O&G SAQs · Gynaecological health — menstrual disorders
Adenomyosis — structured SAQ (15 marks)
FRANZCOG-format structured SAQ on adenomyosis: definition and classification, the MUSA TVS features and the 12 mm MRI junctional-zone threshold, the differential against fibroids and endometriosis, and the medical-to-surgical management ladder. Per-sub-part marking rubric included.
On this page
Study tools
Target exams
FRANZCOGMRCOGABOG
Prompt
A 43-year-old multiparous woman presents with a two-year history of progressively heavier, more painful periods and deep dyspareunia. Bimanual examination reveals a tender, boggy, globally enlarged uterus. (a) Define adenomyosis and state its place in the FIGO PALM-COEIN classification. (2 marks) (b) Describe the MUSA-consensus transvaginal ultrasound features and the MRI threshold for the diagnosis. (5 marks) (c) Distinguish adenomyosis from uterine fibroids and endometriosis on clinical and imaging grounds. (3 marks) (d) Outline the stepwise management, defending your first-line choice and the definitive endpoint. (5 marks)
How this SAQ is marked
Marks come from the verbatim definition, the MUSA TVS features and the 12 mm JZ MRI threshold, the structured differential against fibroids and endometriosis, and the medical-to-surgical management ladder with the LNG-IUS as first-line. Write in short labelled points. [1]
Reveal model answer and mark schemeShowHide
(a) Definition and classification (2 marks)
One mark per point. [1]
- Definition: adenomyosis is the presence of endometrial glands and stroma within the myometrium with adjacent smooth-muscle hyperplasia.
- Classification: it is the A of FIGO PALM-COEIN — a structural cause of abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB-A).[1]
(b) Imaging features and MRI threshold (5 marks)
One mark per point, maximum five. [2][3][4]
- MUSA-consensus TVUS features (named):
- Indirect: globular enlarged uterus, asymmetrical myometrial thickening (posterior wall classically thicker), fan-shaped shadowing.
- Direct: myometrial cysts, hypoechogenic islands, linear striations, irregular endomyometrial junction.
- Diagnostic accuracy: TVUS pooled sensitivity about 72 percent and specificity about 81 percent; MRI about 77 percent and 89 percent (Champaneria).
- MRI threshold: junctional-zone thickness of at least 12 mm on T2-weighted MRI (Reinhold); the mean JZ in adenomyosis is about 15 mm versus 8 mm without.
- Biopsy does not diagnose adenomyosis; it excludes coexisting malignancy. Histology of a hysterectomy specimen is the historical gold standard, no longer required.[2][4]
(c) Differential against fibroids and endometriosis (3 marks)
- Adenomyosis vs fibroids: adenomyosis gives a tender boggy uterus with dysmenorrhoea; fibroids give a firm irregular uterus with discrete masses (FIGO location, not size, predicts bleeding).
- Adenomyosis vs endometriosis: endometriosis is endometrial tissue OUTSIDE the uterus — dyschezia, dysuria, nodularity; coexistence is common.
- Coexistence trap: all three frequently coexist; finish the PALM-COEIN workup and quantify the burden of each before operating.[1][2]
(d) Stepwise management (5 marks)
One mark per point, maximum five. [5][6]
- First-line: the levonorgestrel intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) — improves dysmenorrhoea, bleeding, uterine volume, endometrial thickness and quality of life; combination with GnRH analogues is more effective than LNG-IUS alone.
- Adjunctive medical: GnRH analogues (with add-back), oral progestins and dienogest; NSAIDs and tranexamic acid for symptom relief.
- Uterus-sparing options (fertility intent): adenomyomectomy (pooled pregnancy rate about 50 percent), HIFU, UAE — all carry recurrence and uterine-rupture risk.
- Definitive endpoint: hysterectomy is the cure for women who have completed childbearing with refractory disease.
- Principle: shared decision-making weighing symptom burden, fertility intent, age and acceptability.[5][6]
References6ShowHide
- [1]Munro MG, Critchley HO, Broder MS, et al. FIGO classification system (PALM-COEIN) for causes of abnormal uterine bleeding in nongravid women of reproductive age. Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 2011.PMID 21345435
- [2]Van den Bosch T, Dueholm M, Leone FP, et al. Terms, definitions and measurements to describe sonographic features of myometrium and uterine masses: a consensus opinion from the Morphological Uterus Sonographic Assessment (MUSA) group. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2015.PMID 25652685
- [3]Reinhold C, McCarthy S, Bret PM, et al. Diffuse adenomyosis: comparison of endovaginal US and MR imaging with histopathologic correlation. Radiology, 1996.PMID 8633139
- [4]Champaneria R, Abedin P, Daniels J, Balogun M, Khan KS Ultrasound scan and magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of adenomyosis: systematic review comparing test accuracy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, 2010.PMID 20932128
- [5]Zhang B, Shi J, Gu Z, et al. The role of different LNG-IUS therapies in the management of adenomyosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Reprod Biol Endocrinol, 2025.PMID 39948612
- [6]Liu L, Wang T, Li Y, et al. Reproductive outcomes after fertility-sparing interventions for symptomatic adenomyosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth, 2025.PMID 41206447