O&G SAQs · Sexual and reproductive health — long-acting reversible contraception
Long-acting reversible contraception — structured SAQ (15 marks)
FRANZCOG-format structured SAQ on LARC counselling, durations of use, IUD insertion technique and the lost threads algorithm. Per-sub-part marking rubric included.
On this page
Study tools
Target exams
How this SAQ is marked
Twelve SAQs, 180 marks, two 2-hour papers — roughly 15 marks and 20 minutes each. Marks come from specifics: named method, duration, dose, contraindication, threshold, time window, the 4 T's of any structured answer. Write in short labelled points, not prose paragraphs. Answer the sub-part you are asked. [6]
Reveal model answer and mark schemeShowHide
(a) Contraceptive counselling framework — why LARC is first-line (4 marks)
One mark per point, with reasoning. [6][1][5]
- Apply the WHO MEC framework — categories 1 to 4 — to her characteristics: BMI 31 obesity (Category 1 for ENG implant, 52 mg LNG-IUS and Cu-IUD), age under 35 (she is below the smoker 15+ cigarettes/day, age 35+ CHC threshold), no migraine, regular periods and prior treated chlamydia. All three LARC methods are Category 1 to 2 for her; combined hormonal contraception is Category 1 with no other risk factors, but LARC outperforms CHC on typical-use failure rate.[5][6]
- Lead with the most effective methods first — tiered counselling: ENG implant, 52 mg LNG-IUS, Cu-IUD as first-line; combined oral contraceptive, progestin-only pill, ring, patch as second-tier; barrier and fertility awareness as third-tier. The CHOICE Project demonstrated that when LARC is presented first and barriers removed, the majority of women choose LARC and unintended pregnancy rates fall.[1]
- Address her lived concerns explicitly — bleeding profile: amenorrhoea common with the 52 mg LNG-IUS by 12 months; irregular spotting common with the ENG implant; menses heavier with the Cu-IUD. Insertion pain: anticipatory counselling, NSAIDs 30 to 60 minutes before insertion, paracervical block for nulliparous women.[6][11]
- Document capacity, consent and confidentiality — competent adult (Gillick-style for adolescents in Australia; mature minor in some settings); consent in writing; document the counselling, the chosen method, and the alternative declined.[6]
(b) The three LARC methods and their current approved durations for contraception (3 marks)
One mark per method, with duration named. [3][6]
- ENG implant (Nexplanon — 68 mg etonogestrel in a 4-cm rod) — up to 5 years for contraception per the January 2026 FDA label extension, building on a Pearl Index of 0.0 in years 4 and 5.[6]
- 52 mg LNG-IUS (Mirena) — up to 8 years for contraception per the Mirena Extension Trial (Jensen 2022): 3-year Pearl Index 0.28 (95% CI 0.03 to 1.00) across years 6 to 8, cumulative failure 0.68%. HMB label remains 5 years in many jurisdictions.[3]
- Copper IUD (Cu-IUD, typically 380 mm² copper) — typically 10 years in UK/Australian labelling; some jurisdictions allow longer durations. Also used as emergency contraception if inserted within 5 days of unprotected intercourse.[6]
(c) 52 mg LNG-IUS insertion technique and consent essentials (4 marks)
One mark per technical step, with consent essentials summarised separately. [6]
- Bimanual examination to confirm uterine size, position and version; speculum visualisation of the cervix; tenaculum to the anterior lip of the cervix for traction and to straighten the utero-cervical angle.[6]
- Sound the cavity (typical depth 6 to 9 cm); load the device under sterile no-touch technique; advance to the fundus; deploy the arms by retracting the slider once the tip is at the fundus; trim the strings to approximately 3 cm outside the external os.[6]
- Procedural analgesia — NSAID (ibuprofen 800 mg or naproxen) 30 to 60 minutes before insertion; consider paracervical block with 1% lidocaine or topical anaesthetic cream in nulliparous women.[6]
- Informed consent essentials — counsel on bleeding pattern (spotting is common in the first 3 to 6 months, with amenorrhoea by 12 months in many users); explain perforation risk (~1 to 2 per 1 000), expulsion risk (1 to 5 per 100), failed insertion rate (1 to 5 per 100); explain the lost-strings algorithm; sign written consent and document the alternative declined; arrange the 4 to 6-week string check and explain the user's role in thread self-check.[6]
(d) Lost strings at 6 weeks — next steps (4 marks)
One mark per imaging/risk step, with the management plan. [6][16]
- Confirm the threads are not visible at speculum examination; gently sweep the endocervical canal with a cytobrush or thread retriever — strings occasionally retract into the cavity and become visible again.[6]
- Order a transvaginal pelvic ultrasound to localise the device within the uterine cavity. If the device is in the correct cavity position, do not attempt to retrieve it; document the position; continue the method.[6]
- If the device is not seen in the cavity on transvaginal ultrasound, perform a pelvic X-ray to confirm perforation and migration; CT abdomen and pelvis if X-ray is negative but perforation is still suspected.[6]
- Bridging contraception and consent — advise that the device may not be providing contraception and use a barrier method or short-acting contraceptive in the interval; do not attempt office retrieval without imaging confirmation because forcible attempts risk uterine perforation and trauma. If the device is confirmed outside the cavity, refer for laparoscopic removal.[6][16]
References6ShowHide
- [1]Secura GM, Madden T, McNicholas C, Mullersman J, Buckel CM, Zhao Q, Peipert JF Provision of no-cost, long-acting contraception and teenage pregnancy N Engl J Med, 2014.PMID 25271604
- [3]Jensen JT, Lukkari-Lax E, Schulze A, Wahdan Y, Serrani M, Kroll R Contraceptive efficacy and safety of the 52-mg levonorgestrel intrauterine system for up to 8 years: findings from the Mirena Extension Trial Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2022.PMID 36096186
- [5]Altshuler AL, Gaffield ME, Kiarie JN The WHO's medical eligibility criteria for contraceptive use: 20 years of global guidance Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol, 2015.PMID 26390246
- [6]Curtis KM, Nguyen AT, Tepper NK, Zapata LB, Snyder EM, Hatfield-Timajchy K, Kortsmit K, Cohen MA, Whiteman MK U.S. Selected Practice Recommendations for Contraceptive Use, 2024 MMWR Recomm Rep, 2024.PMID 39106301
- [11]Mohr-Sasson A, Dalal L, Bhalwal A The association between BMI and continuity of etonogestrel (ENG)-releasing implant Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 2024.PMID 38712353
- [16]Dermish AI, Turok DK, Jacobson JC, Flores ME, McFadden M, Burke K Failed IUD insertions in community practice: an under-recognized problem? Contraception, 2013.PMID 22979954