Skip to main content
MedVellum
QuestionsVideosPricing

MedVellum

Fellowship exam preparation across every specialty: source-verified topics, questions in every format, and videos.

Product

  • Specialties
  • Questions
  • Videos
  • Exam tools
  • Pricing

Verification & policy

  • Verified register
  • Editorial policy
  • Privacy
  • Terms

Account

  • Sign in
  • Create account
  • Dashboard
  • Account & billing

© 2026 MedVellum. For education only — not a substitute for clinical judgement.

llms.txtPsychiatry LLM catalogSitemap

O&G SAQsPerioperative care — medico-legal

O&G SAQs · Perioperative care — medico-legal

Consent and provision of information — structured SAQ (15 marks)

FRANZCOG SAQ on RANZCOG C-Gen 2: capacity, voluntariness, adequate information, Rogers v Whitaker, communication support, documentation and withdrawal of consent.

15 marks20 min2 min readVerification in progress

Target exams

FRANZCOGMRCOGABOG
On this page
Study tools

Target exams

FRANZCOGMRCOGABOG
Prompt
A 38-year-old woman with symptomatic fibroids is booked for laparoscopic hysterectomy. At the pre-admission clinic she speaks limited English and her partner answers most questions. She says she is worried about loss of fertility, but the consent form lists only bleeding and infection. On the morning of surgery she says she is unsure and asks whether the operation can be postponed. (a) Describe the three elements of valid consent and apply them to this patient (4 marks). (b) Explain the reasonable patient/material-risk standard and list the information you would disclose (4 marks). (c) Describe how you would assess and support understanding, voluntariness and language access (3 marks). (d) Write the essential components of the contemporaneous documentation and immediate plan (4 marks).

Stem

A 38-year-old woman with symptomatic fibroids uteri is booked for laparoscopic hysterectomy. At the pre-admission clinic she speaks limited English and her partner answers most questions. She says she is worried about loss of fertility, but the consent form lists only bleeding and infection. On the morning of surgery she says she is unsure and asks whether the operation can be postponed. [3]

Obstetrics & Gynaecology Pro

Continue reading

You have read the opening of this SAQ. The complete unit — every section and its primary-source references — is part of the Obstetrics & Gynaecology fellowship library.

Sign in to continueSee pricing
References4ShowHide
  1. [1]High Court of Australia Rogers v Whitaker (1992) 175 CLR 479 High Court of Australia, 1992.Source
  2. [3]Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists Consent and provision of information (C-Gen 2) RANZCOG, 2024.Source
  3. [5]Medical Board of Australia Good medical practice: a code of conduct for doctors in Australia AHPRA, 2020.Source
  4. [19]Haynes AB, Weiser TG, Berry WR, et al. A surgical safety checklist to reduce morbidity and mortality in a global population N Engl J Med, 2009.PMID 19144931
Obstetrics & Gynaecology Pro

$29/ monthor $279 / year

The complete Obstetrics & Gynaecology library, every exam format, one subscription.

  • Complete library for one chosen specialty
  • Timed MCQ mock exams and spaced review
  • Clinical cases & cross-table vivas
See pricingSign in
PreviousColposcopy and treatment of CIN/CGIN — structured SAQ (15 marks)Gynaecological oncology — premalignant cervical diseaseNextConsent, capacity and shared decision-making — structured SAQ (15 marks)Professional practice — ethics, consent and communication