O&G SAQs · Intrapartum care — operative birth
Caesarean urgency and timing at term — structured SAQ (15 marks)
FRANZCOG-format structured SAQ on caesarean urgency categorisation and timing at term: category 1 recognition and the first five minutes, the decision-to-delivery interval audit and its evidence, counselling a request for birth before 39 weeks with the gestation-specific numbers, and corticosteroids before a term caesarean. Per-sub-part marking rubric included.
On this page
Study tools
Target exams
How this SAQ is marked
Twelve SAQs, 180 marks, two 2-hour papers — roughly 15 marks and 20 minutes each. This one rewards specifics with sources: the category wording, the two national positions on time standards, and the neonatal numbers by week. Write labelled points, not paragraphs, and answer the sub-part you were asked. [1]
Reveal model answer and mark schemeShowHide
(a) Urgency category, justification and the first five minutes (5 marks)
One mark for the category with its clinical definition; up to four for the actions, with reasoning. [1]
- Category 1 — immediate threat to the life of the woman or fetus. A prolonged bradycardia unresponsive to intrauterine resuscitation in a woman with a uterine scar also raises suspected uterine rupture, which is itself a category 1 indication.[1]
- Declare it out loud with the reason and the destination: "Category 1 for prolonged bradycardia in a woman with a previous caesarean, we are going to theatre now." Pull the obstetric emergency call so obstetrics, anaesthetics, theatre, the coordinator and the neonatal team move at once.[1]
- Continue intrauterine resuscitation while transferring: oxytocin already stopped, full left lateral or manual uterine displacement, rapid intravenous fluid, consider acute tocolysis for hyperstimulation, oxygen only if she is hypoxic.[3]
- Work in parallel, not in series: anaesthetic assessment during transfer, catheter and skin preparation on the table, verbal consent given while moving and documented afterwards, an abbreviated but not abandoned surgical safety check.[1]
- Reassess before the knife and say the result aloud. If the heart rate has recovered fully, the category may be downgraded — a senior decision, made with the anaesthetist present. If rupture is confirmed, warn the team about haemorrhage and call for blood.[1][8]
Marks are lost for reciting the classification without ever declaring it, and for a serial list (transfer, then assess, then consent) rather than parallel action. [1]
(b) The decision-to-delivery interval audit (4 marks)
One mark for what is measured, one for each national position, one for the evidence. [1][2]
- What is measured: the time from the responsible clinician's decision to operate until birth, audited against the category assigned before the birth, using the information available at the moment of decision — never against the condition of the baby at birth, and never against how long it took to find a free theatre.[1]
- ANZ position (RANZCOG C-Obs 14, current July 2019): four categories with no specific time interval attached to any of them; individualised assessment in every case; units must achieve the shortest interval their clinical capability allows; judicial opinion supporting a 30-minute optimal interval is acknowledged as resting on custom rather than strong outcome evidence.[1]
- UK position (NICE): the same four categories, audited against 30 minutes for category 1 and 75 minutes for category 2, framed as audit standards rather than clinical deadlines.[2]
- What the evidence shows: in the national survey of 17 780 emergency caesareans, outcomes for intervals of 16 to 75 minutes were no different from birth within 15 minutes; beyond 75 minutes the odds of a five-minute Apgar below 7 rose (odds ratio 1.7, 95% CI 1.2 to 2.4). Pooled data show 79% of category 1 and 36% of category 2 achieve 30 minutes, and within category 1 the interval was not associated with Apgar, cord pH or nursery admission.[2][3]
(c) Counselling a request for birth at 38 weeks (4 marks)
One mark for the recommendation with its grade; two for the numbers; one for the balanced trade-off and documentation. [4][5]
- State the recommendation: RANZCOG C-Obs 23 (current November 2022) advises planned caesarean at 39 weeks gestation or later in women without additional risks, as an evidence-based recommendation grade B.[5]
- Give the neonatal numbers by week. Compared with intended vaginal birth, respiratory morbidity odds after elective caesarean are 3.9 at 37 weeks, 3.0 at 38 weeks and 1.9 at 39 weeks; serious respiratory morbidity rises about fivefold at 37 weeks. Against birth at 39 weeks, the adjusted odds of the neonatal composite are 1.5 at 38 weeks and 2.1 at 37 weeks.[4][5]
- Give the counter-arguments honestly: about one in ten women booked at 39 weeks will labour before the date and need an unplanned caesarean instead; and the background stillbirth risk between 38+0 and 38+6 is around 3 per 10 000. Earlier birth does not reduce maternal morbidity.[5]
- Add her own risk context: with two previous caesareans, this operation carries a higher chance of adhesions, surgical injury, transfusion and abnormal placentation in any future pregnancy, so the plan should also cover contraception and family completion.[8]
- Close the consultation properly: offer a decision aid, agree a date, and if any date before 39+0 is agreed, document the specific reason in the notes as C-Obs 23 requires.[5]
(d) Reducing neonatal respiratory morbidity when birth before 39 weeks is unavoidable (2 marks)
- Offer antenatal corticosteroids and name the regimen with its trial. In the ASTECS pragmatic randomised trial of 998 women, two intramuscular doses of betamethasone 12 mg in the 48 hours before birth reduced admission with respiratory distress from 5.1% to 2.4% (relative risk 0.46, 95% CI 0.23 to 0.93).[6]
- Attach the caveat, because it is the second mark. The Cochrane review of four trials found reductions in respiratory distress syndrome (relative risk 0.48) and transient tachypnoea (0.43) but graded the evidence low quality; RANZCOG C-Obs 23 accordingly says steroids could be considered where birth before 39 weeks cannot safely be deferred, rather than recommending them routinely.[7][5]
References8ShowHide
- [1]Lucas DN, Yentis SM, Kinsella SM, et al. Urgency of caesarean section: a new classification. J R Soc Med, 2000.PMID 10928020
- [2]Thomas J, Paranjothy S, James D National cross sectional survey to determine whether the decision to delivery interval is critical in emergency caesarean section. BMJ, 2004.PMID 15023829
- [3]Tolcher MC, Johnson RL, El-Nashar SA, et al. Decision-to-incision time and neonatal outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol, 2014.PMID 24499762
- [4]Hansen AK, Wisborg K, Uldbjerg N, et al. Risk of respiratory morbidity in term infants delivered by elective caesarean section: cohort study. BMJ, 2008.PMID 18077440
- [5]Tita AT, Landon MB, Spong CY, et al. Timing of elective repeat cesarean delivery at term and neonatal outcomes. N Engl J Med, 2009.PMID 19129525
- [6]Stutchfield P, Whitaker R, Russell I; Antenatal Steroids for Term Elective Caesarean Section (ASTECS) Research Team Antenatal betamethasone and incidence of neonatal respiratory distress after elective caesarean section: pragmatic randomised trial. BMJ, 2005.PMID 16115831
- [7]Sotiriadis A, Makrydimas G, Papatheodorou S, et al. Corticosteroids for preventing neonatal respiratory morbidity after elective caesarean section at term. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2018.PMID 30075059
- [8]Silver RM, Landon MB, Rouse DJ, et al. Maternal morbidity associated with multiple repeat cesarean deliveries. Obstet Gynecol, 2006.PMID 16738145