Skip to main content
MedVellum
QuestionsVideosPricing

MedVellum

Fellowship exam preparation across every specialty: source-verified topics, questions in every format, and videos.

Product

  • Specialties
  • Questions
  • Videos
  • Exam tools
  • Pricing

Verification & policy

  • Verified register
  • Editorial policy
  • Privacy
  • Terms

Account

  • Sign in
  • Create account
  • Dashboard
  • Account & billing

© 2026 MedVellum. For education only — not a substitute for clinical judgement.

llms.txtPsychiatry LLM catalogSitemap

Gen Surg Vivastrauma

Gen Surg Vivas · trauma

Hoarse garage-fire burn with adequate urine output, elderly scald, and chemical splash — inhalation grades, depth lethality, and irrigation choice

Fellowship viva on burns assessment and resuscitation: inhalation grading with mortality, endpoint integration, elderly depth lethality, chemical irrigation.

clinical1 min readVerification in progress

Target exams

FRACSFRCS(Gen Surg)ABSFRCSC
On this page
Study tools

Target exams

FRACSFRCS(Gen Surg)ABSFRCSC
Prompt
A 34-year-old garage-fire burn is hoarse with soot-stained nares; his urine output reads 35 ml/hr on high crystalloids. Next door an 82-year-old woman has a 13% scald that looks deep, and a third patient arrives with a cement splash to the leg. Talk me through the inhalation workup with grades and numbers, why the urine output does not reassure, what the elderly scald carries, and how you decontaminate the chemical burn.

Write your answer

Saved on this device. No marking — you are the marker.

Examiner prompts

  • He is hoarse with soot. What does history alone predict, and what is your airway workup with the tube-size and lavage numbers?[13][11]
  • His bronchoscopy returns severe. What does that carry — the two odds ratios, the ARDS climb, the three-level deaths and vent hours?[13][15][16]
  • Urine output is 35 ml/hr. Why does that not reassure — the five-endpoint bundle, the superior marker, and the 53-patient failure?[9][10]
  • The 82-year-old has 13% that looks deep. What does the deep-share number do to her prognosis?[32]
  • The cement splash keeps burning. Irrigate, pack, or debride first — with what numbers?[27]

Model answers

  • History alone does not predict mortality — scope within 24h; the panel rates ≥ 8.0 mm tubes, lung-protective ventilation, initial and serial lavage for severe injury, heparin/salbutamol for moderate-severe and N-acetylcysteine for moderate injury as appropriate, with prophylactic antibiotics and steroids inappropriate.[13][11]
  • Severe bronchoscopy carries adjusted OR 45.357 with ventilation OR 9.787; carboxyhemoglobin rises with AIS grade while ARDS climbs 0/22/57/80% at 24h with grades 2–3 predicting ARDS and >21 vent days; three-level deaths run 2.3/7.4/30.7% with ventilation 26/84/94 h and severe-only independent mortality at OR 20.4.[13][15][16]
  • Because MAP, HR, UO and lactate are established together with lactate superior and no single endpoint sufficient — and in 53 patients ≥15% TBSA the 30 to 50 ml/hr plus MAP above 70 yardsticks held while lactate and base deficit stayed abnormally high.[9][10]
  • Her 13% mirrors the elderly pattern exactly: smaller TBSA (13% vs 22.5%) with deep share 41% vs 23.3% and mortality 48% vs 24% (OR 2.9, adjusted 12.02) — resuscitate and refer as a high-mortality burn despite the small number.[32]
  • Irrigate continuously first: immediate debridement failed to beat irrigation or wet packs, irrigation beat wet packs, and continuous water irrigation remains preferred — debride later, not first.[27]
  • Doctrine close: re-measure size, integrate five endpoints with least fluid, scope the airway, and send hand/face/neck/leg burns to the burn centre.[9][13]
References8ShowHide
  1. [9]Belaunzaran M, Raslan S, Ali A, et al. Utilization and Efficacy of Resuscitation Endpoints in Trauma and Burn Patients: A Review Article. Am Surg, 2022.PMID 34761698
  2. [10]Jeng JC, Lee K, Jablonski K, et al. Serum lactate and base deficit suggest inadequate resuscitation of patients with burn injuries: application of a point-of-care laboratory instrument. J Burn Care Rehabil, 1997.PMID 9313119
  3. [11]Milton-Jones H, Soussi S, Davies R, et al. An international RAND/UCLA expert panel to determine the optimal diagnosis and management of burn inhalation injury. Crit Care, 2023.PMID 38012797
  4. [13]You K, Yang HT, Kym D, et al. Inhalation injury in burn patients: establishing the link between diagnosis and prognosis. Burns, 2014.PMID 25406889
  5. [15]Mosier MJ, Pham TN, Park DR, et al. Predictive value of bronchoscopy in assessing the severity of inhalation injury. J Burn Care Res, 2012.PMID 21941194
  6. [16]Aung MT, Garner D, Pacquola M, et al. The use of a simple three-level bronchoscopic assessment of inhalation injury to predict in-hospital mortality and duration of mechanical ventilation in patients with burns. Anaesth Intensive Care, 2018.PMID 29361258
  7. [27]Tan T, Wong DS. Chemical burns revisited: What is the most appropriate method of decontamination? Burns, 2015.PMID 25459216
  8. [32]Albornoz CR, Villegas J, Sylvester M, et al. Burns are more aggressive in the elderly: proportion of deep burn area/total burn area might have a role in mortality. Burns, 2011.PMID 21571438
PreviousExsanguinating polytrauma listed for damage control — abbreviation, ratios, clock, packs, closuretraumaNextLeft-sided tension, blood in the chest, bruise on the heart — decompress, drain, screen, sequencetrauma