Gen Surg SAQs · surgical-critical-care
Bleeding laparotomy with consumption — SIC screen, JAAM-2 start, transfuse and time TXA
Fellowship SAQ on surgical DIC: ISTH/SIC history with JAAM-2 treatment-start logic, BCSH bleeding-only products with consensus thresholds, JSTH antithrombin/thrombomodulin evidence and TXA timing.
On this page
Study tools
Target exams
Write your answer
Saved on this device. No marking — you are the marker.
Model answer
(A) DIC with SIC-positive compensated disease — screen by SIC, start by JAAM-2 (3 marks). DIC is widespread microvascular thrombosis with consumptive coagulopathy causing thrombosis and hemorrhage.[28] ISTH overt criteria from 2001 remain the global decompensated standard, with SIC introduced in 2019 to catch the compensated phase that leads to overt disease.[3] His pattern (falling platelets and fibrinogen, raised D-dimer, long PT-INR with sepsis and organ dysfunction) is clinical-plus-laboratory DIC requiring repeated testing through the dynamic scenario.[1] Screen and monitor by SIC (platelets, PT-INR and SOFA only), and let JAAM-2 (platelets, PT-INR and fibrinogen/FDP) guide treatment start — the only score showing effect modification for both benefit and harm.[4][14][13]
(B) Bleeding-only products; no heparin while bleeding (4 marks). Products are reserved for bleeding, not numbers — with only three small RCTs under 100 patients showing no survival signal for FFP or platelets.[1][2] He bleeds with consumption, so: consider platelets for bleeding or high-risk low platelets with no prophylactic transfusion when dry without high risk; give FFP for bleeding with prolonged PT/aPTT, never on labs alone, with no evidence that plasma fuels coagulation; and treat persistent severe hypofibrinogenaemia despite FFP with fibrinogen concentrate or cryoprecipitate.[1] By numbers: maintain platelets above 50 while bleeding with 20 to 30 acceptable when dry.[2] Heparin has no place while he bleeds: therapeutic heparin is for thrombotic phenotypes (thromboembolism, purpura fulminans with ischemia or infarction) with continuous UFH when bleeding threatens, and prophylactic heparin or LMWH only while critically ill and non-bleeding, with consensus LMWH until bleeding or platelets below 30.[1][2]
(C) AT/rTM resolve DIC without proven survival gain; TXA only for early hyperfibrinolysis (3 marks). JSTH sepsis guidance recommends antithrombin and recombinant thrombomodulin (each GRADE 1B) with no clear heparin recommendation and combination therapy left as future research.[7] The evidence split to state: antithrombin RCTs show no mortality difference with higher bleeding in both designs; AT and rhTM each raise DIC resolution rates without mortality or bleeding differences — so quote resolution separately from survival.[9][11] Future trials must enrol severe, clearly DIC-defined patients without heparin masking, per the SCARLET critique.[26] For TXA: blunt-trauma data study TXA within 3 hours with mortality odds tracking PT-INR, DIC score, APTT and falling fibrinogen — give early TXA for confirmed hyperfibrinolytic bleeding in this window, never for later shutdown-phase prothrombotic physiology.[12]
References12ShowHide
- [1]Levi M, Toh CH, Thachil J, et al. Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of disseminated intravascular coagulation. British Committee for Standards in Haematology. Br J Haematol, 2009.PMID 19222477
- [2]Squizzato A, Hunt BJ, Kinasewitz GT, et al. Supportive management strategies for disseminated intravascular coagulation. An international consensus. Thromb Haemost, 2016.PMID 26676927
- [3]Iba T, Levi M, Thachil J, et al. Communication from the Scientific and Standardization Committee of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis on sepsis-induced coagulopathy in the management of sepsis. J Thromb Haemost, 2023.PMID 36695377
- [4]Iba T, Helms J, Connors JM, et al. The pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management of sepsis-associated disseminated intravascular coagulation. J Intensive Care, 2023.PMID 37221630
- [7]Yamakawa K, Okamoto K, Seki Y, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for management of disseminated intravascular coagulation in Japan 2024. Part 1: sepsis. Int J Hematol, 2025.PMID 39676120
- [9]Tsuchida T, Makino Y, Wada T, et al. Efficacy of antithrombin administration for patients with sepsis: A systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression. Acute Med Surg, 2024.PMID 38638892
- [11]Li W, Sheng S, Zhu F Efficacy and safety of antithrombin or recombinant human thrombomodulin in the treatment of disseminated intravascular coagulation: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Thromb Res, 2025.PMID 40068332
- [12]Takahashi Y, Hayakawa M, Itagaki Y, et al. Coagulopathy as a predictor of the effectiveness of tranexamic acid in severe blunt trauma: a multicenter retrospective study. Thromb J, 2025.PMID 40264127
- [13]Matsuoka T, Yamakawa K, Umemura Y, et al. The modified Japanese Association for Acute Medicine disseminated intravascular coagulation diagnostic criteria in sepsis is useful for an indicator of initiating treatment for disseminated intravascular coagulation. Thromb Res, 2025.PMID 40738094
- [14]Takahashi M, Wada T, Tsuchida T, et al. Validation of the Japanese Association for Acute Medicine-2 disseminated intravascular coagulation criteria to predict critical bleeding in patients with trauma: A nationwide cohort study in Japan. Thromb Res, 2025.PMID 41232203
- [26]Guo JY, Lin HY Why anticoagulant studies on sepsis fail frequently --- start with SCARLET. Chin J Traumatol, 2023.PMID 37321903
- [28]Nguyen BL, Pham MQ, Nguyen TH, et al. Acute Intraoperative Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation During Suppurative Keloid Excision: A Case Report. Am J Case Rep, 2026.PMID 42237503