Skip to main content
MedVellum
QuestionsVideosPricing

MedVellum

Fellowship exam preparation across every specialty: source-verified topics, questions in every format, and videos.

Product

  • Specialties
  • Questions
  • Videos
  • Exam tools
  • Pricing

Verification & policy

  • Verified register
  • Editorial policy
  • Privacy
  • Terms

Account

  • Sign in
  • Create account
  • Dashboard
  • Account & billing

© 2026 MedVellum. For education only — not a substitute for clinical judgement.

llms.txtPsychiatry LLM catalogSitemap

Gen Surg Vivasbreast

Gen Surg Vivas · breast

Axillary de-escalation — B-32 staging, micrometastatic omission, radiotherapy swap and clipped-node triage

Fellowship viva on axillary de-escalation: B-32 sentinel standard with morbidity, Z0011/IBCSG omission with survival control, AMAROS radiotherapy preference, SOUND observation boundary, and SENTINA/Z1071/TAD post-neoadjuvant accuracy.

clinical1 min readVerification in progress

Target exams

FRACSFRCS(Gen Surg)ABSFRCSC
On this page
Study tools

Target exams

FRACSFRCS(Gen Surg)ABSFRCSC
Prompt
A 55-year-old woman has a 1.8 cm cancer with one positive sentinel node planned for lumpectomy and irradiation, and a 48-year-old woman has biopsy-proven cN1 disease with nodal response after chemotherapy. Talk me through upfront omission fences, the radiotherapy swap, SOUND observation, and post-chemotherapy clipped-node staging.

Write your answer

Saved on this device. No marking — you are the marker.

Examiner prompts with model answers

Sentinel standard — stage, do not clear, the node-negative axilla. Sentinel nodes are removed in 97.2% with 97.1% accuracy and 9.8% false-negative rate, dual radio-blue in 65.1% with 0.7% blue allergy, and more than one node without excisional biopsy lowers the miss rate — with shoulder, volume and sensory morbidity all favouring sentinel surgery over dissection at 3 years.[2]

Upfront omission — Z0011 and micrometastases. T1-T2 nonpalpable disease with 1-2 positive sentinels treated by lumpectomy, tangential irradiation and systemic therapy needs no dissection with 10-year survival 86.3% versus 83.6% — while micrometastatic 2 mm-or-smaller disease without extracapsular extension needs no dissection with 10-year disease-free survival 76.8% versus 74.9% and 4% versus 13% lymphoedema.[5][8]

Radiotherapy swap — control equal, morbidity decides. Sentinel-positive cT1-2 disease gives 10-year axillary recurrence 0.93% versus 1.82% with no survival difference, while lymphoedema runs 24.5% versus 11.9% — radiotherapy preferred for less arm morbidity.[10]

Observation boundary — SOUND small cancers. Tumours up to 2 cm with negative ultrasound randomise to sentinel surgery or nothing with 13.7% occult positivity yet 97.7% versus 98.0% distant control — spare surgery only when missing pathology leaves adjuvant decisions unchanged.[11]

Post-chemotherapy staging — clips rescue the miss rate. Sentinel biopsy before chemotherapy detects 99.1% but after cN+ to ycN0 conversion detects 80.1% with 14.2% false-negative rising to 24.3% with one node; baseline post-chemotherapy false-negative rate 12.6% falls to 6.8% when the clipped node is retrieved in the sentinel packet versus 19.0% when stranded — with targeted dissection cutting sentinel-alone 10.1% to 1.4% combined and 2.0% for TAD with dissection.[13][12][14]

References8ShowHide
  1. [2]Krag DN, et al. Technical outcomes of sentinel-lymph-node resection and conventional axillary-lymph-node dissection in patients with clinically node-negative breast cancer: results from the NSABP B-32 randomised phase III trial. Lancet Oncol, 2007.PMID 17851130
  2. [5]Giuliano AE, et al. Effect of Axillary Dissection vs No Axillary Dissection on 10-Year Overall Survival Among Women With Invasive Breast Cancer and Sentinel Node Metastasis: The ACOSOG Z0011 (Alliance) Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA, 2017.PMID 28898379
  3. [8]Galimberti V, et al. Axillary dissection versus no axillary dissection in patients with breast cancer and sentinel-node micrometastases (IBCSG 23-01): 10-year follow-up of a randomised, controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol, 2018.PMID 30196031
  4. [10]Bartels SAL, et al. Radiotherapy or Surgery of the Axilla After a Positive Sentinel Node in Breast Cancer: 10-Year Results of the Randomized Controlled EORTC 10981-22023 AMAROS Trial. J Clin Oncol, 2023.PMID 36383926
  5. [11]Gentilini OD, et al. Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy vs No Axillary Surgery in Patients With Small Breast Cancer and Negative Results on Ultrasonography of Axillary Lymph Nodes: The SOUND Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Oncol, 2023.PMID 37733364
  6. [12]Boughey JC, et al. Identification and Resection of Clipped Node Decreases the False-negative Rate of Sentinel Lymph Node Surgery in Patients Presenting With Node-positive Breast Cancer (T0-T4, N1-N2) Who Receive Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: Results From ACOSOG Z1071 (Alliance). Ann Surg, 2016.PMID 26649589
  7. [13]Kuehn T, et al. Sentinel-lymph-node biopsy in patients with breast cancer before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (SENTINA): a prospective, multicentre cohort study. Lancet Oncol, 2013.PMID 23683750
  8. [14]Caudle AS, et al. Improved Axillary Evaluation Following Neoadjuvant Therapy for Patients With Node-Positive Breast Cancer Using Selective Evaluation of Clipped Nodes: Implementation of Targeted Axillary Dissection. J Clin Oncol, 2016.PMID 26811528
PreviousWarfarin fall with thin subdural, young extradural, and refractory pressure — reversal, millimetres, and rescuetraumaNextBreast reconstruction choice — options, timing under radiotherapy, implant versus DIEP trade-offs, nipple safety and BREAST-Qbreast