Skip to main content
MedVellum
QuestionsVideosPricing

MedVellum

Fellowship exam preparation across every specialty: source-verified topics, questions in every format, and videos.

Product

  • Specialties
  • Questions
  • Videos
  • Exam tools
  • Pricing

Verification & policy

  • Verified register
  • Editorial policy
  • Privacy
  • Terms

Account

  • Sign in
  • Create account
  • Dashboard
  • Account & billing

© 2026 MedVellum. For education only — not a substitute for clinical judgement.

llms.txtPsychiatry LLM catalogSitemap

O&G SAQsAntenatal care — fetal growth and surveillance

O&G SAQs · Antenatal care — fetal growth and surveillance

Fetal growth restriction and small for gestational age — structured SAQ (15 marks)

FRANZCOG-format structured SAQ on early fetal growth restriction: applying the Gordijn Delphi definition, building a Doppler-centred surveillance plan, defending the delivery timing from TRUFFLE, and managing absent end-diastolic flow. Per-sub-part marking rubric included.

15 marks20 min3 min readVerification in progress

Target exams

FRANZCOGMRCOGABOG
On this page
Study tools

Target exams

FRANZCOGMRCOGABOG
Prompt
You are the registrar in a tertiary fetal medicine unit. A 29-year-old woman (G1P0) at 29 weeks is referred with an estimated fetal weight on the 3rd centile, an abdominal circumference under the 3rd centile, and an umbilical artery pulsatility index above the 95th centile. Her blood pressure is 124/78 mmHg and urine is clear. (a) Classify this finding using the Gordijn Delphi consensus and state the diagnosis. (3 marks) (b) Outline your surveillance plan, naming the modalities and the intervals. (4 marks) (c) Interpret the role of the TRUFFLE trial in determining the timing of delivery in this woman. (4 marks) (d) The umbilical artery Doppler progresses to absent end-diastolic flow at 31 weeks. Outline your management. (4 marks)

How this SAQ is marked

Twelve SAQs, 180 marks, two 2-hour papers — roughly 15 marks and 20 minutes each. Marks come from specifics: the Delphi criteria reproduced exactly, the Doppler interpretation, the trial names with their findings, and the surveillance interval stated as a number of weeks. Write short labelled points. [1]

Reveal model answer and mark schemeShowHide

(a) Classification (3 marks)

One mark for the diagnosis, one for the solitary parameter, one for naming the consensus. [1]

  • This is early fetal growth restriction (under 32 weeks), defined by the Gordijn 2016 Delphi consensus. The EFW and AC under the 3rd centile are solitary parameters — each is sufficient alone to diagnose FGR.[1]
  • The raised UA-PI above the 95th centile is a contributory parameter that further supports the diagnosis and indicates placental insufficiency as the cause.[1]
  • It is not 'small for gestational age' (a size label); it is FGR (a pathology), because the Doppler confirms failed placentation.[1]

(b) Surveillance plan (4 marks)

One mark for naming Doppler as the cornerstone, one for the modalities, one for the interval, one for the principle. [1][4]

  • Umbilical artery Doppler is the surveillance cornerstone, with the Alfirevic Cochrane review confirming it reduces perinatal death (RR 0.71) in high-risk pregnancy — not CTG alone.[4]
  • Modalities: biometry (EFW, AC) every 2 to 4 weeks for growth velocity; umbilical artery Doppler at each visit; cerebroplacental ratio and middle cerebral artery; amniotic fluid volume; and, in early severe FGR, ductus venosus and computerised CTG.[1]
  • Interval: at this Doppler severity (raised PI, EFW under 3rd centile), surveillance at least every 2 weeks, and sooner if there is any change in the Doppler.[1]
  • Principle: a normal Doppler today does not exclude deterioration before the next scan — the interval is part of the prescription.[4]

(c) The role of TRUFFLE in delivery timing (4 marks)

One mark for naming the trial, one for the surveillance sequence, one for the delivery triggers, one for the outcome. [2][3]

  • TRUFFLE (Trial of Randomised Umbilical and Fetal Flow in Europe) is the trial that informs delivery timing in early-onset FGR. It recruited women at 26 to 32 weeks with AC under the 10th centile and UA-PI above the 95th, randomised to delivery triggered by early or late computerised CTG changes, or by abnormal ductus venosus.[2]
  • The surveillance sequence in early FGR is: raised UA-PI, then low CPR (brain-sparing), then abnormal ductus venosus, then abnormal CTG.[2]
  • Delivery is triggered by abnormal ductus venosus waveform or computerised fetal heart rate analysis, balancing gestational age against fetal compromise; if Dopplers remain stable, delivery around 37 weeks.[2]
  • The 2-year neurodevelopmental outcomes were best in the groups delivered for ductus venosus or computerised CTG indicators, supporting the use of these late markers as triggers rather than a short-term CTG alone.[3]

(d) Absent end-diastolic flow at 31 weeks (4 marks)

One mark for the significance, one for admission, one for corticosteroids and neonatology, one for delivery timing. [2]

  • Absent end-diastolic flow is a high-risk finding — it indicates severe placental resistance with a sharply rising risk of stillbirth and fetal acidosis.[2]
  • Admit for inpatient surveillance with regular Doppler (including ductus venosus), computerised CTG, and daily fetal monitoring.[2]
  • Give antenatal corticosteroids for fetal lung maturity (delivery is likely before 34 weeks), and involve neonatology for anticipated preterm and growth-restricted infant care.[2]
  • Delivery timing: plan delivery around 32 to 34 weeks (or earlier if the ductus venosus or computerised CTG become abnormal), usually by caesarean because the growth-restricted fetus tolerates labour poorly. Counsel the woman honestly about the realistic outcomes of early severe FGR.[2][3]
Obstetrics & Gynaecology Pro

Continue reading

You have read the opening of this SAQ. The complete unit — every section and its primary-source references — is part of the Obstetrics & Gynaecology fellowship library.

Sign in to continueSee pricing
References5ShowHide
  1. [1]Gordijn SJ, Beune IM, Thilaganathan B, et al. Consensus definition of fetal growth restriction: a Delphi procedure Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2016.PMID 26909664
  2. [2]Lees C, Marlow N, Arabin B, et al. Perinatal morbidity and mortality in early-onset fetal growth restriction: cohort outcomes of the TRUFFLE trial Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2013.PMID 24078432
  3. [3]Lees CC, Marlow N, Van Wassenaer-Leemhuis A, et al. 2 year neurodevelopmental and intermediate perinatal outcomes in infants with very preterm fetal growth restriction (TRUFFLE) Lancet, 2015.PMID 25747582
  4. [4]Alfirevic Z, Stampalija T, Dowswell T Fetal and umbilical Doppler ultrasound in high-risk pregnancies Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2017.PMID 28613398
  5. [5]Roberge S, Bujold E, Nicolaides KH Aspirin for the prevention of preterm and term preeclampsia: systematic review and metaanalysis Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2018.PMID 29138036
Obstetrics & Gynaecology Pro

$29/ monthor $279 / year

The complete Obstetrics & Gynaecology library, every exam format, one subscription.

  • Complete library for one chosen specialty
  • Timed MCQ mock exams and spaced review
  • Clinical cases & cross-table vivas
See pricingSign in
PreviousIntrapartum CTG interpretation — structured SAQ (15 marks)Intrapartum care — fetal surveillanceNextFetal structural anomalies — structured SAQ (15 marks)Antenatal care — fetal anomaly screening