O&G SAQs · Gynaecological health — menstrual disorders
Endometrial polyps — structured SAQ (15 marks)
FRANZCOG-format structured SAQ on endometrial polyps: the PPP framework, the imaging ladder and accuracy data, the Sasaki malignancy meta-analysis (3.4 percent; risk factors), and the management of postmenopausal bleeding and tamoxifen users. Per-sub-part marking rubric included.
On this page
Study tools
Target exams
How this SAQ is marked
Marks come from the verbatim PPP framework, the imaging accuracy data (SIS sens 0.87 vs TVUS 0.62 vs hysteroscopy 0.92), the Sasaki malignancy rate (3.4 percent) and its risk factors, and the management ladder with the threshold for histology. Write in short labelled points. [1]
Reveal model answer and mark schemeShowHide
(a) Classification and the PPP framework (3 marks)
One mark per point, maximum three. [1][6]
- Endometrial polyps are the P of FIGO PALM-COEIN — a structural cause (AUB-P).
- PPP framework — triage a focal intracavitary lesion as:
- P — Polyp: the default focal lesion; manage by hysteroscopic polypectomy with histology.
- P — Pregnancy: exclude pregnancy first — a gestational sac, retained products or trophoblastic disease can mimic a polyp.
- P — Pathology: endometrial hyperplasia or carcinoma — especially in the older, postmenopausal or risk-factor-laden woman; every resected polyp goes for histology.[1][6]
(b) Imaging ladder and accuracy (4 marks)
One mark per point. [2]
- Transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS) first-line: assesses the endometrial echo and focal lesions; sensitivity about 0.62, specificity about 0.73.
- Saline-infusion sonohysterography (SIS): for cavity lesions; sensitivity about 0.87, specificity about 0.86.
- Hysteroscopy with directed biopsy: the gold standard, also treats; sensitivity about 0.92, specificity about 0.85.
- Rank: hysteroscopy greater than SIS greater than TVUS. SIS is the cost-accuracy sweet spot; hysteroscopy both confirms and treats.[2]
(c) Malignancy rates and risk factors (4 marks)
One mark per point, maximum four. [3][4]
- Pooled prevalence of premalignant/malignant lesions in clinically-recognised polyps is 3.4 percent (Sasaki 2018 meta-analysis of 21,057 polyps).
- Independent risk factors: abnormal uterine bleeding, menopausal status, age over 60 years, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, obesity, tamoxifen use.
- Atypical hyperplastic polyp carries a pooled concurrent endometrial cancer risk of 5.6 percent (de Rijk 2016).
- Three of every 100 women with clinically-recognised polyps will harbour premalignant or malignant lesions — the rate drives investigation in older and risk-factor-laden women.[3][4]
(d) Management and tamoxifen (4 marks)
One mark per point, maximum four. [5][6]
- This 58-year-old: postmenopausal bleeding with a polyp is a red flag — hysteroscopy with directed polypectomy and histology; malignancy exclusion is the priority.
- Threshold for histology: every resected polyp goes for histology; particular vigilance for postmenopausal women, older women with risk factors, and any polyp with atypia.
- Tamoxifen user: excise symptomatic polyps for histology; surveillance with TVUS/SIS for asymptomatic users; LNG-IUS reduces polyp formation (OR about 0.22) and hyperplasia (OR about 0.13).
- Conservative management is reserved for small asymptomatic polyps under 10 mm in women without malignancy risk factors — up to 25 percent regress.[5][6]
References6ShowHide
- [1]Munro MG, Critchley HO, Broder MS, et al. FIGO classification system (PALM-COEIN) for causes of abnormal uterine bleeding in nongravid women of reproductive age. Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 2011.PMID 21345435
- [2]Kaveh M, Sadegi K, Salarzaei M, Parooei F Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of saline infusion sonohysterography, transvaginal sonography, and hysteroscopy in evaluating the endometrial polyps in women with abnormal uterine bleeding: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne, 2020.PMID 32904526
- [3]Sasaki LMP, Andrade KRC, Figueiredo ACMG, Wanderley MDS, Pereira MG Factors Associated with Malignancy in Hysteroscopically Resected Endometrial Polyps: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 2018.PMID 29454147
- [4]de Rijk SR, Steenbergen ME, Nieboer TE, Coppus SF Atypical Endometrial Polyps and Concurrent Endometrial Cancer: A Systematic Review. Obstet Gynecol, 2016.PMID 27500332
- [5]Shi Q, Li J, Li M, Wu J, Yao Q, Xing A The role of levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system for endometrial protection in women with breast cancer taking tamoxifen. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol, 2014.PMID 25423691
- [6]American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists AAGL practice report: practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of endometrial polyps. J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 2012.PMID 22196255