Skip to main content
MedVellum
QuestionsVideosPricing

MedVellum

Fellowship exam preparation across every specialty: source-verified topics, questions in every format, and videos.

Product

  • Specialties
  • Questions
  • Videos
  • Exam tools
  • Pricing

Verification & policy

  • Verified register
  • Editorial policy
  • Privacy
  • Terms

Account

  • Sign in
  • Create account
  • Dashboard
  • Account & billing

© 2026 MedVellum. For education only — not a substitute for clinical judgement.

llms.txtPsychiatry LLM catalogSitemap

O&G SAQsAntenatal care — medical disorders in pregnancy

O&G SAQs · Antenatal care — medical disorders in pregnancy

Mechanical valve in pregnancy — structured SAQ (15 marks)

FRANZCOG-format structured SAQ on a mechanical valve in early pregnancy: mWHO classification, the three anticoagulation strategies and their trade-offs, the peripartum plan, and the postpartum haemodynamic surge. Per-sub-part marking rubric included.

15 marks20 min4 min readVerification in progress

Target exams

FRANZCOGMRCOGABOG
On this page
Study tools

Target exams

FRANZCOGMRCOGABOG
Prompt
You are the on-call registrar in a tertiary maternity unit. A 32-year-old G1P0 at 8 weeks gestation with a mechanical mitral valve (St Jude Medical, inserted six years ago for severe rheumatic mitral regurgitation) presents for her booking visit. She is on long-term warfarin 5 mg daily with a recent international normalised ratio of 3.0. She has read online that warfarin causes birth defects and asks whether she should stop it. Her blood pressure is 118/72 mmHg, she is in sinus rhythm, her echo shows normal left ventricular function and a well-functioning mechanical valve with no transvalvular gradient. (a) State the modified WHO risk class of this pregnancy and explain why. (3 marks) (b) Counsel the woman on the three anticoagulation strategies, including their trade-offs in maternal and fetal outcomes. (5 marks) (c) Outline the peripartum management plan, including the mode and timing of delivery, the anaesthetic considerations, and the postpartum anticoagulation strategy. (5 marks) (d) Describe the contraception counselling and the long-term follow-up plan. (2 marks)

How this SAQ is marked

The marks in a mechanical-valve question sit in four places: the mWHO class stated with the reasoning, the three anticoagulation strategies presented with their trade-offs, the peripartum plan with the postpartum haemodynamic surge addressed, and the contraception and follow-up plan. [1][2]

Reveal model answer and mark schemeShowHide

(a) Modified WHO risk class and reasoning (3 marks)

One mark for the class, one for the reasoning, one for the management implication. [1]

  • Modified WHO class III. A mechanical valve in pregnancy is significantly increased risk of maternal mortality or severe morbidity, requiring expert counselling and cardio-obstetric care throughout.[1]
  • Reasoning: the mechanical valve carries a high maternal thrombosis risk in the hypercoagulable state of pregnancy, and anticoagulation is mandatory but each option creates a trade-off between maternal thrombosis and fetal harm. The ROPAC registry data confirm this risk profile.[2]
  • Management implication: she needs care at a centre with a cardio-obstetric team, planned delivery at a tertiary centre, and high-dependency or intensive care monitoring postpartum. The postpartum haemodynamic surge is the highest-risk window.[1]

(b) The three anticoagulation strategies and their trade-offs (5 marks)

One mark for each strategy named, one mark for each trade-off stated, and one mark for the explicit shared decision-making statement. [1][2]

  • Strategy 1 — warfarin throughout with switch close to delivery. Continue warfarin until 36 weeks, then switch to low-molecular-weight heparin, and then intravenous unfractionated heparin close to delivery. Lowest maternal thrombosis risk; highest fetal embryopathy risk (warfarin in weeks 6 to 12 causes fetal warfarin syndrome, fetal loss, and intracranial haemorrhage).[1]
  • Strategy 2 — low-molecular-weight heparin throughout with anti-Xa monitoring. Twice-daily low-molecular-weight heparin with peak anti-Xa 0.8 to 1.2 units per millilitre, dose-adjusted to maintain therapeutic range. Lowest fetal risk (LMWH does not cross the placenta); higher maternal thrombosis risk when anti-Xa targets are not met, especially if doses are missed.[1][2]
  • Strategy 3 — hybrid: low-molecular-weight heparin in weeks 6 to 12, then warfarin. Use LMWH during the embryopathy window, then switch to warfarin for the second and third trimester. Balances both risks; intermediate overall.[1]
  • The trade-off must be stated explicitly: warfarin throughout has the lowest maternal valve thrombosis rate but the highest fetal loss and embryopathy rate; LMWH throughout has the lowest fetal risk but a higher maternal thrombosis rate when anti-Xa targets are not met. The ROPAC registry (van Hagen 2015) and the recent update (van der Zande 2026) confirm these trade-offs.[2][3]
  • Shared decision-making: present all three strategies with their trade-offs, document the woman's informed choice, and provide written information. The 2018 ESC Guidelines recommend this approach.[1]

(c) Peripartum management plan (5 marks)

One mark each for the mode of delivery, the timing, the anaesthetic plan, the anticoagulation transition, and the postpartum surveillance. [1][6]

  • Mode of delivery: vaginal delivery is preferred unless there is an obstetric indication for caesarean. A short second stage with assisted delivery (forceps or ventouse) reduces the cardiac output spike of pushing and the risk of valve-related complications.[1]
  • Timing: planned delivery around 39 weeks for an uncomplicated mechanical valve, individualised if complications arise. Induction of labour is the typical approach.[1]
  • Anaesthetic plan: early neuraxial analgesia with a slow epidural top-up or low-dose combined spinal-epidural is preferred for labour. Coordinate the timing with the last anticoagulant dose — neuraxial insertion requires a defined interval after the last LMWH dose (usually 24 hours) or after stopping the unfractionated heparin infusion (usually 4 to 6 hours) to minimise the risk of epidural haematoma. General anaesthesia for caesarean if neuraxial is contraindicated.[1][5]
  • Anticoagulation transition: if she is on warfarin until 36 weeks, switch to LMWH at 36 weeks, then intravenous unfractionated heparin at the onset of labour or 4 to 6 hours before a planned caesarean. Stop the unfractionated heparin infusion 4 to 6 hours before the anticipated time of neuraxial insertion. Restart unfractionated heparin 4 to 6 hours after delivery, then transition back to LMWH, then warfarin from day 2 to 5 postpartum.[1]
  • Postpartum surveillance: high-dependency or intensive care monitoring for 24 to 48 hours postpartum, because the postpartum haemodynamic surge is the highest-risk window for cardiac decompensation. Bridge from heparin back to warfarin postpartum, with continued warfarin for at least 6 weeks postpartum given the high thrombosis risk of the puerperium.[1]

(d) Contraception and long-term follow-up (2 marks)

One mark each for contraception and follow-up. [1]

  • Contraception counselling: offer reliable contraception before discharge. The progesterone-only options (progesterone-only pill, depo medroxyprogesterone, etonogestrel implant, levonorgestrel intrauterine system) are usually preferred for cardiac disease. Combined oestrogen-progestogen methods are contraindicated in mechanical valves because of the increased thrombosis risk.[1]
  • Long-term follow-up: structured cardiology follow-up including preconception counselling for the next pregnancy. Review of the valve function at intervals, and consider the option of valve replacement to a tissue valve (which does not require anticoagulation but has a shorter lifespan) if she is planning more pregnancies.[1][4]
Obstetrics & Gynaecology Pro

Continue reading

You have read the opening of this SAQ. The complete unit — every section and its primary-source references — is part of the Obstetrics & Gynaecology fellowship library.

Sign in to continueSee pricing
References6ShowHide
  1. [1]Regitz-Zagrosek V, Roos-Hesselink JW, Bauersachs J, et al. 2018 ESC Guidelines for the management of cardiovascular diseases during pregnancy Eur Heart J, 2018.PMID 30165544
  2. [2]van Hagen IM, Roos-Hesselink JW, Ruys TP, et al. Pregnancy in Women With a Mechanical Heart Valve: Data of the European Society of Cardiology Registry of Pregnancy and Cardiac Disease (ROPAC) Circulation, 2015.PMID 26100109
  3. [3]van der Zande JA, Ramlakhan KP, Sliwa K, et al. Pregnancy with a prosthetic heart valve, thrombosis, and bleeding: the ESC EORP Registry of Pregnancy and Cardiac Disease Eur Heart J, 2026.PMID 40237423
  4. [4]Silversides CK, Grewal J, Mason J, et al. Pregnancy Outcomes in Women With Heart Disease: The CARPREG II Study J Am Coll Cardiol, 2018.PMID 29793631
  5. [5]Moussa HN, Rajapreyar I ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 212: Pregnancy and Heart Disease Obstet Gynecol, 2019.PMID 31568352
  6. [6]Mehta LS, Warnes CA, Bradley E, et al. Cardiovascular Considerations in Caring for Pregnant Patients: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association Circulation, 2020.PMID 32362133
Obstetrics & Gynaecology Pro

$29/ monthor $279 / year

The complete Obstetrics & Gynaecology library, every exam format, one subscription.

  • Complete library for one chosen specialty
  • Timed MCQ mock exams and spaced review
  • Clinical cases & cross-table vivas
See pricingSign in
PreviousMandatory notification, professional boundaries and indemnity — structured SAQ (15 marks)Professional practice — professionalism, ethics and regulationNextSuspected pulmonary embolism in late pregnancy — structured SAQ (15 marks)Antenatal care — medical disorders in pregnancy