Skip to main content
MedVellum
QuestionsVideosPricing

MedVellum

Fellowship exam preparation across every specialty: source-verified topics, questions in every format, and videos.

Product

  • Specialties
  • Questions
  • Videos
  • Exam tools
  • Pricing

Verification & policy

  • Verified register
  • Editorial policy
  • Privacy
  • Terms

Account

  • Sign in
  • Create account
  • Dashboard
  • Account & billing

© 2026 MedVellum. For education only — not a substitute for clinical judgement.

llms.txtPsychiatry LLM catalogSitemap

O&G SAQsSexual and reproductive health — long-acting reversible contraception

O&G SAQs · Sexual and reproductive health — long-acting reversible contraception

Long-acting reversible contraception — structured SAQ (15 marks)

FRANZCOG-format structured SAQ on LARC counselling, durations of use, IUD insertion technique and the lost threads algorithm. Per-sub-part marking rubric included.

15 marks20 min4 min readVerification in progress

Target exams

FRANZCOGMRCOGABOG
On this page
Study tools

Target exams

FRANZCOGMRCOGABOG
Prompt
You are the on-call gynaecology registrar at a contraception clinic. A 23-year-old nulliparous woman (BMI 31, smoker 5 cigarettes per day, no migraine, regular periods, one episode of heavy menstrual bleeding, history of chlamydia treated 18 months ago) attends for contraception. She is in a stable relationship, completed family planning workup, and wants a method she does not have to think about every day. She has heard the implant causes bleeding and the IUD hurts to insert. (a) State your contraceptive counselling framework and explain why LARC is first-line for her. (4 marks) (b) Name the three LARC methods, with their current approved durations of use for contraception. (3 marks) (c) Outline the insertion technique for the 52 mg LNG-IUS, including informed consent essentials. (4 marks) (d) At the 6-week follow-up she reports no strings felt; speculum confirms the threads are not visible. What is your next step? (4 marks)

How this SAQ is marked

Twelve SAQs, 180 marks, two 2-hour papers — roughly 15 marks and 20 minutes each. Marks come from specifics: named method, duration, dose, contraindication, threshold, time window, the 4 T's of any structured answer. Write in short labelled points, not prose paragraphs. Answer the sub-part you are asked. [6]

Reveal model answer and mark schemeShowHide

(a) Contraceptive counselling framework — why LARC is first-line (4 marks)

One mark per point, with reasoning. [6][1][5]

  • Apply the WHO MEC framework — categories 1 to 4 — to her characteristics: BMI 31 obesity (Category 1 for ENG implant, 52 mg LNG-IUS and Cu-IUD), age under 35 (she is below the smoker 15+ cigarettes/day, age 35+ CHC threshold), no migraine, regular periods and prior treated chlamydia. All three LARC methods are Category 1 to 2 for her; combined hormonal contraception is Category 1 with no other risk factors, but LARC outperforms CHC on typical-use failure rate.[5][6]
  • Lead with the most effective methods first — tiered counselling: ENG implant, 52 mg LNG-IUS, Cu-IUD as first-line; combined oral contraceptive, progestin-only pill, ring, patch as second-tier; barrier and fertility awareness as third-tier. The CHOICE Project demonstrated that when LARC is presented first and barriers removed, the majority of women choose LARC and unintended pregnancy rates fall.[1]
  • Address her lived concerns explicitly — bleeding profile: amenorrhoea common with the 52 mg LNG-IUS by 12 months; irregular spotting common with the ENG implant; menses heavier with the Cu-IUD. Insertion pain: anticipatory counselling, NSAIDs 30 to 60 minutes before insertion, paracervical block for nulliparous women.[6][11]
  • Document capacity, consent and confidentiality — competent adult (Gillick-style for adolescents in Australia; mature minor in some settings); consent in writing; document the counselling, the chosen method, and the alternative declined.[6]

(b) The three LARC methods and their current approved durations for contraception (3 marks)

One mark per method, with duration named. [3][6]

  • ENG implant (Nexplanon — 68 mg etonogestrel in a 4-cm rod) — up to 5 years for contraception per the January 2026 FDA label extension, building on a Pearl Index of 0.0 in years 4 and 5.[6]
  • 52 mg LNG-IUS (Mirena) — up to 8 years for contraception per the Mirena Extension Trial (Jensen 2022): 3-year Pearl Index 0.28 (95% CI 0.03 to 1.00) across years 6 to 8, cumulative failure 0.68%. HMB label remains 5 years in many jurisdictions.[3]
  • Copper IUD (Cu-IUD, typically 380 mm² copper) — typically 10 years in UK/Australian labelling; some jurisdictions allow longer durations. Also used as emergency contraception if inserted within 5 days of unprotected intercourse.[6]

(c) 52 mg LNG-IUS insertion technique and consent essentials (4 marks)

One mark per technical step, with consent essentials summarised separately. [6]

  • Bimanual examination to confirm uterine size, position and version; speculum visualisation of the cervix; tenaculum to the anterior lip of the cervix for traction and to straighten the utero-cervical angle.[6]
  • Sound the cavity (typical depth 6 to 9 cm); load the device under sterile no-touch technique; advance to the fundus; deploy the arms by retracting the slider once the tip is at the fundus; trim the strings to approximately 3 cm outside the external os.[6]
  • Procedural analgesia — NSAID (ibuprofen 800 mg or naproxen) 30 to 60 minutes before insertion; consider paracervical block with 1% lidocaine or topical anaesthetic cream in nulliparous women.[6]
  • Informed consent essentials — counsel on bleeding pattern (spotting is common in the first 3 to 6 months, with amenorrhoea by 12 months in many users); explain perforation risk (~1 to 2 per 1 000), expulsion risk (1 to 5 per 100), failed insertion rate (1 to 5 per 100); explain the lost-strings algorithm; sign written consent and document the alternative declined; arrange the 4 to 6-week string check and explain the user's role in thread self-check.[6]

(d) Lost strings at 6 weeks — next steps (4 marks)

One mark per imaging/risk step, with the management plan. [6][16]

  • Confirm the threads are not visible at speculum examination; gently sweep the endocervical canal with a cytobrush or thread retriever — strings occasionally retract into the cavity and become visible again.[6]
  • Order a transvaginal pelvic ultrasound to localise the device within the uterine cavity. If the device is in the correct cavity position, do not attempt to retrieve it; document the position; continue the method.[6]
  • If the device is not seen in the cavity on transvaginal ultrasound, perform a pelvic X-ray to confirm perforation and migration; CT abdomen and pelvis if X-ray is negative but perforation is still suspected.[6]
  • Bridging contraception and consent — advise that the device may not be providing contraception and use a barrier method or short-acting contraceptive in the interval; do not attempt office retrieval without imaging confirmation because forcible attempts risk uterine perforation and trauma. If the device is confirmed outside the cavity, refer for laparoscopic removal.[6][16]
Obstetrics & Gynaecology Pro

Continue reading

You have read the opening of this SAQ. The complete unit — every section and its primary-source references — is part of the Obstetrics & Gynaecology fellowship library.

Sign in to continueSee pricing
References6ShowHide
  1. [1]Secura GM, Madden T, McNicholas C, Mullersman J, Buckel CM, Zhao Q, Peipert JF Provision of no-cost, long-acting contraception and teenage pregnancy N Engl J Med, 2014.PMID 25271604
  2. [3]Jensen JT, Lukkari-Lax E, Schulze A, Wahdan Y, Serrani M, Kroll R Contraceptive efficacy and safety of the 52-mg levonorgestrel intrauterine system for up to 8 years: findings from the Mirena Extension Trial Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2022.PMID 36096186
  3. [5]Altshuler AL, Gaffield ME, Kiarie JN The WHO's medical eligibility criteria for contraceptive use: 20 years of global guidance Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol, 2015.PMID 26390246
  4. [6]Curtis KM, Nguyen AT, Tepper NK, Zapata LB, Snyder EM, Hatfield-Timajchy K, Kortsmit K, Cohen MA, Whiteman MK U.S. Selected Practice Recommendations for Contraceptive Use, 2024 MMWR Recomm Rep, 2024.PMID 39106301
  5. [11]Mohr-Sasson A, Dalal L, Bhalwal A The association between BMI and continuity of etonogestrel (ENG)-releasing implant Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 2024.PMID 38712353
  6. [16]Dermish AI, Turok DK, Jacobson JC, Flores ME, McFadden M, Burke K Failed IUD insertions in community practice: an under-recognized problem? Contraception, 2013.PMID 22979954
Obstetrics & Gynaecology Pro

$29/ monthor $279 / year

The complete Obstetrics & Gynaecology library, every exam format, one subscription.

  • Complete library for one chosen specialty
  • Timed MCQ mock exams and spaced review
  • Clinical cases & cross-table vivas
See pricingSign in
PreviousLate intrauterine fetal death — structured SAQ (15 marks)Antenatal care — fetal loss and bereavementNextMandatory notification, professional boundaries and indemnity — structured SAQ (15 marks)Professional practice — professionalism, ethics and regulation