Gen Surg Vivas · surgical-critical-care
Postoperative sepsis — from ward fever to ICU rescue: scoring, timing wars, and the urgent-versus-crash call
Fellowship viva on postoperative sepsis escalation: qSOFA/SOFA by setting, hour-1 gradients with the shock-stratified counterweight, norepinephrine-first resuscitation, and the AbSeS urgent source-control paradox.
On this page
Study tools
Target exams
Write your answer
Saved on this device. No marking — you are the marker.
Examiner probes
- Score him overnight and this morning — qSOFA, SOFA, and why the score changes with location.[1][5]
- He now meets shock physiology. Argue the antibiotic hour for and against, with numbers, and tell me what you actually do.[39][40][41][42]
- Resuscitate him: fluids, pressor choice, pressure target and perfusion endpoints.[1][57]
- No stoma, likely leak, resuscitated by hour 3 — crash theatre now or urgent booking? Defend with the paradox.[44]
Model responses
1. Overnight qSOFA 2, morning septic shock — and the score follows the bed. Overnight: respiratory rate 24 scores 1 point while systolic 102 misses the 100 threshold and mentation is intact — so qSOFA 1, already a ward prompt for cultures, lactate and senior review, since first fever after day 2 carries sixfold odds of infectious complication.[1][15] Morning: drowsy, systolic 88, tachypnoeic — qSOFA 3 with lactate 3.4 on fluids, vasopressor-imminent: Sepsis-3 shock physiology with mortality above 40%.[1][3] Use qSOFA here because he is on the ward — in surgical cohorts it predicts mortality best on the intermediate unit (AUC 0.82) while SOFA takes over once ICU care is involved.[5]
2. For the hour: gradients in thousands; against: one honest null — and shock decides. For: mortality rises steadily after 1 hour across 17,990 patients; each hour costs odds 1.07 pooled across 106,845 patients; and the shock-stratified cohort gives within-1-hour odds 0.66 in shock versus 0.85 non-significant without it.[39][41][40] Against: a 482-patient Sepsis-3 cohort at 115-minute median found no timing association at 7, 14 or 28 days.[42] Action: antibiotics now, inside the hour, with cultures first but never delayed — he is in shock, where the benefit is proven, and the CT happens in parallel.[40][39]
3. Fluids, then norepinephrine first to 65 — then stop chasing pressure. Crystalloid bolus with reassessment, then norepinephrine to mean arterial pressure 65 mmHg or more: mortality relative risk 0.89 over dopamine with number needed to treat 9 and fewer arrhythmias.[57][1] Endpoints are perfusion — mentation, urine output, lactate kinetics in context, capillary refill — not a higher number, because persistent lactate without hypoperfusion misleads.[1]
4. Urgent at 2 to 6 hours, not crash — resuscitated urgency beats unprepared speed. Against emergency control inside 2 hours, urgent 2-to-6-hour control carried half the mortality odds (0.50) in 1,077 secondary-peritonitis patients at 29.7% mortality — while failed control multiplied death 5.71-fold.[44] So: resuscitate, contrast CT for leak versus collection, book urgently, operate without a stoma by resection or repair with washout — and if physiology collapses despite resuscitation, the indication becomes emergency regardless of the clock.[44]
References10ShowHide
- [1]Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW, Shankar-Hari M, et al. The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA, 2016.PMID 26903338
- [3]Shankar-Hari M, Phillips GS, Levy ML, Seymour CW, et al. Developing a New Definition and Assessing New Clinical Criteria for Septic Shock: For the Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA, 2016.PMID 26903336
- [5]Koch C, Edinger F, Fischer T, Brenck F, et al. Comparison of qSOFA score, SOFA score, and SIRS criteria for the prediction of infection and mortality among surgical intermediate and intensive care patients. World J Emerg Surg, 2020.PMID 33239088
- [15]Lai HF, Chau IY, Lei HJ, et al. Postoperative fever after liver resection: Incidence, risk factors, and characteristics associated with febrile infectious complication. PLoS One, 2022.PMID 35025947
- [39]Ferrer R, Martin-Loeches I, Phillips G, et al. Empiric antibiotic treatment reduces mortality in severe sepsis and septic shock from the first hour: results from a guideline-based performance improvement program. Crit Care Med, 2014.PMID 24717459
- [40]Im Y, Kang D, Ko RE, et al. Time-to-antibiotics and clinical outcomes in patients with sepsis and septic shock: a prospective nationwide multicenter cohort study. Crit Care, 2022.PMID 35027073
- [41]Huang J, Yang JT, Liu JC, et al. The association between mortality and door-to-antibiotic time: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Postgrad Med J, 2023.PMID 36917816
- [42]Seok H, Song J, Jeon JH, et al. Timing of antibiotics in septic patients: a prospective cohort study. Clin Microbiol Infect, 2020.PMID 32062049
- [44]De Pascale G, Antonelli M, Deschepper M, et al. Poor timing and failure of source control are risk factors for mortality in critically ill patients with secondary peritonitis. Intensive Care Med, 2022.PMID 36151335
- [57]Avni T, Lador A, Lev S, Leibovici L, et al. Vasopressors for the Treatment of Septic Shock: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. PLoS One, 2015.PMID 26237037