O&G SAQs · Perioperative care — positioning and nerve injuries
Surgical positioning and nerve injuries — structured SAQ (15 marks)
FRANZCOG-format structured SAQ on surgical positioning and nerve injuries: brachial plexus injury after robotic radical hysterectomy, bedside assessment with documentation, differential diagnosis, indications for further investigation, and prevention. Per-sub-part marking rubric included.
On this page
Study tools
Target exams
How this SAQ is marked
Twelve SAQs, 180 marks, two 2-hour papers — roughly 15 marks and 20 minutes each. Marks come from specifics: the named nerve, the named mechanism, the named documentation, the named investigation, the named prevention. Write in short labelled points, not prose paragraphs. Answer the sub-part you are asked.[1]
Reveal model answer and mark schemeShowHide
(a) Most likely nerve injury and mechanism (3 marks)
One mark per element, maximum three. [3]
- Nerve: brachial plexus injury, upper trunk (C5-C6) distribution. The pattern of weakness (shoulder abduction, external rotation, elbow flexion) and the dermatomal distribution point to upper trunk involvement.
- Mechanism: prolonged steep Trendelenburg with shoulder abduction >90 degrees and external rotation stretches the brachial plexus against the humeral head; the operative time of 4 hours exceeds the safe threshold for position without reassessment.
- Predisposing factors: diabetes, low BMI, alcohol excess, vitamin deficiency, previous nerve injury; time in steep Trendelenburg; arm position in relation to the patient's anatomy.[3]
Bands: name the nerve; name the mechanism; name the risk factors.
(b) Bedside assessment and documentation (4 marks)
One mark per aspect, marked for completeness. [1][2]
- Motor examination: MRC power scale 0-5 for shoulder abduction, external rotation, elbow flexion, wrist extension, finger abduction, hip flexion, knee extension, ankle dorsiflexion (screening the contralateral side for comparison).
- Sensory examination: dermatomal mapping C4-T1 for upper limb; document light touch, pinprick, proprioception in the affected distribution.
- Reflexes: biceps (C5-C6), triceps (C7), brachioradialis (C5-C6); compare with the contralateral side.
- Documentation: time of detection, name of assessor, limb tested, position used (Trendelenburg angle, arm position, padding, duration), intervention (repositioning, padding added), subsequent examination findings; allocate blame is NOT documented.[1]
(c) Management plan, differential diagnosis and indications for further investigation (5 marks)
One mark per element, marked for specificity. [2][6]
- Immediate repositioning: recheck the patient's position, remove the Trendelenburg, return to supine, ensure padding; reassess the deficit at 15-30 minutes.
- Counsel the patient: explain the cause, the likely prognosis (neurapraxia recovers in days to 6 weeks, axonotmesis in months), and the recovery curve; commit to follow-up.
- Differential diagnosis: exclude central cause (stroke, spinal cord compression — MRI brain/spine if bilateral or upper motor neuron signs); exclude shoulder dislocation, glenohumeral injury, clavicular fracture; exclude compartment syndrome (lower extremity, the reverse Trendelenburg repositioning could precipitate it).
- Indications for neurology referral: any motor deficit at 48 hours; any deficit at 7 days; EMG/nerve conduction studies at 3-6 weeks to localise the lesion and quantify severity; repeat at 3-6 months for prognosis.
- Multidisciplinary engagement: physiotherapy, occupational therapy, pain service (gabapentin, pregabalin, duloxetine for neuropathic pain); incident report, MOPS review, root cause analysis; notify medical indemnity.[1]
(d) Prevention strategy (3 marks)
- Arm position: tuck both arms at the patient's side with foam padding; avoid shoulder abduction >90 degrees; avoid external rotation.
- Trendelenburg angle: limit to under 45 degrees; reverse every 2-3 hours; consider lower extremity compression devices.
- Positioning standardisation: team brief and debrief; document the position, time of placement, padding used, planned time of removal; intra-op reassessment every 30-60 minutes; ASA Practice Advisory 2018 standard of care (padded arm boards, neutral position, head rotation under 30 degrees, eye protection, documentation).[4][5]
References6ShowHide
- [1]Grant I, Brovman EY, Kang D, et al. A medicolegal analysis of positioning-related perioperative peripheral nerve injuries occurring between 1996 and 2015 J Clin Anesth, 2019.PMID 31128482
- [2]Chui J, Murkin JM, Posner KL, et al. Perioperative Peripheral Nerve Injury After General Anesthesia: A Qualitative Systematic Review Anesth Analg, 2018.PMID 29787414
- [3]Shveiky D, Aseff JN, Iglesia CB Brachial plexus injury after laparoscopic and robotic surgery J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 2010.PMID 20621005
- [4]Grossmann NC, Aschwanden FJ, Cornelius J, et al. Impact of patient positioning during surgery on neuropathies after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a randomised controlled trial BJU Int, 2025.PMID 39668142
- [5]Nelson G, Bakkum-Gamez J, Kalogera E, et al. Guidelines for perioperative care in gynecologic/oncology: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Society recommendations-2019 update Int J Gynecol Cancer, 2019.PMID 30877144
- [6]Williams B The National Early Warning Score: from concept to NHS implementation Clin Med (Lond), 2022.PMID 36427887