Skip to main content
MedVellum
QuestionsVideosPricing

MedVellum

Fellowship exam preparation across every specialty: source-verified topics, questions in every format, and videos.

Product

  • Specialties
  • Questions
  • Videos
  • Exam tools
  • Pricing

Verification & policy

  • Verified register
  • Editorial policy
  • Privacy
  • Terms

Account

  • Sign in
  • Create account
  • Dashboard
  • Account & billing

© 2026 MedVellum. For education only — not a substitute for clinical judgement.

llms.txtPsychiatry LLM catalogSitemap

O&G SAQsPerioperative care — positioning and nerve injuries

O&G SAQs · Perioperative care — positioning and nerve injuries

Surgical positioning and nerve injuries — structured SAQ (15 marks)

FRANZCOG-format structured SAQ on surgical positioning and nerve injuries: brachial plexus injury after robotic radical hysterectomy, bedside assessment with documentation, differential diagnosis, indications for further investigation, and prevention. Per-sub-part marking rubric included.

15 marks20 min3 min readVerification in progress

Target exams

FRANZCOGMRCOGABOG
On this page
Study tools

Target exams

FRANZCOGMRCOGABOG
Prompt
A 52-year-old has a robotic radical hysterectomy in steep Trendelenburg for early cervical cancer. The case takes 4 hours. On PACU review, the patient has a weak left arm and numbness in the C5-C6 dermatomal distribution. (a) Identify the most likely nerve injury and the mechanism. (3 marks) (b) Outline the bedside assessment of the deficit, with the documentation required. (4 marks) (c) Outline the management plan, including the differential diagnosis and the indications for further investigation. (5 marks) (d) Outline the prevention strategy for the next case. (3 marks)

How this SAQ is marked

Twelve SAQs, 180 marks, two 2-hour papers — roughly 15 marks and 20 minutes each. Marks come from specifics: the named nerve, the named mechanism, the named documentation, the named investigation, the named prevention. Write in short labelled points, not prose paragraphs. Answer the sub-part you are asked.[1]

Reveal model answer and mark schemeShowHide

(a) Most likely nerve injury and mechanism (3 marks)

One mark per element, maximum three. [3]

  • Nerve: brachial plexus injury, upper trunk (C5-C6) distribution. The pattern of weakness (shoulder abduction, external rotation, elbow flexion) and the dermatomal distribution point to upper trunk involvement.
  • Mechanism: prolonged steep Trendelenburg with shoulder abduction >90 degrees and external rotation stretches the brachial plexus against the humeral head; the operative time of 4 hours exceeds the safe threshold for position without reassessment.
  • Predisposing factors: diabetes, low BMI, alcohol excess, vitamin deficiency, previous nerve injury; time in steep Trendelenburg; arm position in relation to the patient's anatomy.[3]

Bands: name the nerve; name the mechanism; name the risk factors.

(b) Bedside assessment and documentation (4 marks)

One mark per aspect, marked for completeness. [1][2]

  • Motor examination: MRC power scale 0-5 for shoulder abduction, external rotation, elbow flexion, wrist extension, finger abduction, hip flexion, knee extension, ankle dorsiflexion (screening the contralateral side for comparison).
  • Sensory examination: dermatomal mapping C4-T1 for upper limb; document light touch, pinprick, proprioception in the affected distribution.
  • Reflexes: biceps (C5-C6), triceps (C7), brachioradialis (C5-C6); compare with the contralateral side.
  • Documentation: time of detection, name of assessor, limb tested, position used (Trendelenburg angle, arm position, padding, duration), intervention (repositioning, padding added), subsequent examination findings; allocate blame is NOT documented.[1]

(c) Management plan, differential diagnosis and indications for further investigation (5 marks)

One mark per element, marked for specificity. [2][6]

  • Immediate repositioning: recheck the patient's position, remove the Trendelenburg, return to supine, ensure padding; reassess the deficit at 15-30 minutes.
  • Counsel the patient: explain the cause, the likely prognosis (neurapraxia recovers in days to 6 weeks, axonotmesis in months), and the recovery curve; commit to follow-up.
  • Differential diagnosis: exclude central cause (stroke, spinal cord compression — MRI brain/spine if bilateral or upper motor neuron signs); exclude shoulder dislocation, glenohumeral injury, clavicular fracture; exclude compartment syndrome (lower extremity, the reverse Trendelenburg repositioning could precipitate it).
  • Indications for neurology referral: any motor deficit at 48 hours; any deficit at 7 days; EMG/nerve conduction studies at 3-6 weeks to localise the lesion and quantify severity; repeat at 3-6 months for prognosis.
  • Multidisciplinary engagement: physiotherapy, occupational therapy, pain service (gabapentin, pregabalin, duloxetine for neuropathic pain); incident report, MOPS review, root cause analysis; notify medical indemnity.[1]

(d) Prevention strategy (3 marks)

One mark per element. [4][5]

  • Arm position: tuck both arms at the patient's side with foam padding; avoid shoulder abduction >90 degrees; avoid external rotation.
  • Trendelenburg angle: limit to under 45 degrees; reverse every 2-3 hours; consider lower extremity compression devices.
  • Positioning standardisation: team brief and debrief; document the position, time of placement, padding used, planned time of removal; intra-op reassessment every 30-60 minutes; ASA Practice Advisory 2018 standard of care (padded arm boards, neutral position, head rotation under 30 degrees, eye protection, documentation).[4][5]
Obstetrics & Gynaecology Pro

Continue reading

You have read the opening of this SAQ. The complete unit — every section and its primary-source references — is part of the Obstetrics & Gynaecology fellowship library.

Sign in to continueSee pricing
References6ShowHide
  1. [1]Grant I, Brovman EY, Kang D, et al. A medicolegal analysis of positioning-related perioperative peripheral nerve injuries occurring between 1996 and 2015 J Clin Anesth, 2019.PMID 31128482
  2. [2]Chui J, Murkin JM, Posner KL, et al. Perioperative Peripheral Nerve Injury After General Anesthesia: A Qualitative Systematic Review Anesth Analg, 2018.PMID 29787414
  3. [3]Shveiky D, Aseff JN, Iglesia CB Brachial plexus injury after laparoscopic and robotic surgery J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 2010.PMID 20621005
  4. [4]Grossmann NC, Aschwanden FJ, Cornelius J, et al. Impact of patient positioning during surgery on neuropathies after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a randomised controlled trial BJU Int, 2025.PMID 39668142
  5. [5]Nelson G, Bakkum-Gamez J, Kalogera E, et al. Guidelines for perioperative care in gynecologic/oncology: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Society recommendations-2019 update Int J Gynecol Cancer, 2019.PMID 30877144
  6. [6]Williams B The National Early Warning Score: from concept to NHS implementation Clin Med (Lond), 2022.PMID 36427887
Obstetrics & Gynaecology Pro

$29/ monthor $279 / year

The complete Obstetrics & Gynaecology library, every exam format, one subscription.

  • Complete library for one chosen specialty
  • Timed MCQ mock exams and spaced review
  • Clinical cases & cross-table vivas
See pricingSign in
PreviousSurgical management of miscarriage and abortion — structured SAQ (15 marks)Gynae-surgery — early pregnancy and abortion careNextSurvivorship and MDT working — structured SAQ (15 marks)Gynaecological oncology — survivorship and MDT working