O&G SAQs · Gynaecological health — menstrual disorders
Postmenopausal bleeding — structured SAQ (15 marks)
FRANZCOG-format structured SAQ on postmenopausal bleeding: the definition and the 9% pooled cancer risk (Clarke 2018), the transvaginal-ultrasound endometrial-thickness threshold (Karlsson and Smith-Bindman numbers), the Pipelle-versus-sonohysterography-versus-hysteroscopy sampling ladder, the RCOG GTG 67 split of non-atypical versus atypical hyperplasia, and tamoxifen-related bleeding. Per-sub-part marking rubric included.
On this page
Study tools
Target exams
How this SAQ is marked
Marks come from the verbatim definition and the sourced 9% cancer risk, the transvaginal-ultrasound threshold with the Karlsson and Smith-Bindman numbers, the structured sampling ladder, and the RCOG GTG 67 split of hyperplasia. Write in short labelled points. [1]
Reveal model answer and mark schemeShowHide
(a) Definition and cancer risk (3 marks)
- Definition (1 mark): postmenopausal bleeding is any vaginal bleeding 12 months or more after the last menstrual period.
- Pooled cancer risk (1 mark): about 9% (95% CI 8-11%), with about 91% of endometrial cancers presenting with PMB.
- Source (1 mark): the Clarke 2018 systematic review and meta-analysis in JAMA Internal Medicine (129 studies, 40,790 women).[1]
(b) One-stop pathway and the threshold (5 marks)
- Pathway (2 marks): focused history and examination (exclude a cervical / vulval / urinary / rectal source), transvaginal ultrasound to measure the double-layer endometrial thickness and look for a focal lesion, then endometrial sampling when thickened or when a focal lesion is seen.
- Karlsson threshold (2 marks): at an endometrial thickness of 4 mm or less the residual risk of any endometrial abnormality was about 5.5%, and no malignant endometrium was thinner than 5 mm (mean cancer thickness 21.1 mm).[2]
- Smith-Bindman corroboration (1 mark): using a 5 mm threshold, 96% (95% CI 94-98%) of cancers had an abnormal scan — high sensitivity, but a thin endometrium does not close the case if bleeding persists.[3]
(c) Sampling tools and the safety-net (3 marks)
- Pipelle for diffuse thickening with no focal lesion (but it can miss a focal lesion — its accuracy is quantified in the Dijkhuizen meta-analysis).[5]
- Saline contrast sonohysterography when a focal intracavitary lesion is suspected; hysteroscopy with directed biopsy for a focal lesion, a failed or non-diagnostic Pipelle, or persistent bleeding despite a thin endometrium.
- Safety-net (1 mark): a single normal thin endometrium plus a negative biopsy is reassuring but not absolute — recurrent or persistent PMB is re-investigated.
(d) GTG 67 hyperplasia and tamoxifen (4 marks)
- RCOG Green-top 67 split (2 marks): non-atypical hyperplasia — first-line LNG-IUS or oral progestin with surveillance biopsy until two consecutive negatives; atypical hyperplasia (EIN) — hysterectomy for a woman not preserving fertility, given the high concurrent-cancer and progression risk (the Henderson 2024 UK audit confirms the shift to first-line medical management of non-atypical disease and stresses tight follow-up of atypical disease in non-hysterectomy patients).[7]
- Tamoxifen (2 marks): bleeding on tamoxifen is PMB and is investigated as for any PMB — never attributed to the drug without excluding cancer. Tamoxifen-related polyps and subendometrial cysts can artefactually thicken the measured endometrium, skewing the threshold decision; routine screening ultrasound of an asymptomatic woman on tamoxifen is not recommended.[6]
References7ShowHide
- [1]Clarke MA, Long BJ, Del Mar Morillo A, et al. Association of Endometrial Cancer Risk With Postmenopausal Bleeding in Women: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Intern Med, 2018.PMID 30083701
- [2]Karlsson B, Granberg S, Wikland M, et al. Transvaginal ultrasonography of the endometrium in women with postmenopausal bleeding--a Nordic multicenter study. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 1995.PMID 7755059
- [3]Smith-Bindman R, Kerlikowske K, Feldstein VA, et al. Endovaginal ultrasound to exclude endometrial cancer and other endometrial abnormalities. JAMA, 1998.PMID 9809732
- [4]Vroom FR, Prins MM, Bongers MY, et al. Endometrial SamPling befoRe or aftEr Saline infusion SOnography (ESPRESSO Trial): a national survey and a study protocol of a multicenter RCT. Minerva Ginecol, 2017.PMID 28252269
- [5]Dijkhuizen FP, Mol BW, Brölmann HA, et al. The accuracy of endometrial sampling in the diagnosis of patients with endometrial carcinoma and hyperplasia: a meta-analysis. Cancer, 2000.PMID 11042572
- [6]Wolfman W, Leyland N, Heywood M, Singh SS, et al. Asymptomatic endometrial thickening. J Obstet Gynaecol Can, 2010.PMID 21176311
- [7]Henderson E, Black G, Khattak A, et al. Diagnosis and management of endometrial hyperplasia: A UK national audit of adherence to national guidance 2012-2020. PLoS Med, 2024.PMID 38421942