Gen Surg Vivas · breast
Dense breasts with a normal mammogram — supplemental MRI, ultrasound, notification and the USPSTF honesty clause
Fellowship viva on dense-breast supplemental screening: DENSE interval halving with false-positive price, abbreviated MRI versus DBT head-to-head, adjunct ultrasound yield, notification systems effects, USPSTF I statement, BI-RADS ladder, and BRCA surveillance contrast.
On this page
Study tools
Target exams
Write your answer
Saved on this device. No marking — you are the marker.
Examiner prompts with model answers
Density first — risk and mask. Dense tissue is an independent risk factor and it lowers mammographic sensitivity — the two-word reason her normal mammogram reassures less than average.[24]
DENSE — the numbers you must carry. In 40,373 Dutch women with extremely dense breasts, MRI invitation cut interval cancers from 5.0 to 2.5 per 1000; 59% accepted, detection ran 16.5 per 1000 in scanned women, false positives 79.8 per 1000, predictive value 17.4% for recall and 26.3% for biopsy. Offer with both halves quoted.[21]
Abbreviated MRI versus DBT — the head-to-head. EA1141 in dense breasts: invasive detection 11.8 versus 4.8 per 1000, sensitivity 95.7 versus 39.1%, specificity 86.7 versus 97.4%. MRI is the most sensitive test she can buy and the least specific — consent the recalls, not just the cancers.[22]
Ultrasound's fenced role. Adjunct ultrasound improves detection of small node-negative invasive cancers, from Connecticut 2009 to the 2019 federal mandate — operator-dependent, biopsy-generating, and a complement rather than a competitor to MRI.[23]
What notification changed. US density laws lifted supplemental screening use by 0.5 to 143%, biopsy rates by up to 4% and detection by up to 11% — a systems effect: expect busier assessment clinics wherever notification lands.[24]
The USPSTF honesty clause. Despite DENSE, the Task Force calls supplemental ultrasound or MRI evidence insufficient after a negative mammogram in dense breasts — interval cancers are not mortality, and saying so is the distinction-marker answer.[2]
Reading her next report. Walk the BI-RADS ladder: 0 recalls, 1 to 2 routine, 3 surveillance, 4 (4A 7.6, 4B 22, 4C 69.3%) biopsies, 5 plans surgery, 6 stages known cancer — and benign core against 4C or 5 imaging means re-biopsy, never reassurance.[27]
Were she a BRCA carrier — different pathway entirely. Pre-surgery surveillance is overwhelmingly MRI from age 18 to 30 with 6-to-12-monthly examination across 22 centres in 16 countries — earlier, more intensive, and guideline-owned, not extrapolated from DENSE.[45]
References7ShowHide
- [21]Bakker MF, et al. Supplemental MRI Screening for Women with Extremely Dense Breast Tissue. N Engl J Med, 2019.PMID 31774954
- [22]Comstock CE, et al. Comparison of Abbreviated Breast MRI vs Digital Breast Tomosynthesis for Breast Cancer Detection Among Women With Dense Breasts Undergoing Screening. JAMA, 2020.PMID 32096852
- [24]Huang S, et al. The impact of mandatory mammographic breast density notification on supplemental screening practice in the United States: a systematic review. Breast Cancer Res Treat, 2021.PMID 33774734
- [2]Nicholson WK, et al. Screening for Breast Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement. JAMA, 2024.PMID 38687503
- [27]Elezaby M, et al. ACR BI-RADS Assessment Category 4 Subdivisions in Diagnostic Mammography: Utilization and Outcomes in the National Mammography Database. Radiology, 2018.PMID 29315061
- [45]Madorsky-Feldman D, et al. An international survey of surveillance schemes for unaffected BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. Breast Cancer Res Treat, 2016.PMID 27117159
- [23]Butler RS, et al. Screening Breast Ultrasound: Update After 10 Years of Breast Density Notification Laws. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2020.PMID 32182096