O&G SAQs · Gynaecological oncology — cancer in pregnancy
Gynaecological cancer in pregnancy — structured SAQ (15 marks)
FRANZCOG-format structured SAQ on gynaecological cancer in pregnancy: the imaging approach (non-contrast MRI first-line, do not withhold CT or PET, no abdominal shielding), the three cervical cancer management paths (terminate, bridge with neoadjuvant platinum, or caesarean-radical-hysterectomy at term), the 14-week and 35-week chemotherapy windows with four contraindicated agents, the delivery recommendations, the placenta to pathology, and the reassuring long-term neurodevelopmental data. Per-sub-part marking rubric included.
On this page
Study tools
Target exams
How this SAQ is marked
Marks come from the imaging approach with the shielding position, the three cervical cancer management paths with the determining factors, the chemotherapy windows with their rationale and four contraindicated agents, the delivery recommendations and the placenta, and the long-term neurodevelopmental outcome. Write in short labelled points. [1]
Reveal model answer and mark schemeShowHide
(a) Imaging approach (3 marks)
One mark for the first-line modality, one for CT and PET, one for the shielding position. [1][2]
- Non-contrast MRI is the first-line cross-sectional modality for local staging of cervical cancer in pregnancy — no ionising radiation, good for tumour size, parametrial invasion and nodal assessment. Gadolinium is avoided unless essential as it crosses the placenta.
- CT, gadolinium-enhanced MRI and PET-CT should not be withheld when clinically indicated — the diagnostic information outweighs the fetal dose at staged doses. A whole-body staging CT delivers well below the threshold for deterministic fetal harm.
- Abdominal shielding is no longer recommended during diagnostic CT in pregnancy (LeJeune 2025) — it increases scatter dose internally and degrades image quality. Remove the lead, get the scan.[1][2]
(b) The three cervical cancer management paths (4 marks)
One mark per path (3) plus one for the determining factors. [1][5]
- (i) Termination and definitive treatment — the option for early diagnosis where the woman chooses not to continue the pregnancy or the disease is advanced.
- (ii) Neoadjuvant platinum chemotherapy after the first trimester to bridge to delivery, then definitive treatment (chemoradiotherapy or surgery) postpartum — the option for disease diagnosed in the first or early second trimester where the woman wishes to continue.
- (iii) Caesarean-radical-hysterectomy at term — the option for disease diagnosed near term, with definitive chemoradiotherapy deferred to the postpartum period.
- Stage IA1 without LVSI is managed conservatively — definitive surgery after delivery. The determining factors are the FIGO stage, the gestational age at diagnosis, the tumour biology, and the woman's values.[1][5]
(c) Chemotherapy windows and contraindicated agents (4 marks)
One mark for the 14-week window and rationale, one for the 35-week window and rationale, one for the 3-week rule, one for four contraindicated agents. [1][4]
- After 14 weeks — organogenesis is complete, so the teratogenic risk falls to near-background. This is the window for chemotherapy in pregnancy.
- Stopped by 35 weeks — to allow marrow recovery before delivery and avoid a neutropenic or thrombocytopenic neonate. Do not give chemotherapy within 3 weeks of planned delivery.
- Rationale: the windows protect the fetus at organogenesis and at delivery, the two points of maximum vulnerability.[1][4]
- Four contraindicated agents: tamoxifen (teratogenic), trastuzumab (oligohydramnios and fetal renal injury), checkpoint inhibitors (fetomaternal immune-tolerance disruption), bevacizumab (third-trimester wound healing and bleeding).[1]
(d) Delivery recommendations and the placenta (2 marks)
One mark for the delivery recommendations, one for the placenta. [1]
- Caesarean for cervical cancer (especially after conisation or trachelectomy) and for vulvar cancer with a perineal wound; vaginal delivery allowed in most ovarian cancers (Amant 3rd consensus 2019).
- Send the placenta to pathology in every case — placental metastasis, though rare, must be sought and documented.[1]
(e) Long-term neurodevelopmental outcome (2 marks)
One mark for the neurodevelopmental finding, one for the main driver. [3]
- Prenatal chemotherapy exposure is generally reassuring for long-term neurodevelopment — the Korakiti (2020) systematic review found generally normal neurodevelopment in children exposed in utero.
- The main driver of adverse neonatal outcome is iatrogenic preterm birth, not the chemotherapy itself — avoiding unnecessary prematurity is the priority.[3][4]
References5ShowHide
- [1]Amant F, Berveiller P, Boere IA, et al. Gynecologic cancers in pregnancy: guidelines based on a third international consensus meeting. Ann Oncol, 2019.PMID 31435648
- [2]LeJeune CL, Nougaret S, Massera RT, et al. Abdominal shielding not recommended for diagnostic imaging with ionising radiation during pregnancy. Lancet Oncol, 2025.PMID 41167213
- [3]Korakiti AM, Zografos E, van Gerwen M, et al. Long-Term Neurodevelopmental Outcome of Children after in Utero Exposure to Chemotherapy. Cancers (Basel), 2020.PMID 33287323
- [4]Vandenbroucke T, Verheecke M, Fumagalli M, et al. Effects of cancer treatment during pregnancy on fetal and child development. Lancet Child Adolesc Health, 2017.PMID 30169185
- [5]LeJeune CL, Van Calsteren K, Amant F A multidisciplinary management approach to cervical cancer during pregnancy. Lancet, 2026.PMID 41720126