O&G SAQs · Early pregnancy care
Ectopic pregnancy — single-dose methotrexate and the surgical choice (structured SAQ, 15 marks)
FRANZCOG-format structured SAQ on a confirmed unruptured tubal ectopic in a woman with a single remaining tube: the ultrasound diagnostic ladder, why an hCG never locates a pregnancy, methotrexate selection and the predictors of failure, the single-dose protocol with day 4 and day 7 monitoring, anti-D and counselling. Includes the per-sub-part mark scheme, common errors and examiner notes.
On this page
Study tools
Target exams
How this SAQ is marked
Twelve SAQs across two 2-hour papers, 180 marks — roughly 15 marks and 20 minutes each. Marks come from named thresholds and named actions, not from paragraphs. Write short labelled points and answer the sub-part you were asked. [1]
Reveal model answer and mark schemeShowHide
(a) Diagnosis, certainty and why the hCG cannot decide it (4 marks)
One mark for the diagnosis, one for the certainty level with justification, two for the hCG reasoning. [1]
- Diagnosis: a left tubal ectopic pregnancy, unruptured, with the woman currently haemodynamically stable.[1]
- Certainty: high probability. An adnexal mass moving separately from the ovary with an empty gestational sac — the tubal ring or bagel sign — is a high-probability feature; it becomes diagnostic when a yolk sac, fetal pole or heartbeat is seen within it.[1]
- No single hCG level locates a pregnancy. The hCG describes trophoblastic activity, not site. The discriminatory zone is a concept, not a rule: among pregnancies of unknown location with an hCG above 3000 IU/L, 39 of 358 women (about 11%) still had a viable intrauterine pregnancy.[3]
- The diagnosis here was made by the ultrasound features, which is why treatment can proceed without further hCG sampling.
A candidate who writes "hCG above the discriminatory zone, therefore ectopic" loses the certainty mark and the reasoning mark, regardless of the eventual diagnosis. [3]
(b) Management options and selection (5 marks)
One mark for naming the options, one for the medical-versus-surgical reasoning, one for naming the dominant predictor of failure, one for the contraindications, one for an explicit plan. [1][2]
- Options: methotrexate (single-dose), laparoscopic salpingotomy, laparoscopic salpingectomy, or — not appropriate here — expectant management.[1]
- Selection for this woman: single-dose methotrexate is appropriate because she is stable and unruptured, the mass is 2.6 cm, the hCG is moderate, and she has no stated contraindications. Because she has a single remaining tube, a tube-sparing approach is favoured where it is safe.[1][2]
- Dominant predictor of methotrexate failure is a high presenting hCG, followed by fetal cardiac activity and larger mass size; in the Lipscomb series successfully treated women averaged 4019 mIU per millilitre against 13 420 in failures.[5][4]
- Contraindications to exclude before methotrexate: renal or hepatic impairment, cytopenia, active peptic ulcer, pulmonary disease, breastfeeding, and inability to attend follow-up.[1]
- Plan: baseline bloods including renal and liver function and full blood count, confirm no contraindication, consent including cytotoxic precautions, administer methotrexate, and book the day 4 and day 7 hCG.[1]
If she were unstable, had a very high hCG with cardiac activity, or declined follow-up, the answer would be laparoscopic salpingotomy (tube-sparing) or salpingectomy. [1][6]
(c) The single-dose methotrexate protocol (4 marks)
One mark for the dose, one for the monitoring schedule, one for the day 4 to day 7 response rule, one for the failure action. [1][4]
- Dose: methotrexate 50 mg per metre squared by intramuscular injection, calculated from body surface area. Day of injection is day 1.[4][8]
- Monitoring: serum hCG on days 1, 4 and 7, then weekly until the hCG is negative.[1][8]
- Response rule: a fall of 15% or more between day 4 and day 7 indicates adequate response; continue weekly hCG to negative.[1][7][8]
- Failure action: a fall of less than 15% between day 4 and day 7 requires clinical reassessment and usually a second dose, with a further hCG on day 7 after the second dose. Conversion to surgery is for methotrexate failure after repeat dosing, a rising hCG, new pain, or instability.[1][8]
A transient rise between day 1 and day 4 is common and does not indicate failure — the decision point is day 4 to day 7. [1][4]
(d) Anti-D and counselling (2 marks)
One mark each. [1]
- Anti-D: she is RhD negative with a sensitising event; give anti-D after any surgical management and follow your local policy for medical management — noting that guideline positions differ by jurisdiction and the 2025 French guideline makes no ectopic-specific recommendation.[1][10]
- Counselling: cytotoxic precautions and contraception with delaying attempts to conceive for 3 months — the guideline washout period, while the manufacturer advises 6 months — the symptoms to report (mouth ulcers, sore throat, dry cough, chest or abdominal pain, new or worsening pain), the mandatory follow-up to a negative hCG, and the written information and 24-hour contact number with explicit return criteria. Acknowledge the emotional impact and offer support.[1][7][9]
References10ShowHide
- [1]Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists Diagnosis and Management of Ectopic Pregnancy: Green-top Guideline No. 21 BJOG, 2016.PMID 27813249
- [2]American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists' Committee on Practice Bulletins—Gynecology ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 193: Tubal Ectopic Pregnancy Obstet Gynecol, 2018.PMID 29470343
- [3]Bobdiwala S, Kyriacou C, Christodoulou E, et al. Evaluating cut-off levels for progesterone, β human chorionic gonadotropin and β human chorionic gonadotropin ratio to exclude pregnancy viability in women with a pregnancy of unknown location: A prospective multicenter cohort study Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, 2022.PMID 34817062
- [4]Lipscomb GH, Bran D, McCord ML, et al. Analysis of three hundred fifteen ectopic pregnancies treated with single-dose methotrexate Am J Obstet Gynecol, 1998.PMID 9662322
- [5]Lipscomb GH, McCord ML, Stovall TG, et al. Predictors of success of methotrexate treatment in women with tubal ectopic pregnancies N Engl J Med, 1999.PMID 10607814
- [6]Mol F, van Mello NM, Strandell A, et al. Salpingotomy versus salpingectomy in women with tubal pregnancy (ESEP study): an open-label, multicentre, randomised controlled trial Lancet, 2014.PMID 24499812
- [7]Po L, Thomas J, Mills K, et al. Guideline No. 414: Management of Pregnancy of Unknown Location and Tubal and Nontubal Ectopic Pregnancies. J Obstet Gynaecol Can, 2021.PMID 33453378
- [8]Davenport MJ, Lindquist A, Brownfoot F, et al. Time to resolution of tubal ectopic pregnancy following methotrexate treatment: A retrospective cohort study. PLoS One, 2022.PMID 35609041
- [9]Rosh B, Hadad J, Gronich N Timing of conception after methotrexate and subsequent pregnancy outcomes: A retrospective cohort study. Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 2026.PMID 41808516
- [10]Maurice P, Vigoureux S, Garabedian C, et al. Prevention of RhD alloimmunization in the first trimester of pregnancy: Clinical practice guidelines of the French College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 2025.PMID 40251923