Skip to main content
MedVellum
QuestionsVideosPricing

MedVellum

Fellowship exam preparation across every specialty: source-verified topics, questions in every format, and videos.

Product

  • Specialties
  • Questions
  • Videos
  • Exam tools
  • Pricing

Verification & policy

  • Verified register
  • Editorial policy
  • Privacy
  • Terms

Account

  • Sign in
  • Create account
  • Dashboard
  • Account & billing

© 2026 MedVellum. For education only — not a substitute for clinical judgement.

llms.txtPsychiatry LLM catalogSitemap

O&G SAQsPre-pregnancy and antenatal care — placental disorders

O&G SAQs · Pre-pregnancy and antenatal care — placental disorders

Placenta accreta spectrum — structured SAQ (15 marks)

FRANZCOG-format structured SAQ on placenta accreta spectrum: targeted imaging and its accuracy, multidisciplinary antenatal planning and timing of birth, the operative sequence of caesarean hysterectomy, and evidence-based counselling on uterine preservation. Includes per-sub-part mark scheme, common errors and examiner notes.

15 marks20 min5 min readVerification in progress

Target exams

FRANZCOGMRCOGABOG
On this page
Study tools

Target exams

FRANZCOGMRCOGABOG
Prompt
You are the obstetric registrar in a tertiary antenatal clinic. A 38-year-old G5P4 attends at 30 weeks. She has had three previous lower-segment caesarean sections and one vaginal birth. Her 30-week scan reports: anterior placenta praevia covering the os, multiple placental lacunae, loss of the retroplacental clear zone, and thinning of the myometrium over the lower anterior segment. She is asymptomatic. (a) State the further assessment you would arrange and what specific findings you are looking for. (4 marks) (b) Outline your antenatal plan up to the day of birth, including timing and the personnel involved. (4 marks) (c) Outline the key operative steps of a planned caesarean hysterectomy for placenta accreta spectrum, with the reason for each. (4 marks) (d) She asks whether her uterus can be preserved. Counsel her using the available evidence. (3 marks)

How this SAQ is marked

Twelve SAQs, 180 marks, two 2-hour papers — about 15 marks and 20 minutes each. Marks live in specifics: the named sign, the named grade, the gestation, the personnel, the operative step and the reason for it. Write short labelled points. Answer the sub-part you were asked. [1]

Read the stem again before you write. Praevia plus three previous caesareans carries an accreta risk of roughly 40%, and the scan already describes three standardised signs. This is not a "could it be accreta" question — it is a "you know it is, now show me your plan" question.[2][3]

Reveal model answer and mark schemeShowHide

(a) Further assessment and the findings you are looking for (4 marks)

One mark each, maximum four. Marks for naming the modality AND the specific finding. [1][3]

  • Specialist repeat ultrasound with colour Doppler, transabdominal and transvaginal, by an operator experienced in placenta accreta spectrum. Looking for the standardised descriptors: loss of the clear zone, placental lacunae, myometrial thinning, bladder wall interruption, placental bulge, uterovesical hypervascularity and bridging vessels. Ultrasound in at-risk women has a sensitivity of about 90.7% and specificity of about 96.9%.[3][1]
  • MRI as an adjunct for topography, not for exclusion — depth of invasion, parametrial and bladder extension, and posterior involvement. Sensitivity about 94.4% and specificity about 84.0%, with no significant accuracy advantage over ultrasound, so a normal MRI does not exclude percreta.[4]
  • Specifically document bladder involvement. In the multicentre imaging analysis, bladder wall interruption was the only ultrasound descriptor that independently predicted percreta (odds ratio 3.23, 95% CI 1.33–7.79).[5]
  • Haematological and transfusion work-up: full blood count and iron studies with active correction of anaemia, group and antibody screen, coagulation screen, and confirmation that crossmatched units and cell salvage will be available on the day.[1][6]

A mark is also available for stating that antenatal imaging raises suspicion but the diagnosis is confirmed clinically at birth and by histopathology, graded with the FIGO clinical classification. [1]

(b) Antenatal plan to the day of birth (4 marks)

One mark each, maximum four. [6][7]

  • Refer to the multidisciplinary placenta accreta spectrum team and name it: senior obstetrician experienced in PAS surgery, obstetric anaesthetist, urologist, interventional radiologist, haematologist and transfusion service, neonatologist, theatre and intensive care. A standardised multidisciplinary approach reduced blood loss and emergency delivery even though the team's cases were more severe.[6]
  • Confirm care in a resourced centre with a blood bank able to deliver a massive transfusion, interventional radiology, urology and an intensive care bed. Arrange antenatal relocation if she lives remotely.[1][6]
  • Plan a scheduled caesarean at 34 to 36 weeks, with antenatal corticosteroids timed to that date and a neonatal cot booked. The decision analysis favours 34 weeks, and amniocentesis for lung maturity does not improve outcomes at any gestation. Bring the date forward for bleeding.[7][1]
  • Consent and counselling documented in detail: likely caesarean hysterectomy with permanent loss of fertility, massive transfusion, bladder or ureteric injury, relaparotomy, intensive care admission, and a late-preterm baby who may need neonatal care. Include a plan for antepartum bleeding, with admission and an escalation trigger, and give her written information.[1][8]

(c) Operative steps of planned caesarean hysterectomy, with reasons (4 marks)

Half a mark per step and half a mark per reason, maximum four. "Caesarean hysterectomy" without the sequence scores poorly. [8][1]

StepReason
Midline or generous transverse laparotomy; senior surgeons scrubbed; urology availableAdequate access to a hypervascular lower segment and to the bladder dissection
Inspect the serosa and map the upper placental edge (antenatal map or intraoperative ultrasound)The incision site is chosen from where the placenta is, not from habit
Hysterotomy remote from the placenta — fundal, classical or high transverseCutting through an anterior placenta initiates the haemorrhage you are trying to avoid
Deliver the baby, clamp the cord short, leave the placenta completely undisturbedAny attempt at separation opens a hypervascular bed in a segment that cannot retract
Close the hysterotomy, then proceed to hysterectomy with the placenta in situRemoves the bleeding organ intact rather than fighting a partially separated bed
Total rather than subtotal hysterectomy in praeviaThe bleeding lower segment and cervix must be removed for haemostasis
Identify ureters early; formal bladder dissection with urology where percreta is suspectedBladder and ureteric injury are the commonest non-haemorrhagic complications
[8][1]

Also creditable: tranexamic acid, cell salvage, warmed products, a running quantitative loss tally, and a stated decision point for escalation. [1][6]

(d) Counselling on uterine preservation (3 marks)

One mark per element, maximum three. Full marks need numbers, not reassurance. [9][10]

  • What conservative management is: the placenta is deliberately left in situ, partially or completely, with no attempt at forcible removal, and the uterus retained. It is offered only in centres with the resources and follow-up to support it.[9]
  • The figures to quote: in the largest multicentre series of 167 women, the uterus was preserved in 78.4% (95% CI 71.4–84.4), primary hysterectomy was needed in 10.8% and delayed hysterectomy in a further 10.8%, and severe maternal morbidity occurred in 6.0% — sepsis, fistula, injury to adjacent organs, renal failure and thromboembolism. Spontaneous placental resorption occurred in 75% at a median of 13.5 weeks, so follow-up runs for months.[9]
  • The honest caveats: one woman in that series died from intraumbilical methotrexate toxicity, so adjuvant methotrexate is not recommended; delayed interval hysterectomy is an option in expert centres with lower blood loss in selected patients but carries its own interval risk; and recurrence in a subsequent pregnancy is real, so she should be counselled about contraception and about high-risk care next time.[9][10]

A mark is lost for promising uterine preservation, and for offering conservative management without naming the morbidity or the length of follow-up. [9]

Obstetrics & Gynaecology Pro

Continue reading

You have read the opening of this SAQ. The complete unit — every section and its primary-source references — is part of the Obstetrics & Gynaecology fellowship library.

Sign in to continueSee pricing
References10ShowHide
  1. [1]Jauniaux E, Bhide A, Hussein AM, et al. Placenta Praevia and Placenta Accreta Spectrum: Diagnosis and Management: Green-Top Guideline No. 27a BJOG, 2026.PMID 42374711
  2. [2]Silver RM, Landon MB, Rouse DJ, et al. Maternal morbidity associated with multiple repeat cesarean deliveries Obstet Gynecol, 2006.PMID 16738145
  3. [3]D'Antonio F, Iacovella C, Bhide A Prenatal identification of invasive placentation using ultrasound: systematic review and meta-analysis Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2013.PMID 23943408
  4. [4]D'Antonio F, Iacovella C, Palacios-Jaraquemada J, et al. Prenatal identification of invasive placentation using magnetic resonance imaging: systematic review and meta-analysis Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2014.PMID 24515654
  5. [5]Morel O, van Beekhuizen HJ, Braun T, et al. Performance of antenatal imaging to predict placenta accreta spectrum degree of severity Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, 2021.PMID 33811333
  6. [6]Shamshirsaz AA, Fox KA, Salmanian B, et al. Maternal morbidity in patients with morbidly adherent placenta treated with and without a standardized multidisciplinary approach Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2015.PMID 25173187
  7. [7]Robinson BK, Grobman WA Effectiveness of timing strategies for delivery of individuals with placenta previa and accreta Obstet Gynecol, 2010.PMID 20859146
  8. [8]Allen L, Jauniaux E, Hobson S, et al. FIGO consensus guidelines on placenta accreta spectrum disorders: Nonconservative surgical management Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 2018.PMID 29405317
  9. [9]Sentilhes L, Ambroselli C, Kayem G, et al. Maternal outcome after conservative treatment of placenta accreta Obstet Gynecol, 2010.PMID 20177283
  10. [10]Zuckerwise LC, Craig AM, Newton JM, et al. Outcomes following a clinical algorithm allowing for delayed hysterectomy in the management of severe placenta accreta spectrum Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2020.PMID 31469990
Obstetrics & Gynaecology Pro

$29/ monthor $279 / year

The complete Obstetrics & Gynaecology library, every exam format, one subscription.

  • Complete library for one chosen specialty
  • Timed MCQ mock exams and spaced review
  • Clinical cases & cross-table vivas
See pricingSign in
PreviousPhysiological changes of pregnancy for critical care — structured SAQ (15 marks)Critical care — maternal physiologyNextVasa praevia — structured SAQ (15 marks)Pre-pregnancy and antenatal care — placental disorders