O&G SAQs · Gynaecological surgery — intraoperative complications and lower urinary tract injury
Ureteric injury at laparoscopic hysterectomy — structured SAQ (15 marks)
FRANZCOG-format structured SAQ on an intraoperatively recognised left ureteric injury at laparoscopic hysterectomy: confirmation and characterisation, the four points of ureteric risk and the uterine artery relationship, distal ureteric reconstruction (ureteroneocystostomy, psoas hitch, Boari flap, ureteroureterostomy), and the evidence on prophylactic ureteric catheterisation and cystoscopy. Per-sub-part marking rubric included.
On this page
Study tools
Target exams
How this SAQ is marked
Twelve SAQs, 180 marks, two 2-hour papers — roughly 15 marks and 20 minutes each. Marks come from specifics: named anatomical point, named reconstruction, dose, evidence number. Write in short labelled points, not prose paragraphs. Answer the sub-part you are asked. [1]
Reveal model answer and mark schemeShowHide
(a) Immediate intraoperative management — confirm and characterise (5 marks)
One mark per point, maximum five. [1][4]
- Stop and call for help — pause the dissection, call your consultant and a urologist, and tell the anaesthetist; do not close and hope.[1]
- Re-confirm with a dye agent — give indigo carmine (or methylene blue, after checking for SSRIs or MAOIs) intravenously, or 10 percent sodium fluorescein 0.25 to 1.0 mL intravenously, and observe for a jet within minutes; an absent jet after several minutes is an injury until proven otherwise.[8]
- Direct visualisation / intraureteral ICG — trace the whole pelvic ureter; where available, intraureteral indocyanine green with near-infrared imaging confirms its course and integrity.[7]
- Retrograde pyelogram — if jets remain absent, pass an open-ended ureteric catheter at cystoscopy and image up the ureter to define obstruction, transection and extravasation; this is the definitive intraoperative test.[9]
- Define the level, mechanism and devitalised length — distal versus mid versus proximal; transection versus ligation versus crush versus thermal; and the length of any thermally damaged segment, which dictates whether debridement and reconstruction are needed.[4]
(b) Points of ureteric risk and the uterine artery relationship (4 marks)
One mark per point (up to four), with the relationship named for full marks. [3]
- Infundibulopelvic (IP / suspensory) ligament at the pelvic brim, where the ureter crosses the common iliac bifurcation lateral to the ovarian vessels.[3]
- Ovarian fossa — the ureter lies posterior and lateral to the ovary and is dragged up with an adherent ovary or mass.[3]
- Uterine artery crossover ("water under the bridge") — the uterine artery runs above and anterior to the ureter at the level of the internal cervical os; this is the classic point of injury when clamping or suturing the uterine vessels, and the relationship examiners never retire.[3]
- Ureteric tunnel of the cardinal (Mackenrodt) ligament — where the ureter passes medially and inferiorly to enter the bladder; the territory of radical hysterectomy and the site of the classic postoperative ureterovaginal fistula.[3]
(c) Definitive repair principles for a distal thermal transection (4 marks)
One mark per principle; name the distal reconstruction options for full marks. [9][13]
- Debride generously to viable margins — a thermal injury extends beyond the visible burn, so resect the damaged segment before any anastomosis; repair must be tension-free over a double-J stent with a retroperitoneal drain, and the repair tested (dye or imaging).[4][16]
- Distal injury → ureteroneocystostomy (reimplantation) into a tension-free bladder anastomosis; if length is inadequate, add a psoas hitch and, if still short, a Boari flap.[9][13]
- Mid-segment alternative — ureteroureterostomy — Wang showed laparoscopic ureteroureterostomy is a feasible, safe, antireflux-preserving option for distal gynaecological injury, with less blood loss and less reflux than reimplantation in experienced hands.[9]
- Stent, drain, test, and follow up — double-J stent until the anastomosis heals, drain the field, confirm the repair, and image after stent removal to exclude a late stricture; the EAU review reports 87 percent pooled success and 2.3 percent renal unit loss overall.[15]
(d) Evidence on prophylactic catheters and cystoscopy detection (2 marks)
One mark per correct statement. [1][6]
- Prophylactic ureteric catheterisation does not reduce ureteric injury — the Gurumurthy systematic review found no association with lower injury risk (RCT risk ratio 0.9, 95 percent CI 0.49 to 1.65) and an increased risk of urinary tract infection; catheters aid identification only.[6]
- Cystoscopy is the detection lever — routine intraoperative cystoscopy markedly increases the intraoperative detection of urinary tract injury, with a published sensitivity of 80 to 90 percent for ureteral trauma (AAGL); FINHYST found only 10 percent of ureter injuries were recognised intraoperatively without such vigilance.[1][4]
References11ShowHide
- [1]Teeluckdharry B, Gilmour D, Flowerdew G Urinary Tract Injury at Benign Gynecologic Surgery and the Role of Cystoscopy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Obstet Gynecol, 2015.PMID 26551173
- [3]Gilmour DT, Dwyer PL, Carey MP Lower urinary tract injury during gynecologic surgery and its detection by intraoperative cystoscopy Obstet Gynecol, 1999.PMID 10546778
- [4]AAGL Advancing Minimally Invasive Gynecology Worldwide AAGL Practice Report: Practice guidelines for intraoperative cystoscopy in laparoscopic hysterectomy J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 2012.PMID 22748947
- [5]American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists ACOG Committee Opinion No. 372: The Role of cystourethroscopy in the generalist obstetrician-gynecologist practice Obstet Gynecol, 2007.PMID 17601926
- [6]Gurumurthy M, McGee AE, Saraswat L Prophylactic ureteric catheterisation during complex gynaecological surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis BJOG, 2024.PMID 38602151
- [7]Zhang V, Mantri D, Yang Q, Guan X Indocyanine green for intraoperative ureteral identification in gynecologic surgery: A preliminary systematic review of feasibility, safety, and surgical outcomes Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 2026.PMID 42007650
- [8]Doyle PJ, Lipetskaia L, Duecy E, Buchsbaum G, Wood RW Sodium fluorescein use during intraoperative cystoscopy Obstet Gynecol, 2015.PMID 25730214
- [9]Wang Z, Chen Z, He Y, Li B, Wen Z, Chen X Laparoscopic ureteroureterostomy with an intraoperative retrograde ureteroscopy-assisted technique for distal ureteral injury secondary to gynecological surgery: a retrospective comparison with laparoscopic ureteroneocystostomy Scand J Urol, 2017.PMID 28388304
- [13]Morey AF, Broghammer JA, Hollowell CMP, McKibben MJ, Souter L Urotrauma Guideline 2020: AUA Guideline J Urol, 2021.PMID 33053308
- [15]Scilipoti P, Nannola N, Zorzi F, Gonzalez CG, Chicaud M, Candela L, Moretto S, Nedbal C, Tefik T, Villa L, Ventimiglia E, Salonia A, Briganti A, Montorsi F, Somani BK, Doizi S, Traxer O, Panthier F Iatrogenic ureteric injuries after abdominal surgery: a systematic review and meta-regression from the European Association of Urology Endourology Section BJU Int, 2026.PMID 42023813
- [16]Sokol AI, Paraiso MF, Cogan SL, Bedaiwy MA, Escobar PF, Barber MD Prevention of vesicovaginal fistulas after laparoscopic hysterectomy with electrosurgical cystotomy in female mongrel dogs Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2004.PMID 15041991