e) State the radiotherapy indications in vulvar cancer. (2 marks)

Write your answer

Saved on this device. No marking — you are the marker.

How this SAQ is marked

Marks come from the FIGO 2021 staging and depth definition, the sentinel-node-based surgical management, the GROINSS-V evidence, the morbidity data, and the radiotherapy indications. Write in short labelled points. [1]

Reveal model answer and mark schemeShowHide

(a) FIGO 2021 stage and depth of invasion (3 marks)

  • Stage: Stage IB (a tumour over 2 cm in size or with stromal invasion over 1 mm, confined to the vulva with negative nodes). This tumour is 2.5 cm (over 2 cm) with invasion of 4 mm (over 1 mm). [1]
  • Depth of invasion (FIGO 2021): measured from the basement membrane of the deepest, adjacent, dysplastic, tumour-free rete ridge (or nearest dysplastic rete peg) to the deepest point of invasion. [1]
  • This is a change from the older method of measuring from the most superficial dermal papilla, and correlates better with outcome. [1]

(b) Surgical management — primary and groin (5 marks)

  • Primary tumour: wide local excision (radical local excision) with a 1 to 2 cm clinical margin through healthy tissue to the deep fascia. Radical vulvectomy is reserved for large, multifocal or locally advanced disease. [1]
  • Groin nodes: sentinel lymph node biopsy is the standard for early-stage, unifocal, node-negative disease. For a lesion over 1 cm from the midline, ipsilateral sentinel biopsy suffices; this lesion is lateralised on the right labium majus. [2]
  • Inguinofemoral lymphadenectomy is performed only if the sentinel node is positive. [2]
  • Stage IA (invasion up to 1 mm) would need no groin dissection — but this tumour invades 4 mm, so node assessment is mandatory. [1]

(c) GROINSS-V evidence (3 marks)

  • GROINSS-V (Te Grootenhuis 2016) enrolled 377 women with unifocal T1 squamous cell carcinoma under 4 cm who underwent the sentinel node procedure, with inguinofemoral lymphadenectomy only for sentinel metastases. [2]
  • At a median follow-up of 105 months, the isolated groin recurrence rate was 2.5 percent at 5 years for sentinel-node-negative patients. [2]
  • Disease-specific 10-year survival was 91 percent for sentinel-negative versus 65 percent for sentinel-positive patients. This is the safety evidence that made sentinel biopsy the standard. [2]

(d) Morbidity: sentinel versus inguinofemoral (2 marks)

  • Per the Rahm 2022 population-based study: persisting lymphoedema about 3.8 percent after sentinel biopsy versus about 38.6 percent after inguinofemoral lymphadenectomy; infection about 15 percent versus about 36 percent. [4]
  • Lymphoedema is near-ubiquitous when adjuvant groin radiotherapy follows a full lymphadenectomy — the double hit. [4]

(e) Radiotherapy indications (2 marks)

  • Positive or close surgical margins that cannot be re-resected. [1]
  • Positive lymph nodes (especially extracapsular spread or multiple nodes); primary chemoradiation for locally advanced disease; and recurrent disease not amenable to surgery. [1]

Common errors that lose marks

  • Staging this as Stage IA — it is over 1 mm invasion and over 2 cm, so Stage IB. [1]
  • Recommending a full bilateral inguinofemoral lymphadenectomy for an early-stage node-negative lateralised lesion — sentinel biopsy is the standard. [2]
  • Quoting the old depth-of-invasion method (from the dermal papilla). [1]
  • Omitting the GROINSS-V 2.5 percent groin recurrence figure. [2]
  • Treating differentiated VIN by ablation alone — it demands excision and lichen sclerosus treatment. [3]

Examiner notes

A high-scoring candidate stages this Stage IB, states the FIGO 2021 depth-of-invasion definition (from the adjacent dysplastic rete ridge), recommends wide local excision plus ipsilateral sentinel node biopsy, quotes the GROINSS-V 2.5 percent groin recurrence and the lymphoedema morbidity difference (about 4 percent versus about 39 percent), and lists the radiotherapy indications. [1][2][4]

References4ShowHide
  1. [1]Olawaiye AB, Cotler J, Cuello MA, Bhatla N, Okamoto A, Wilailak S, et al. FIGO staging for carcinoma of the vulva: 2021 revision. Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 2021.PMID 34520062
  2. [2]Te Grootenhuis NC, van der Zee AG, van Doorn HC, van der Velden J, Vergote I, Zanagnolo V, et al. Sentinel nodes in vulvar cancer: Long-term follow-up of the GROningen INternational Study on Sentinel nodes in Vulvar cancer (GROINSS-V) I. Gynecol Oncol, 2016.PMID 26428940
  3. [4]Rahm C, Adok C, Dahm-Kähler P, Bohlin KS Complications and risk factors in vulvar cancer surgery - A population-based study. Eur J Surg Oncol, 2022.PMID 35148915
  4. [3]Sideri M, Jones RW, Wilkinson EJ, Preti M, Heller DS, Scurry J, et al. Squamous vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia: 2004 modified terminology, ISSVD Vulvar Oncology Subcommittee. J Reprod Med, 2005.PMID 16419625
Obstetrics & Gynaecology Pro

$29/ monthor $279 / year

The complete Obstetrics & Gynaecology library, every exam format, one subscription.

  • Complete library for one chosen specialty
  • Timed MCQ mock exams and spaced review
  • Clinical cases & cross-table vivas
See pricingSign in
PreviousVulval lichen sclerosus and the focal ulcer — structured SAQ (15 marks)Gynaecological health — vulval disordersNextYolk sac tumour in a young woman — structured SAQ (15 marks)Gynaecological oncology — non-epithelial ovarian tumours