Skip to main content
MedVellum
QuestionsVideosPricing

MedVellum

Fellowship exam preparation across every specialty: source-verified topics, questions in every format, and videos.

Product

  • Specialties
  • Questions
  • Videos
  • Exam tools
  • Pricing

Verification & policy

  • Verified register
  • Editorial policy
  • Privacy
  • Terms

Account

  • Sign in
  • Create account
  • Dashboard
  • Account & billing

© 2026 MedVellum. For education only — not a substitute for clinical judgement.

llms.txtPsychiatry LLM catalogSitemap

Gen Surg Vivasvascular

Gen Surg Vivas · vascular

Infrapopliteal CLTI without usable vein — endo-first strategy, the BEST-CLI/BASIL-2 split, and rivaroxaban counselling

Fellowship viva on no-vein infrapopliteal CLTI: WIfI-PLAN-GLASS staging, BEST-CLI versus BASIL-2 strategy split, and VOYAGER rivaroxaban counselling with ISTH-bleed honesty.

clinical2 min readVerification in progress

Target exams

FRACSFRCS(Gen Surg)ABSFRCSC
On this page
Study tools

Target exams

FRACSFRCS(Gen Surg)ABSFRCSC
Prompt
A 72-year-old man has forefoot rest pain with a 5-week heel ulcer, infrapopliteal disease, and no usable great saphenous vein. His son asks why you are not offering the bypass that helped his friend, and what the new blood thinner after the procedure really buys. Talk me through your staging, your strategy choice with the trial split, and your post-procedure prescription with its bleeding honesty.

Write your answer

Saved on this device. No marking — you are the marker.

Examiner prompts and model answers

How do you stage this leg, and why three stagings? As CLTI by the syndrome definition — PAD with rest pain and a 5-week ulcer, venous, traumatic, embolic and nonatherosclerotic causes excluded — referred urgently to vascular surgery.[4] Stage the limb by WIfI because wound extent and infection join perfusion in setting amputation risk; stage the arteries by GLASS via the target artery path and limb-based patency; stage the decision by PLAN across patient risk, limb severity and anatomic complexity.[5][4] Require toe pressures as the preferred haemodynamic measure rather than pulses alone.[4]

His son cites his friend's bypass — why is your strategy different? Because the friend's leg is not this leg: BEST-CLI's surgery win (MALE-or-death 42.6 versus 57.4%, HR 0.68) belongs to cohort 1 with adequate single-segment saphenous vein, while this man without usable vein lives in cohort 2's world where surgery and endo tie (HR 0.79, nonsignificant).[8] His mandatory infrapopliteal disease maps directly onto BASIL-2: vein-first versus best-endo-first gave amputation-or-death of 63 versus 53% favouring endo-first (HR 1.35), driven by deaths at 53 versus 45% — so endo-first is the evidence-based strategy, with prosthetic bypass markedly inferior below the knee on patency and limb loss if surgery were forced.[7][20]

What does revascularisation buy him beyond the limb — and what must you watch? Quality of life improves meaningfully whichever strategy is chosen — BEST-CLI shows cohort-wide gains on every measure, with small endo-favouring gaps on VascuQoL, SF-12 MCS and pain scales and ties on EQ-5D and physical scores.[21] Then long-term limb surveillance per GVG, because the BASIL-2 deaths were mostly cardiovascular and respiratory: the limb threatens and the system kills, so best medical therapy (antithrombotic, lipid-lowering, antihypertensive, glycaemic agents plus smoking, diet, exercise and foot-care counselling) runs beside the procedure.[4][7]

What does the post-procedure rivaroxaban buy, stated honestly? Vascular-dose rivaroxaban (2.5 mg twice daily) plus aspirin after lower-limb revascularisation gives a 3-year primary composite of 17.3 versus 19.9% (HR 0.85) across 6564 VOYAGER patients — and the total-events analysis shows 4.4 primary and 12.5 vascular events avoided per 100 participants over 3 years.[9][10] The honesty: TIMI major bleeding ties (2.65 versus 1.87%, p=0.07) but ISTH major bleeding rises (5.94 versus 4.06%, p=0.007) — so select for bleeding risk, counsel explicitly, and never present it as free benefit.[9]

References8ShowHide
  1. [4]Conte MS, et al. Global vascular guidelines on the management of chronic limb-threatening ischemia. J Vasc Surg, 2019.PMID 31159978
  2. [5]Mills JL Sr, et al. The Society for Vascular Surgery Lower Extremity Threatened Limb Classification System: risk stratification based on wound, ischemia, and foot infection (WIfI). J Vasc Surg, 2014.PMID 24126108
  3. [7]Bradbury AW, et al. A vein bypass first versus a best endovascular treatment first revascularisation strategy for patients with chronic limb threatening ischaemia who required an infra-popliteal, with or without an additional more proximal infra-inguinal revascularisation procedure to restore limb perfusion (BASIL-2): an open-label, randomised, multicentre, phase 3 trial. Lancet, 2023.PMID 37116524
  4. [8]Farber A, et al. Surgery or Endovascular Therapy for Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia. N Engl J Med, 2022.PMID 36342173
  5. [20]Almasri J, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of revascularization outcomes of infrainguinal chronic limb-threatening ischemia. J Vasc Surg, 2019.PMID 31159976
  6. [9]Bonaca MP, et al. Rivaroxaban in Peripheral Artery Disease after Revascularization. N Engl J Med, 2020.PMID 32222135
  7. [10]Bauersachs RM, et al. Total Ischemic Event Reduction With Rivaroxaban After Peripheral Arterial Revascularization in the VOYAGER PAD Trial. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2021.PMID 34010631
  8. [21]Menard MT, et al. Quality of Life in Patients With Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia Treated With Revascularization. Circulation, 2024.PMID 38597097
Previous72-year-old starting dialysis on a catheter — attempt, configuration, surveillance and cannulation counsellingvascularNextIntermediate-risk PE with RV strain and a bleeding history — systemic lysis versus catheter versus anticoagulation, consent, and the long-term picturevascular