Skip to main content
MedVellum
QuestionsVideosPricing

MedVellum

Fellowship exam preparation across every specialty: source-verified topics, questions in every format, and videos.

Product

  • Specialties
  • Questions
  • Videos
  • Exam tools
  • Pricing

Verification & policy

  • Verified register
  • Editorial policy
  • Privacy
  • Terms

Account

  • Sign in
  • Create account
  • Dashboard
  • Account & billing

© 2026 MedVellum. For education only — not a substitute for clinical judgement.

llms.txtPsychiatry LLM catalogSitemap

O&G SAQsIntrapartum care — fetal surveillance

O&G SAQs · Intrapartum care — fetal surveillance

Fetal surveillance modalities in labour — structured SAQ (15 marks)

FRANZCOG-format structured SAQ contrasting two labouring women: intelligent structured intermittent auscultation with its criteria and technique, the conversion triggers to continuous CTG, escalation to a fetal scalp electrode with prerequisites and contraindications, and counselling about mobility and telemetry. Per-sub-part marking rubric included.

15 marks20 min4 min readVerification in progress

Target exams

FRANZCOGMRCOGABOG
On this page
Study tools

Target exams

FRANZCOGMRCOGABOG
Prompt
You are the registrar covering a tertiary birth suite. (Case A) A healthy 26-year-old G2P1 at 39+4 weeks presents in spontaneous labour, 5 cm dilated, clear liquor, no antenatal or intrapartum risk factors. She asks to stay mobile and to use the birth pool. (Case B) A 38-year-old G3P2 at 40+6 weeks with a body mass index of 45 is being induced for post-dates, is 6 cm dilated on oxytocin with an epidural, and the external CTG has been fragmented with repeated contact loss for the last 25 minutes. Her booking bloods are negative for blood-borne viruses and she is group B streptococcus positive. (a) For Case A, state the monitoring you would recommend, the criteria that make it appropriate, and exactly how it should be performed. (5 marks) (b) For Case A, list the findings that would make you convert her to continuous CTG. (3 marks) (c) For Case B, outline your approach to the inadequate trace, including the modality you would escalate to, its prerequisites and its contraindications. (5 marks) (d) Case B's partner asks why she cannot simply walk around like the woman next door. Outline your answer. (2 marks)

How this SAQ is marked

This question is about selection and technique, not interpretation. Marks come from named criteria, named intervals, named prerequisites and named contraindications. A candidate who writes "I would monitor the baby appropriately" scores nothing. [1][2]

Reveal model answer and mark schemeShowHide

(a) Case A — recommended monitoring, criteria and technique (5 marks)

One mark for the recommendation, one for the criteria, two for the technique, one for the frequency. [1][2]

Recommendation: intermittent auscultation, with a hand-held Doppler or Pinard stethoscope, in the context of one-to-one midwifery care. She may use the birth pool and remain mobile.[1][2]

Criteria that make it appropriate — all must hold: [1][2]

  • No antenatal or intrapartum risk factors.
  • Cephalic presentation with normal fetal growth and liquor volume.
  • Normal uterine activity and normal resting tone.
  • Fetal heart rate 110 to 160 bpm, regular rhythm, no decelerations heard.[1]

Technique: [1][7]

  • Palpate the abdomen first to confirm lie, position, presentation and descent.
  • Palpate the contraction — onset, duration, frequency, strength and resting tone.
  • Auscultate immediately after a contraction so the fetal heart rate response to it is captured.
  • Count for one full minute.
  • Palpate the maternal pulse simultaneously to confirm the rate is fetal.
  • Document as a single number, plus any accelerations, decelerations, irregular rhythm or change from the previous value.[1][7]

Frequency: every 15 to 30 minutes in the active first stage; after every contraction, or at least every 5 minutes, in the active second stage.[1][2]

(b) Case A — triggers to convert to continuous CTG (3 marks)

One mark per group of three correct triggers. [1][2]

  • From auscultation itself: a rate outside 110 to 160 bpm; decelerations heard; an irregular rhythm; a significant change from the previous documented rate.
  • New intrapartum risk factors: oxytocin augmentation, regional analgesia, meconium-stained liquor, maternal pyrexia above 38 degrees Celsius, clinical chorioamnionitis, bleeding in labour, tachysystole or hypertonus, prolonged first or second stage, unstable maternal circulation.
  • Loss of the preconditions: malpresentation identified, suspected growth restriction, or the woman no longer receiving one-to-one care.[1][2]

If the CTG is normal after 20 minutes and the trigger has resolved, returning to intermittent auscultation is reasonable. [1]

(c) Case B — the inadequate trace (5 marks)

One mark for the systematic troubleshooting, one for confirming the signal is fetal, one for naming the escalation, one for prerequisites, one for contraindications. [1][4]

Troubleshoot first: [1][7]

  • Check and monitor the maternal pulse — an inadequate trace and maternal heart rate contamination often travel together.[7]
  • Re-palpate the abdomen and reposition the ultrasound transducer over the fetal back, and reposition the tocodynamometer.
  • Consider wireless or beltless technology if available.
  • Never document an unreadable trace as normal — an uninterpretable trace is an abnormal finding, and in a woman on oxytocin it demands a decision.[1]

Escalate to a fetal scalp electrode. Indicated when external monitoring cannot give a continuous trace or when baseline variability cannot be assessed.[1]

Prerequisites: ruptured membranes, adequate cervical dilatation, and relative certainty about the position of the presenting part so the electrode is not placed on a fontanelle, suture, eye, face or genitalia.[1]

Contraindications — the same list as fetal blood sampling: maternal HIV, hepatitis B or hepatitis C; active genital herpes lesions; suspected intrauterine sepsis; known or suspected fetal bleeding disorder or thrombocytopenia. Group B streptococcus colonisation is not a contraindication, so it does not stop you here.[1][5]

Consent and counsel: absolute neonatal risk is low — scalp injury 1.2% versus 0.9% and cephalohaematoma 1.0% versus 0.9% in a large cohort — and the device should be used when clinically indicated.[4]

(d) Case B — explaining why she cannot walk (2 marks)

One mark for an honest explanation of the trade-off, one for offering a solution rather than a refusal. [3][6]

  • Be honest about the reason: "She is on a drip to strengthen contractions and has an epidural, so we recommend watching the baby's heartbeat continuously. Continuous monitoring roughly halves the risk of newborn seizures, but it does not reduce cerebral palsy and it does increase the chance of a caesarean — so it is a genuine trade-off, not a rule."[3]
  • Offer the solution: "The reason she is in bed is the cables, not the monitoring. If we have a wireless monitor available I will get it, and she can stand, kneel or walk. If we do not have one, I will make sure she can change position freely and I will keep reviewing whether she still needs continuous monitoring."[6]
  • Document the discussion and her preference.[1]
Obstetrics & Gynaecology Pro

Continue reading

You have read the opening of this SAQ. The complete unit — every section and its primary-source references — is part of the Obstetrics & Gynaecology fellowship library.

Sign in to continueSee pricing
References7ShowHide
  1. [1]Yeoh M, Ameratunga D, Lee J, et al. Simplifying the language of fetal monitoring Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol, 2019.PMID 30460717
  2. [2]Lewis D, Downe S FIGO consensus guidelines on intrapartum fetal monitoring: Intermittent auscultation Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 2015.PMID 26433400
  3. [3]Alfirevic Z, Devane D, Gyte GM, et al. Continuous cardiotocography (CTG) as a form of electronic fetal monitoring (EFM) for fetal assessment during labour Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2017.PMID 28157275
  4. [4]Kawakita T, Reddy UM, Landy HJ, et al. Neonatal complications associated with use of fetal scalp electrode: a retrospective study BJOG, 2016.PMID 26643181
  5. [5]Maiques V, García-Tejedor A, Perales A, et al. Intrapartum fetal invasive procedures and perinatal transmission of HIV Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 1999.PMID 10579618
  6. [6]Fox D, Maude R, Coddington R, et al. The use of continuous foetal monitoring technologies that enable mobility in labour for women with complex pregnancies: A survey of Australian and New Zealand hospitals Midwifery, 2021.PMID 33260005
  7. [7]Simpson KR Avoiding confusion of maternal heart rate with fetal heart rate during labor MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs, 2011.PMID 21709529
Obstetrics & Gynaecology Pro

$29/ monthor $279 / year

The complete Obstetrics & Gynaecology library, every exam format, one subscription.

  • Complete library for one chosen specialty
  • Timed MCQ mock exams and spaced review
  • Clinical cases & cross-table vivas
See pricingSign in
PreviousFetal blood sampling and scalp lactate — structured SAQ (15 marks)Intrapartum care — fetal surveillanceNextIntrapartum CTG interpretation — structured SAQ (15 marks)Intrapartum care — fetal surveillance